Cindy Lee
Diamond Jubilee


2.0
poor

Review

by Ambrosian USER (5 Reviews)
December 19th, 2024 | 42 replies


Release Date: 03/29/2024 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Chill lofi rock music to study/relax to.

At first glance, this is a very intriguing album which boasts a 2+ hour runtime, evocative cover art, and a promise of reinterpreting the sounds of rock’s golden age for the 21st century. However, what is primarily found here is an example of a lack of creative force and the enervating influence of playlists and streaming services on music.

While the 1960s are one of the chief influences on the sound of this record, Cindy Lee is not attempting to simply repackage 60s music, but rather to use the 60s as a means to capture a sense of nostalgia and longing. Cindy Lee’s hazy dream is not inspired by the wild and experimental 1960s of the Rolling Stones, The Who, or Pink Floyd, but instead, the songs of Diamond Jubilee are inspired by the kitschy and highly commercial 60s pop that now lays dusty and dormant on vinyl records at thrift stores, or forgotten in grandparent’s basements. The musical idea of Diamond Jubilee is to filter these forgotten (and imagined) sounds of the past though the lens of lofi indie pop to create a dreamy and nostalgic soundscape.

The album presents us with 32 songs that primarily dwell on the genres of surf-rock, dream pop, psychedelia, and jangle pop. The instruments are recorded in a way to present a retro and analogue sound, as if to give the impression that this album is “found footage” from another era. The tremolo heavy instrumentals are topped by what is one of the album’s weaker aspects: Patrick Flegel’s voice. His androgynous vocal style is flat and without attitude or emotion, the generous amount of reverb applied to it seems to be an attempt to make it more musical, or at least to turn it into an instrument, and this adds to the monotony of the whole project. I can imagine the groovy tracks Flesh and Blood, Stone Faces, or Dracula being elevated by a more forceful and personal delivery, but Flegel just weakly drones over the tracks regardless of their feel. It is not a surprise then that some of the album’s highlights are the more melancholic songs: the songs Dreams of You, Always Dreaming, and Til Polarity’s End are lovely pieces which make the best use of the album’s hazy sound. Diamond Jubilee’s best song is the moody If You Hear Me Crying which features an exciting melody and a welcome blast of guitar distortion that interrupts the drowsy somnolence of the rest of the album.

Although there are nice songs on here, they only exist to cultivate a “vibe” or aesthetic, and this is the most significant aspect of this album, and is what makes it most distinctly a product of our time. While Cindy Lee has an aversion to streaming services, they have made an album that is directly a product of the streaming industry, for this collection of songs more resembles a mood based playlist than a traditional album. It is music designed to be background noise that evokes a certain feeling. It’s as if AI generated these songs to create an ambiance at a costume party. Other than the occasional pretty melody, there isn’t anything to these songs other than their aesthetic and sentimental associations.

This lack of musical ideas would have been more tolerable if the record was under an hour, but at just over two hours, the mediocrity becomes almost unbearable without some kind of distraction. This long runtime encourages the use of this album as disposable background music, as there just isn’t enough substance here to keep one engaged for the runtime. Further, there isn’t a progression to this record, the album is completely formless, the track-list could be randomized and the listening experience would remain the same. This is the Spotify playlist experience of music.

The tedium of the music reveals that the nostalgic sound is just a cover for creative exhaustion. Releases like these betray a lack of ideas and forward impetus, which has resulted in a wider cultural tendency to create comforting images of the past to evoke sentimental feelings. When artists have lost their creative vitality, their recourse is to make copies of the forms that worked before, but it is inevitable that these copies lack the power of the originals.

There is an irony at the heart of Diamond Jubilee: the fact that the powerfully vibrant music of the past has almost no resemblance to this album’s dull and tedious songs.


user ratings (101)
3.9
excellent


Comments:Add a Comment 
artificialbox
Emeritus
December 19th 2024


3794 Comments


Oh wow, I wasnt expecting the first review for this to be negative. Well written though! I haven’t even listened to this yet and Im not sure I want to.

Tundra
December 19th 2024


10740 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Yeah I've seen this album make the rounds online spaces this year. It's probably the most overhyped album on the Internet this year, and by that, I mean it's the most pretentious, "artsy," and abstract release of the year that sounds awful, the mixing is an absolute clusterfuck of sound that is pure fucking chaos. Tones are absolutely abysmal, but somehow has some "artistic" value because of course it does. That's why I can't really trust albums that get all this online hype; I just knew it was going to be a total disaster. At least these hyped albums have a reputation, even if it's not a great one.

Pikazilla
December 19th 2024


32373 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

I agree with Tundra



This belongs in that same proverbial bin for vapid shite like vampire weekend



Kill it with fire



Sitting through 2hrs of this obnoxious ostentatiously bedroom-chic crapfest is an achievement in and of itself

cylinder
December 19th 2024


4362 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Some great points in this review



pos

mkmusic1995
Contributing Reviewer
December 19th 2024


2552 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Well written review even if I disagree almost entirely. Good shit, my friend.

PumpBoffBag
Emeritus
December 19th 2024


1840 Comments

Album Rating: 4.1

Yeah really great review, props. Will check this soon

robertsona
Emeritus
December 19th 2024


28660 Comments


I too like this review

DoofDoof
December 20th 2024


17300 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

This is the most overrated album of the year…but it’s still v good

dedex
Emeritus
December 20th 2024


13008 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

[2] doof

ashcrash9
Emeritus
December 20th 2024


3492 Comments


I got about 40 minutes into this the other day and generally respect that it does what it does okay enough, but I did not find the music or the concept particularly interesting and didn't feel like forcing the remaining runtime. generally agree with the points this review makes though I don't think it's quite as damning as this makes it sound. it really is one of those records that kinda rides or dies on how much you vibe with its specific retro-vision

BMDrummer
December 20th 2024


15279 Comments


interesting to step out of the bubble this album has certainly inflated

i still mostly see it as the project the Women singer did after that band, not in a bad way though. album is good but i completely get the criticisms leveled here, actually a little nice to hear some pushback after mostly seeing crazy relentless praise lol

Squiggly
December 21st 2024


1532 Comments


Good points made here. I love how this feels like a warped, out-of-time radio station. But i may have given it the benefit of the doubt too much in fact. Will have to revisit.

Also, somebody said it was put on spotify, which was true, but now it’s bo longer listed on Cindy Lee’s page, and in my library it remains but only has 26 songs?? Was it put there without their permission?

calmrose
December 21st 2024


7141 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Appears so, apparently Spotify "wasn't an official upload and was taken down and Bandcamp and Youtube remain the two official streams" per BrooklynVegan

plane
Emeritus
December 21st 2024


168 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Well-written and dumb!

secondsun
December 21st 2024


55 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

this made me finally listen to this since it's the first review i've seen that isn't wildly ecstatic over it and you pretty much nailed it



like i enjoyed it but this is literally the exact same thing Bradford Cox did a decade ago with Atlas Sound except he had the self-control to not make those albums two hours long lol

zakalwe
December 22nd 2024


41955 Comments


The opener is absolutely fucking amazing but I’ll be buggered if I’m going to sit through 2hrs of ‘consuming’ the thing on YouTube I’d rather stick a skirt on and place me head in the oven.

DoofDoof
December 22nd 2024


17300 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Diamond YouTubeilee

zakalwe
December 22nd 2024


41955 Comments


Ma’am

Sowing
Moderator
December 22nd 2024


45535 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

No qualms with the well-composed negative review, but I almost entirely disagree. I think Flegel's voice is a perfect fit for the music; a more powerful or intentional vocal assertion would be at odds with the spellbinding 60's-inspired atmosphere. I also think that your critical diagnosis of the album's formlessness is actually pinpointing one of its greatest strengths. If this was too structured and deliberate, it would miss the point of being a dreamy, almost aqueous experience. There isn't necessarily supposed to be a point or something to be gleaned from this -- it's sort of just a "the journey is the purpose" kind of experience and I enjoyed the hell out of the trip. The one area of the review I agree with is that this didn't have to be two hours long. Because of the vibe and how easily this draws you into even its least arresting moments, I don't necessarily mind -- but you could likely pare it down to an 80-90 minute "double album" and still have an experience similar to what this triple one offers. But again, it's not really a quantitative matter to me. This dreams up something that is absolutely magical, and its beauty is what will keep me on its hook for years to come, even if I'm not settling in for all two hours of it daily.

farmerobama
December 22nd 2024


655 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Very well written and I can see the point with the spotify playlist and exchangeable running order. But otherwise I disagree, especially with the last paragraph. I do not think this is copying stuff that worked before or shows a lack of ideas and forward impetus, quite the opposite. I also disagree with the narrative of it being a 'nostalgic' album and let me explain why. Basically noone who listens to this was alive when the sounds it recreates and reimagines were popular. So why do people have a nostalgia-adjacent feeling when they hear these sounds? I would follow Mark Fishers argument here that -in very short terms- it's the ghosts of the past that haunt our present because the future of our generation has been cancelled. This concept of hauntological music is very much present in this album and it creates such an eerie vibe that many young people (like me) can relate to on an deep emotional level.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy