Radiohead
In Rainbows


4.0
excellent

Review

by David James Young USER (181 Reviews)
October 13th, 2007 | 27 replies | 4,395 views


Release Date: 2007 | Tracklist

Review Summary: An unpredictable record from the biggest unsigned band in the world.

1 of 1 thought this review was well written

It should not take a band four years to write ten songs. This is one of the main frustrating things that is found on the outlet of listening to the brand new Radiohead album, “In Rainbows”. I mean, if the band were really as genuinely brilliant and talented as the majority of music critics and fans make them out to be, then surely they would have no problem churning out more than ten songs, especially given the time between now and 2003’s Hail To The Thief. Setting this aside, however, once you’ve actually listened to the record, it’s not too much of a problem. The band has not reinvented the wheel, as they have felt the need to do in the past, the quintet have instead decided to work with what they have and just make a good album. There’s no record labels for the band to worry about anymore, there’s no pressure to write classics like “Karma Police”. As free agents, Radiohead have been free to make the music that they want- and how they want it to be made. As a result, In Rainbows is a great album, but certainly not their greatest.
And the best part? They don’t care.

Vocalist Thom Yorke whining over the top of a 5/4 drum machine beat as an introduction to the record could well lead you to believe that this album could well turn out to be similar to Yorke’s solo outing of last year, The Eraser. But by the time the rest of the band kicks in, opener “15 Step” is a gloriously experimental jazz-fusion number featuring everything from vocal percussion to a church organ. And once you think you have that figured out, the fuzzed-out bass of “Bodysnatchers” takes the band to a different dimension again. The instrumentation found here is arguably some of the most organic on the record, and the track feels like it could have easily been at home on Hail- and this is definitely not a criticism.
From here, the band can’t seem to stay in the same field for more than one track, which has its good and bad points. From one perspective, it is great to see the band trying so many different things; conversely, there are areas of music that the band explores and then abandons that should definitely have been used more.
Another thing notable about the album is that it is very laid back in its manner. Gone is the distortion and political anger of songs like “2+2=5”. As a matter of fact, on some tracks- gone are the guitars altogether, like on the soaring “All I Need”; with main musical composer Johnny Greenwood manning the pianos, synthesizers, and even the glockenspiel. It’s an ambitious move that has paid off in the past, and here is no exception.

The way that the album moves from concept to concept on its ten tracks gives the vibe that this is more a collection of the band’s ideas than a straightforward album. This is fine enough- it’s always good for something different, especially when Radiohead have mastered the art- but at times the record lacks the consistency that it needs to keep your attention for its entirety. This is present in songs like “Nude”- despite its lush vocals and lovely string arrangements, one cannot help their attention waning throughout the song.
In addition, there are no overly long songs here, the longest being a bit over five minutes. While this works well to a degree, some of the songs seem to start well and then abruptly finish- basically, there could have been a great song instead of a simply good one. This was a factor on the last Tegan and Sara album, and it is at hand in tracks like the acoustic “Faust Arp” and the track that follows it, “Reckoner”. It is unusual for a band at Radiohead’s calibre to not make the songs they put on their albums not reach their full potential- but as aforementioned in the first paragraph, this is the album they wanted to make.

In terms of the vocals, Yorke gives us no surprises (pardon the pun)- it’s the same old high-pitched, slightly incoherent warbling of previous records. Even with a few effects layered over the top of them, it’s still the same old guy. This won’t be a problem if you’re a fan of his voice, but this album certainly isn’t for you if you’re not.
As for the rest of the band, Greenwood leads the band with either flowing, almost roots-y guitar work or vast sounding keyboards. The bass is fairly rudimentary but has its moments, the beats are original and generally appealing (albeit occasionally too repetitive). At the end of the day, Johnny Greenwood is still the real star of Radiohead, no question.

To put it in Layman’s terms- fans will most probably have nothing to complain about here and non-fans will either have nothing to convert them or still have something not to like about the band. Radiohead have nothing to prove, so a step sideways as opposed to a step forward is of no problems to them. This is a really good album, an adventurous statement in modern music…but it is not without its flaws.
If you are a fan, the only reason you will be displeased with this album is if you yourself have put the hype on the band and stuck them on a giant pedestal. Tip of the day- ignore the hype and enjoy what you can from In Rainbows.



Recent reviews by this author
The Presets PacificaLast Dinosaurs In A Million Years
Every Time I Die Ex LivesDarren Hayes Secret Codes and Battleships
Wanda Jackson The Party Ain't OverPhrase Babylon
user ratings (4394)
Chart.
4.2
excellent
other reviews of this album
1 of
  • cagedbutterfly (3.5)
    Radiohead rises from the ashes of their past 3 albums and compose a beauty of a record....

    Ryder631 (5)
    After crafting songs of exquisitely Orwellian paranoia for over a decade, Radiohead give u...

    shauryapatel (4.5)
    What were the fans left with after the 'pay what you want' hype was cleared? The collectio...

    Justin Swope (5)
    In Rainbows is another breathtaking passage into the mind of Radiohead, presenting an exqu...

  • someguest (4.5)
    When I'm at the pearly gates......

    pye3214 (5)
    A modern classic and a must listen for everyone, not just Radiohead fans....

    Kuo (5)
    In conclusion this album is a classic, it is easily accessible to most listeners fan or no...

    Kiet Truong (4.5)
    An album that will most likely go down in history as Radiohead’s album that revolutioniz...

  • Alex Getter (4.5)
    Radiohead at their most intimate in years; In Rainbows is their own collection of "seducti...

    Tom Gellatly (4.5)
    An understated, consistently enjoyable album, In Rainbows feels like a wonderful comeback ...

    Nathan (4.5)
    Radiohead's unusual marketing ploy on In Rainbows may be what is most remembered looking b...

    Leslie W (4)
    Mesmerizing.......

  • Reckoner (5)
    A modern classic from the best band in the world....

    RJayZ (4.5)
    It's not easy writing a masterpiece. It's a lot less easy following one up....

    Brandon Garland (3.5)
    Although not as impressive as an Opeth album, Radiohead damn well tries to impress the Spu...

    Adam Downer STAFF (3)
    What happened to Radiohead?...

  • Chris Baranowski (4.5)
    In Rainbows is beautiful in its simplicity and once again proves that Radiohead are the ki...

    Daniel Incognito EMERITUS (4)
    Another continuation in the overall Radiohead style, and one which executes its design wit...

    Tyler Fisher EMERITUS (4)
    With the addition of a second disc, In Rainbows loses some flow but maintains the original...

    UncalledFor (4)
    May initially feel like a Let Down with No Surprises to be found (because it has Everythin...

  • Porter W. Richards (4.5)
    Dark. Disturbing. Lush, yet subdued. In Rainbows is everything fans hoped for....


Comments:Add a Comment 
tribestros
October 13th 2007



918 Comments


Good review, I pos'd, but how many reviews are we going to get for In Rainbows with a 4?

Geedrummer
October 13th 2007



607 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

good review. im starting to really enjoy this album now.

tribestros
October 13th 2007



918 Comments


People keep complaining that they ruined Videotape, but that song really is excellent.

P13
October 13th 2007



1327 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

lol, in Jigsaw Falling into Place, does anyone else hear a theramin in it? sounds like the old 50s ghost noise. OooooOOOooOOooo (if you know what i mean...)

MrKite
October 13th 2007



5020 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Theremin?

Really good album. Much easier to get into than the others I've heard by them.This Message Edited On 10.13.07

Electric City
Staff Reviewer
October 13th 2007



15732 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8 | Sound Off

Good review, I pos'd, but how many reviews are we going to get for In Rainbows with a 4?


Yeah, you should have been different and given it a 4.5. Much more hardcore.

They didn't "ruin" Videotape per se, more like didn't execute it's live potency on the album, but overall this album is good. Borrows heavily from trip hop, I noticed.
This Message Edited On 10.13.07

Two-Headed Boy
October 13th 2007



4527 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Yes, alot like their previous albums have. :p

Electric City
Staff Reviewer
October 13th 2007



15732 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8 | Sound Off

Ha, true, but this one in particular. Nude and the main part of All I Need reminds me so much of Mezzanine, but with better vocals.

Two-Headed Boy
October 13th 2007



4527 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

It's also definitely more danceable than their previous stuff I'd say.
All in all, album did not disappoint.

The Jungler
October 13th 2007



4827 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

If I'm not mistaken, DJ Shadow did drums for Airbag back in the day, which is really cool.

All in all, album did not disappoint.


Two-Headed Boy
October 13th 2007



4527 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

That's cool, since Thom Yorke apparently owes much of Radiohead's newer sound to DJ Shadow.

joshuatree
Emeritus
October 13th 2007



3743 Comments


Yeah, you should have been different and given it a 4.5. Much more hardcore.


wow, ur not an asshole.

good review, im kinda disappointed by the album though.

Sound
October 13th 2007



3889 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

[Quote=]6/8 drum machine beat[/Quote]

Factual error. It's 5/4 *


Never thought I would like this but this is actually pretty good, especially the second half of Weird Fishes is amazing.

The tracks 15 Step, Bodysnatchers, Weird Fishes/Arpeggi, All I Need, Reckoner and Videotape are pretty ace IMO.

Confessed2005
October 13th 2007



3314 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I guess a lot of people got, or are still getting, really excited about this.

I thought about getting Okay Computer but then decided I couldn't be bothered.

Monticello
October 13th 2007



805 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

That's just rude.

Electric City
Staff Reviewer
October 13th 2007



15732 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8 | Sound Off

What is?

Monticello
October 13th 2007



805 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Not being bothered to get OK Computer, but nevermind.

MrKite
October 13th 2007



5020 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Get it Confessed.

Electric City
Staff Reviewer
October 13th 2007



15732 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8 | Sound Off

They speak the truth.

FriendofTheDevil70
October 13th 2007



384 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Its a pretty good album, but there isn't a standout track or anything. Solid listen though.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy