Rush
2112


4.0
excellent

Review

by Insignia7 USER (6 Reviews)
March 17th, 2015 | 40 replies


Release Date: 1976 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Attention all planets of the Solar Federation: Rush have assumed control!

2112. What more to say about this album that hasn't already been said. This is an album that is iconic. This is an album that changed everything for Rush. This is album that put Rush on the musical map. It is a landmark album, a staple, and...kind of overrated.
I genuinely feel that 2112 is just given a little but too much credit, with many individuals citing it is one of the greatest albums of all-time (even though reviews at the release date if the album were extremely negative), when however (a there are better albums out there, even from Rush's own discography and (b this is not a perfect album.

I think the main problem with this album, is that it is very disjointed. Listen to side A, then listen to side B and tell me that they are not completely different. Every time I listen to the remaining 5 tracks, I always think to myself "Geez, I wonder if these are these outtakes from Caress Of Steel or something?". I know they're not, but they have that feel to it.

The song 2112 is the longest song that Rush has ever done, clocking in at about 20 and a half minutes long, taking up over half of the album. 2112 is a suite of 7 parts, telling the story set in the year 2112, when music is essentially banned, a man finds a guitar in the middle of nowhere. He shows it to the Priests Of The Temples Of Syrinx, who destroy it in anger. After being rejected, the man goes in hiding and commits suicide upon waking up, as he doesn't want to live in a world like this.
This song is extremely complex, with many twists and turns, keeping you interested from beginning to end and is one of Rush's best songs. 2112 isn't so much as a song, as it is a journey.

Side B is full of the shorter, radio-friendly songs. This was a result from the record company telling them to stop making long songs, after the commercial failure of Caress Of Steel (the tour of said album sold very few tickets and was jokingly named the 'Down The Tubes tour'). What Rush did in that regard is very clever, because they had side B full of songs the record company wanted and have side A the big long epic that Rush was still very fascinated with.
Probably my favourite song out of those remaining 5 tracks would be The Twilight Zone, because it is very melodic and somewhat dark. There are also references on this song, to episodes from the TV show of the same name, which had a big influence on pop culture.
The two weakest tracks would be Lessons and Tears. Not only are they a bit boring, but they are very similar songs, although Tears was Hugh Syme's first introduction with Rush.

Overall, 2112 is a bit overrated and a bit disjointed, but it's definitely not a bad release by any stretch of the imagination. This is a landmark album for the band, as they got the attention that they were hoping for. This album also marked the introduction of long-time artist, Hugh Syme, who is an iconic character in the musical universe.

BEST SONG/S:
2112
The Twilight Zone
Something For Nothing

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MY YOUTUBE REVIEW OF THIS ALBUM:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TbH_jBhpMw



Recent reviews by this author
Public Affection The Death Of A DictionaryTriptykon Eparistera Daimones
Rush Caress of SteelRush Fly by Night
Rush Rush
user ratings (2875)
4.3
superb
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
Frippertronics
Emeritus
March 17th 2015


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Review needs lots of work, especially with formatting and punctuation.



Talk less about the tours, artwork and the band - and more about the album itself. I agree this is very disjointed, but go into more detail about it. This review in general, is extremely lacking in both substance and quality.

VaxXi
March 17th 2015


4418 Comments


2112. What more to say about this album that hasn't already been said

Then why the hell did you write a review?

Frippertronics
Emeritus
March 17th 2015


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Honestly, I just can't get into Rush as much as the other prog rock giants. Their first live album is fuckin ace though.

VaxXi
March 17th 2015


4418 Comments


Im the opposite, Rush is one of the only few with a vocalist I can really tolerate. Which is weird because Geddy is shrilly as hell and I usually hate that.

Insignia7
March 17th 2015


38 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

If you actually read the review (which you obviously didn't read the whole thing), I never talked about the artwork for the album, the band performance or the tour for the album. I focused on the music for pretty much the whole review. In fact, the ONLY thing you are correct about is the punctuation. It is a case in which I need to stop typing so fast and I also have a terrible keyboard, so, yeah. I will tone the punctuation down.

Frippertronics
Emeritus
March 17th 2015


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

okay you got me there, but having a bad keyboard really isn't much of an excuse. I had a year-long period where I wrote decent reviews with several garbage USB keyboards because my laptop was an old piece of junk that never truly worked without coaxing it. But I am right about the formatting, so don't even try to avoid that. You got a ton of work to do, and I, along with others, are more than willing to help.



Go here from now on if you seriously care about the quality of your writing and claim to be a serious writer. This stuff is as amateur as it gets.



http://www.sputnikmusic.com/forums/showthread.php?t=577035

Insignia7
March 17th 2015


38 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

If I do more than one post a day, it will just piss everybody off.

Frippertronics
Emeritus
March 17th 2015


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Also, who is Hugh Symes and how is it relevant to the album and review?

Frippertronics
Emeritus
March 17th 2015


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

It's in the forums, not the review site. Just post your rough drafts in there, and someone will most likely take a look at it and give you suggestions.

VaxXi
March 17th 2015


4418 Comments


Ok, here are my two cents.

You didn't right a review, you wrote a little (empty) article about the album. You told us that you think it's overrated and isn't as good as other albums. But you didn't tell us which albums or why this album is overrated. You say the last few songs sound like rejects from Caress of Steel, but you don't explain why. You expect me, a person who may of never heard of that album. To fully understand why the last 5 tracks sound like they came from that one.

You told us side A had a long song, but you didnt talk about the song. Just told us it was very long. I could literally read a wikipedia article about this album and get more info on it's sound. You let me know that the song references The Twilight Zone... but I don't see how this makes it a good or a bad thing. All I see is "ohey it referenced something popular."

I could probably get more into how this "article" is very disjointed and unfocused. With you being all over the place and slapping off topic stuff to the end of certain sentences. How you only showed, didn't tell me shit about this album. And how this is less informative than a wikipedia article. But I wont... even though I kinda already did that.

SharkTooth
March 17th 2015


14922 Comments


If I do more than one post a day, it will just piss everybody off.
nobody's pissed off, they're just giving suggestions here

Insignia7
March 17th 2015


38 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

You know, maybe I should just leave this website. It seems as if I'm not wanted here.

Frippertronics
Emeritus
March 17th 2015


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Okay what? We're giving you valid suggestions, not death threats.

VaxXi
March 17th 2015


4418 Comments


Geeze, a few users give you some constructive criticism and you act like a baby about it. Do whatever you want I suppose.

ZackSh33
March 17th 2015


730 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

oof

Insignia7
March 17th 2015


38 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

It's nothing personal. I've just kind of lost interest. Maybe it's best if come back at a different time.

Frippertronics
Emeritus
March 17th 2015


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Do what you feel is best. If you're really gonna do that, work on that writing. Good luck.

Insignia7
March 17th 2015


38 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Will do.

sonictheplumber
March 17th 2015


17533 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

sweet

elcrawfodor
March 17th 2015


1267 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Insignia, no one in this thread is hating on you. All of the above comments make valid points, and I agree with all of them. Again, talk about how the music sounds, we don't glean any of that from this review. Your punctuation needs a lot of work, and stop inserting yourself into your reviews. Constructive criticism is only good if you respond to it and you incorporate it. No reason for you to leave, lots of friendly folks around here will help you with your writing, but it requires an equal effort on your part to learn from our feedback and improve.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy