Circle Takes the Square Decompositions: Volume Number One
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
oltnabrick
January 3rd 2013


32266 Comments


yeah its really good

Digging: Delhi Escorts - Delhi Escorts

TheNexus100
January 3rd 2013


2696 Comments


id like it more if the lyrics weren't so awful

oltnabrick
January 3rd 2013


32266 Comments


u r a terrible person

fromtheinside
January 3rd 2013


19389 Comments


i dunno, i thought the newer songs sucked ass. i was ultimately bored by this. maybe it's a grower?

Xenophanes
Staff Reviewer
January 3rd 2013


10703 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Whoa where you been?

Digging: Imperial Triumphant - Abyssal Gods

fromtheinside
January 3rd 2013


19389 Comments


ha, i've been popping my head in here and there essentially creating a catalog of your reviews that's
now given me this nightmare of links to plow through. but i could never pass up some (!)new ctts
action

MadKungFu
January 3rd 2013


375 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

"hyperbolic claim"

toxin.
January 3rd 2013


12843 Comments


"so you're trying to tell me that I can't a develop a game of 4 minutes and 33 seconds of standing in an empty room?"

underappreciated comment
+1 from me


auberginedreams
January 3rd 2013


6081 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

just out of curiosity, how is it determined which releases get the "best new music" label? because

i've seen a bunch of staff reviews that give 4.0-4.5s and don't get BNM, but then this is a 3.5 and it

does. just wondering because i've been confused about it for awhile.

Omaha
Staff Reviewer
January 3rd 2013


10416 Comments


Really don't care for this, although the second half's way more interesting.

fromtheinside
January 3rd 2013


19389 Comments


there's such a sudden change in style with the production for the second half, to give it a more
"raw" effect, that i'm completely turned off. also it's absurdly sloppy even for ctts standards.

auberginedreams
January 3rd 2013


6081 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

what are you talking about, this is wayyyy less raw or "sloppy" than ATRU and much more cleanly

produced than anything else they've done. not saying it's better (i still prefer ATRU even though i

love this) but you're comment doesn't make much sense.

Deviant.
Staff Reviewer
January 3rd 2013


31782 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

just out of curiosity, how is it determined which releases get the "best new music" label? because i've seen a bunch of staff reviews that give 4.0-4.5s and don't get BNM, but then this is a 3.5 and it does. just wondering because i've been confused about it for awhile.




It's something like if 3 staff members rate an album 4 or higher it becomes "best new music"

Digging: Phace - Shape The Random

Deviant.
Staff Reviewer
January 3rd 2013


31782 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Just looking at the ratings page, it might be a 3.5 instead

fromtheinside
January 3rd 2013


19389 Comments


did i say it was more raw than atru? in fact, did i compare any of this to atru? or perhaps the albums halves?

Trebor.
Contributing Reviewer
January 3rd 2013


51134 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Like half this album is just whatever

fromtheinside
January 3rd 2013


19389 Comments


someone gets a gold star

auberginedreams
January 3rd 2013


6081 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

the production is the same throughout the album though...

foxxxythnksustnk
January 4th 2013


2132 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

5/5

Aids
January 4th 2013


24170 Comments


"Here's the thing about Decompositions: IT'S THE ALBUM ALL THEIR FANS HAVE BEEN WANTING THEM TO MAKE FOR 7 YEARS"

oh god lmao

Digging: Waxahatchee - Ivy Tripp



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy