The Mars Volta
Amputechture


1.5
very poor

Review

by UncalledFor USER (5 Reviews)
September 30th, 2007 | 43 replies


Release Date: 2006 | Tracklist

Review Summary: "What's new?"

"What's new?"

A question I might have liked an answer to before ascending into a series of highly improvisational rock suites by cult heroes The Mars Volta. "Not much" would have to be an understatement of the severe shape they are in here. Where is this "progressiveness" I keep hearing so much about? How is 17 minutes of scales that don't actually go together (Tetragrammaton) going to amount to any progression in the world we call music? That's merely a gimmick. Béla Bartók was miles ahead of that nearly a century ago.
In order to be progressive, you've got to know what you're up against. Zappa & Mothers, Voivod, Mr. Bungle, The Beatles, The Jesus lizard, Radiohead, Led Zeppellin and Meshuggah are just a few of many bands that pushed boundaries in rock/funk/metal, and in comparison, Mars Volta's experiments are kept cautiously close to familiar grounds far too often. Most of their fabled jams are in a comfortable 4/4 or 6/8 and based off a perfectly tonal chord sequence. It doesn't take musicians of this caliber to hit dissonant notes at a steady rate in such an environment. The result is vanity, musicians showing off the cool stuff they can do, without connecting anything to anything.

Particularly embarrassing is El ciervo vulnerado, 9 minutes of NOTHING. Melody? Riffage? Some chords perhaps? Nope, none are present, just dicking around with synths and tepid guitar licks to create some sort of soundscape. Background music. I guess I should follow the vocals then - that Cedric sounds pretty serious and passionate about his stuff.
Quote:
Originally Posted by El ciervo vulnerado
if you consume me i will not let you go
if you walk right through me
my voice will taint your throat
blessed be the wrong i've done
Who the heck buys that? I'm not going to look for any hidden meaning in what is obviously a load of crap. If you're going to just randomly throw lyrics together, at least have the dignity to apply a sense of humour into the performance. But Cedric so firmly believes in his crusade against using "humans as ornaments" (Meccamputechture), it's gullible - not a good kind of funny to be.

I'll freely admit that there is one jam they didn't wank to shreds, which is Day of the Baphomets. I like how it goes from Dave Brubeckiness to a total rockfest that really packs a punch. That stuff is excellent, yeah, THAT stuff is! Why is this kind of intensity so damn rare here? Do they have their heads too far up their bums to say "fellows, that jam session kinda blew" every once in a while?

Some rays of hope are Vermicide a decent ballad with a pretty convincingly psycho interlude, and anthemic outro - all this in a modest 4m 15s, and Asilos Magdalena which features some beautiful flamenco ditties, and an actually nuancated performance from Cedric. Of course some ambienty synth strings had to be added in case someone hadn't noticed it was supposed to be the "sad song" of the album. Viscera eyes literally taunts me - so at least mr. Omar didn't actually LOSE his talent of writing an excellent guitar-drum duet with intelligent and catchy hooks (see Eriatarka off De-Loused in the comatorium for a very fine example). There are some gorgeous riffs and leads on this track, the vocal lines are as dramatically Carmina Burana-like as ever though. FINALLY some enticing drums! Then Omar going Satriani for three boring minutes, and it builds up to an awkward implosion.

A 1.5/5 for this album is pretty fair, considering over 90% of it is a poor excuse for prog rock, and of the 10% more or less memorable bits of music, 8% gets overshadowed by that 90%, which leaves 2% of good music, amounting to a 0.4/5. I rounded up. If you are reading this, Omar: smoke some of the stuff that makes your buddy write about girls with guts for eyes, and put that kind of silly whackiness into the friggin' music!


user ratings (2487)
3.6
great
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
Yyy
October 1st 2007


289 Comments


Most of their fabled jams are in a comfortable 4/4 or 6/8 and based off a perfectly tonal chord sequence.
What fags!

Thor
October 1st 2007


10355 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

You can't say the n-word.

UncalledFor
October 1st 2007


100 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Silly me, I overcalculated.

Intransit
October 1st 2007


2797 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Are you gay?

Acre
October 1st 2007


847 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Way to tell it like it is, homes.



Though I have started to appreciate some of the songs here in a new light (Viscera Eyes is one of my new favorites), songs like El Ciervo Vulnerado and Meccamputechture's last half are just unexcusable.

IsItLuck?
Emeritus
October 1st 2007


4957 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

2nd'ed

Intransit
October 1st 2007


2797 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

lol grundle

DerMond
October 1st 2007


126 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

this review delivers.

cometuesday
October 1st 2007


959 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I'm not going to look for any hidden meaning in what is obviously a load of crap.


I'd nix this if you haven't already read up on the album's concept.

Placing my personal opinion aside, the structure of the review is a little awkward and a lot of times it seems like you're just bashing the album for the sake of doing so.

I'm not going to argue with you for rating it as a 1.5, but if you're going to rate it that low you really have to defend your opinion a little better. Maybe work on your paragraphs and spread some content, maybe throw in a better conclusion and I will still disagree with you but I will respect the review. :P

AtavanHalen
October 1st 2007


17919 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Your username fits this review perfectly.

Skyler
October 1st 2007


1084 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

This album is good for a few minutes here and there.

any14doomsday
October 1st 2007


681 Comments


your rating is a little low, but I agree with you 100%, only I feel that way about everything they have done.

This band is just noisy technical playing, all for the sake of noisy technical playing.

Confessed2005
October 1st 2007


5568 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

This was a disappointing release but it does redeem itself on a couple of tracks, particularly Day of the Baphomets.

hahacharadeyouare
October 1st 2007


17 Comments


you missed pink floyd in your list


i think is a good album to hear when you walk through a park, i liked it ^^

Geedrummer
October 1st 2007


607 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

i hate u.



no not really , but this album kiks ass. its just not as good as their 2 other albums, but it did have a lot to live up to

Serpento
October 1st 2007


2351 Comments


Sup hyperboleking.

gimo80
October 1st 2007


260 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

This album is actually really good, so I'm going to have to say that your review is WRONG.

Only joking. Well, kind of. Yeah.

UncalledFor
October 1st 2007


100 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

[quote=cometuesday]

I'd nix this if you haven't already read up on the album's concept.



Placing my personal opinion aside, the structure of the review is a little awkward and a lot of times it seems like you're just bashing the album for the sake of doing so.



I'm not going to argue with you for rating it as a 1.5, but if you're going to rate it that low you really have to defend your opinion a little better. Maybe work on your paragraphs and spread some content, maybe throw in a better conclusion and I will still disagree with you but I will respect the review. :P[/quote]



As far as I've looked into this album, there is no (lyrical) concept to it and Cedric has even admitted in an interview that he settles with nonsense if other people come up with generous interpretations for it.



I gotta say that comment doesn't really give me anything - I'm clearly not bashing this for the sake of bashing, in fact I pointed out as much of the good stuff I could find. If you can tell me what exactly makes the structure awkward to you, I might understand what you mean.



[quote=hahacharadeyouare]you missed pink floyd in your list[/quote]



Yeah, among a dozen others.



[quote=serpento]Sup hyperboleking.[/quote]



No. Prove how this review shows his level of thickheadedness.

Serpento
October 1st 2007


2351 Comments


[quote=review]In order to be progressive, you've got to know what you're up against. Zappa & Mothers, Voivod, Mr. Bungle, The Beatles, The Jesus lizard, Radiohead, Led Zeppellin and Meshuggah are just a few of many bands that pushed boundaries in rock/funk/metal, and in comparison, Mars Volta's experiments are kept cautiously close to familiar grounds far too often.[/quote] So "progressive" as a genre isn't such if you only play well, instead of making a major breakthrough? [quote=review]Who the heck buys that? I'm not going to look for any hidden meaning in what is obviously a load of crap. If you're going to just randomly throw lyrics together, at least have the dignity to apply a sense of humour into the performance.[/quote]

Maybe not thickheadedness, but close-minded to boot.

Serpento
October 1st 2007


2351 Comments


EDIT: I love when I contradict myself. It makes me look really stupid.This Message Edited On 10.01.07



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy