| Full Review | Ratings (355) |
Give your Rating |
2.5 average | GamamJ | August 17th 20 | Started off good, but is waaaaaay too monotonous. Brutal, techy/wannky and fast, but nothing more. Has potential, but basically follows a structure of pure wank for a few minutes, then breakdowns for the rest of the track.
Bump |
4.0 excellent | branflakes911 | October 9th 11 | This album has about as many ideas as the EP that preceded it, but it's almost twice as long. it suffers from the same tedium that many hyper-technical offerings do, though it only just strays over the line. It's redemption lies in the quantity of bizarre and surprising riffs and rhythms that abound, which make it well worth listening though the more boring parts.
Bump |
4.5 superb | hipnotoad | January 20th 10 | This album really surprised me. I'm really not into BDM that focuses primarily on either being absurdly fast, or overly technical. It just so happens that Beneath the Massacre, and this album in particular do just that. At first I didn't really like this album, in fact I found it quite average, all the songs just sounded like noise, and the album as a whole was very repetitive, but then something clicked, I suddenly grasped everything, and what I heard was truly amazing.
Bump |
1.5 very poor | JES | February 4th 09 | Technicality has become an obsession for this band. To an extent that degrades the quality of their music. For the first EP, this was ok, but by now, I'm sick of hearing the same song over and over again. As Adam Thomas said on his review for 'Dystopia' "Its almost as though sometime in between writing the tweedle-tweedle-tweedle and the dun-dun-dun they forgot that they were supposed to be writing actual songs." Sums it up perfectly for me!
Bump |
4.0 excellent | 541core | November 18th 08 | Beneath the Massacre has gotten a very cold reception, primarily for their use of breakdowns. If you haven't heard BTM, and you don't like breakdowns, don't listen to them. On the other hand, if you like hardcore/metalcore and you don't like death metal, it's definitely not for you. Even if you fall somewhere in the middle like me, the technicality and speed can be very overwhelming. I didn't know what to think the first time I hear Mechanics of Dysfunction, I didn't like it. I couldn't wrap my head around it. It was seemingly a fast and heavy death metal noisecore. It IS however an acquired taste. If you're a fan of the deathcore genre, which this cannot be truly classified as, or if you like technical deathcore, give it a week of straight listen and there's a chance you might like it as much as me.
Bump |
2.0 poor | whatduffhuck7 | January 11th 08 | This album, unlike there EP, is very repetitive. Grind core from front to back with no breaks. A systems failure is a standout but other than that i would rather listen to their EP
Bump |
5.0 classic | Kalypso | October 24th 23 |
2.0 poor | 2ool | April 14th 21 |
4.5 superb | Arolde | July 15th 20 |
2.0 poor | Pon EMERITUS | April 30th 20 |
3.0 good | tellah | March 31st 20 |
4.0 excellent | YUJOS | February 23rd 20 |
4.0 excellent | canczar | February 22nd 20 |
4.5 superb | idjit | October 2nd 15 |
4.0 excellent | "Tab" | February 28th 15 |
3.5 great | em17ah | February 20th 15 |
3.5 great | slaps | December 17th 14 |
3.0 good | Mercy | September 20th 14 |
3.0 good | Henry | June 12th 14 |
2.5 average | Thibs | April 21st 14 |
3.0 good | Fujay | April 20th 14 |
3.0 good | zundza | December 24th 13 |
3.5 great | groov | April 9th 13 |
3.0 good | brunch | March 11th 13 |
2.5 average | CK | December 17th 12 |
3.5 great | N2B3J | December 1st 12 |
2.5 average | Dev518 | October 4th 12 |
3.5 great | TBliss2 | February 27th 12 |
2.5 average | mcchub | February 25th 12 |
4.0 excellent | joec101 | February 17th 12 |
3.0 good | MTTS | February 10th 12 |
2.0 poor | Andrew | January 8th 12 |
3.5 great | HiLion | October 22nd 11 |
2.0 poor | JJwins | September 12th 11 |
3.5 great | CutMan | March 18th 11 |
3.0 good | Mauler | November 22nd 10 |
2.0 poor | Curse. | October 24th 10 |
2.5 average | MO | October 20th 10 |
3.0 good | IRAI | June 7th 10 |
4.0 excellent | bosty | May 23rd 10 |
3.5 great | vdop | May 2nd 10 |
3.5 great | lakku | April 26th 10 |
4.0 excellent | GhostK | April 9th 10 |
3.0 good | asaf | April 6th 10 |
3.0 good | xDANKx | March 31st 10 |
4.0 excellent | RAGE12 | March 8th 10 |
3.5 great | met65 | February 15th 10 |
2.5 average | drewkar | January 3rd 10 |
2.0 poor | pride | November 14th 09 |
4.5 superb | Guiller | October 30th 09 |
3.0 good | GodFree | September 30th 09 |
3.5 great | Robewho | September 10th 09 |
2.5 average | X3ni92 | August 16th 09 |
3.5 great | tomr4 | August 11th 09 |
4.5 superb | Goup09 | June 9th 09 |
2.5 average | DrReg | June 6th 09 |
3.0 good | TBliss | December 1st 08 |
5.0 classic | Medika | September 20th 08 |
4.5 superb | Agriath | September 2nd 08 |
3.0 good | mikev | August 3rd 08 |
3.0 good | RyanM | March 21st 08 |
3.5 great | beans | December 21st 07 |
2.5 average | Valhall | December 21st 07 |
4.0 excellent | cooperaa | December 12th 07 |
3.0 good | rid | December 5th 07 |
4.0 excellent | tyjimma | November 14th 07 |
5.0 classic | Salami | September 25th 07 |
3.5 great | Jmaj14 | September 12th 07 |
2.5 average | Tyler EMERITUS | February 19th 07 |
| |
Give Your Opinion on Mechanics of Dysfunction
|