| | Full Review | Ratings (301) |
Give your Rating |
| 3.5 great | portableheadd | October 21st 16 |
Embarrased to admit this is a guilty pleasure of mine, can't help but loving the chaos and screams.
Bump |
| 2.0 poor | Jared Floryan | March 24th 15 |
Sometimes when an apple falls and attacks the tree, you have to wonder if the latter was actually this album. In Vogue is an indistinguishable mess of a debut record, suffering from quite a number of trends that became popular around this time; you like bizarre song titles which don't allude to the poorly-written lyrics? Drop Dead, Gorgeous have that covered. How about the lack of variation within the otherwise decent instrumentation? But oh wait, I almost forgot... Does the combination of whiny clean vocals and aggravating screams tickle your fancy? {sigh} As muddy as the production is on the release, I think it manages to help many of the problems (though not by much).
Bump |
| 1.0 awful | walrusgod | November 13th 13 |
Incomprehensible screaming? Check.
Nearly incomprehensible singing? Check.
Jackhammer drums and "heavy" guitar playing with almost no variation? Check.
This album should be given as a counter-example if anyone complains about the genericness of
any other metal/metalcore album. A truly difficult and painful listen in the worst way
imaginable.
Bump |
| 2.0 poor | RedHorizon | July 27th 13 |
This is basically your typical mid-to-late 2000s post-hardcore/emo/screamo album by some strangely named band from some lesser known part of the USA (Well, even if it is a big city, Denver was not a big musical hotspot until very recently). Nothing really stands out here: annoying whinny vocals, distinguishable guitar playing repetitive chords, bland rhythm section, poorly written/confusing lyrics, and an unequal sound production. Not worth a listen.
Bump |
| 2.5 average | efp123 | January 22nd 24 |
| 4.0 excellent | mCihhh | September 3rd 23 |
| 1.5 very poor | iGuter | September 2nd 23 |
| 3.5 great | Halez | June 1st 23 |
| 4.0 excellent | kevbogz | August 2nd 21 |
| 2.5 average | vult | October 31st 19 |
| 1.5 very poor | AndSalx | March 8th 18 |
| 1.5 very poor | dctarga | August 10th 17 |
| 4.0 excellent | El Olam | December 18th 16 |
| 2.5 average | Henry | August 25th 16 |
| 5.0 classic | wwba | August 6th 14 |
| 3.5 great | Sebe | February 1st 14 |
| 1.5 very poor | dirty69 | July 16th 13 |
| 1.5 very poor | Shimana | December 19th 12 |
| 1.0 awful | Pndi | August 2nd 12 |
| 2.5 average | vinceG | March 8th 12 |
| 4.0 excellent | moetheG | July 18th 11 |
| 2.5 average | AdamK | May 30th 11 |
| 4.0 excellent | mfp | March 1st 11 |
| 1.5 very poor | Dev518 | November 10th 10 |
| 3.0 good | IN64 | October 1st 10 |
| 1.5 very poor | Torgol | October 1st 10 |
| 4.0 excellent | LordPH | July 26th 10 |
| 3.0 good | lamy | May 20th 10 |
| 3.0 good | musick | March 27th 10 |
| 2.5 average | beezay | December 12th 09 |
| 2.0 poor | UO910 | November 24th 09 |
| 2.5 average | mkCII | November 9th 09 |
| 1.5 very poor | HiFiPi | October 20th 09 |
| 5.0 classic | vkeifan | October 9th 09 |
| 2.5 average | jd234 | August 26th 09 |
| 3.5 great | seares | July 21st 09 |
| 1.5 very poor | X3ni92 | July 20th 09 |
| 2.5 average | ebay | July 16th 09 |
| 1.5 very poor | Matte | July 8th 09 |
| 4.0 excellent | dredq | June 17th 09 |
| 1.5 very poor | Groink | November 28th 08 |
| 4.5 superb | Kylion | November 23rd 08 |
| 4.5 superb | Warborn | October 26th 08 |
| 2.5 average | bigmo99 | September 25th 08 |
| 1.0 awful | morjens | September 23rd 08 |
| 3.0 good | HxSxB | April 27th 08 |
| 3.0 good | MelBel | January 4th 08 |
| 3.0 good | TimmyK | December 31st 07 |
| 1.5 very poor | kalkal50 | November 15th 07 |
| 1.0 awful | B10z | September 5th 07 |
| |
Give Your Opinion on In Vogue
|
