">
 

King Crimson
Larks' Tongues in Aspic


3.0
good

Review

by hahaha USER (1 Reviews)
January 14th, 2005 | 23 replies


Release Date: 1973 | Tracklist


King Crimson-Lark's Tongue in Aspic

The title should give it all away. This is one of the more pretentious albums that King Crimson released. Having said that, there are many lovely moments on this album which make it one of my favorites.

On this album, King Crimson are...
Robert Fripp-guitar/mellotron
David Cross-violin/mellotron
John Wetton-bass/vocals
Bill Bruford-Percussion
Jamie Muir-Percussion

Having released "In the Court of the Crimson King" (1969), "In the Wake of Posiedon" (1970ish) and "Islands" (And I really have no idea when that was released), Robert Fripp was looking for a different sound. He removed the brass instruments and mellotron (almost a signature sound of the last three releases) from the mix and instead went for a pared-down avant garde sound.


LTIA (part 1)
This is a hugely disjointed track. It begins with a buildup of what sounds like xylophones, with natural harmonics on the bass guitar and some other kind of percussion being added to the mix as it progresses. Musically, this is a very clever section, with polyrhythms and complex harmonies building tension. Unfortunately, it comes across (even after repeated listens) as a load of plinking. This gives way to David Cross' violin playing staccato notes, and Robert Fripp's guitar playing being fairly scary and incredibly heavy. This is again built upon with Jamie Muir doing a very good impression of falling down stairs (and then landing on the bike at the bottom as he starts messing around with horns). After this, Fripp plays a bunch of random notes. Lovely. The bass comes to the fore, playing another heavy part (through a distortion that I've only ever heard John Wetton use, and I have no idea how to do it, which is a pity because it sounds great). After this, David Cross' violin launches the piece in yet another completely different direction, and he starts playing a beautiful solo, which transits nicely into the next song... (2/5. Points off for sheer wankdom, points on for the fact that it, like all King
Crimson, it has its moments.)

Book of Saturday
This, being a song which flows well and so forth, is probably my favorite on the album. It opens with a riff without distortion, and then John Wetton begins singing. I love John Wetton's voice. It's kinda like Peter Gabriel-by no means perfect, but perfect is boring. Violin suppourts the guitar well, and the percussion is perfectly understated (not something you can usually say about Jamie Muir). Robert Fripp's famous backward guitar solo is lovely, and the whole song adds up to brilliantness (if that makes any sense. It doesn't. Ah well.) (5/5)

Exiles
Another ballad. Like the early King Crimson, this is full of mellotron. It starts off with some wierd noises, and then the mellotron comes in playing some kind of minor key thingimy, which is joined later by the violin. When the violin come in, it switches from minor to major, and this part always sends shivers down my spine, which is cool. The rest is mostly Jonh Wetton's lovely voice being lovely, and the Robert Fripp does a great solo which rocks. Yay. (4/5)

Easy Money
This song begins with a heavy guitar part being held together by David Cross playing mellotron, and some fairly simple drumming which goes well with the music. Then the instruments drop out, and we're left with just vocals. Then the instruments start plinking. You'd think that they'd have learned after moonchild but no. However, with the vocals, it sounds good because there is a tune involved which is always nice. Then they start to improvise, and this fades out to reveal a sound like a fly trapped inside a jam jar. I seriously think that King Crimson got bored a lot in the studio and started messing around and then just decided to stick it on the album. It's the only explanation for a lot of stuff. However, this improvised bit is good up until the fly. And live, it's even better. Check out the version on USA. (3/5)

The Talking Drum
Lots of people dismiss this track as boring, but I personally think it's the best build-up track I've heard. It starts with some odd drumming and then the bass cmes in with a very simple riff. By the end of the song, the guitar and violin are trading lines off each other and it sounds wonderful. Then the customary explosion leads us into... (5/5 by the way)

LTIA (part 2)
This is a lot better than the first. For a start it has structure. It starts with one chord played over and over again by Fripp, and then the bass comes in, and Jamie Muir is doing some stuff, and then it suddenly drops in tempo and volume, and Robert Fripp is playing in 5/4 while everyone else plays 4/4, which gives an interesting effect. This happens a few times, and then some more stuff happens, and John Wetton plays some amazing bass fills, and then there's a huge climax which I never get to hear because my version is on tape, and that bit got cut off. (5/5)

I think this is a fairly hit-and-miss album, with parts being great, and other parts being plain boring. However, that is to be expected from an album with so much improvisation. I give it a 3/5 because I have to be in the right mood to listen to it.


user ratings (1586)
4.3
superb
other reviews of this album
1 of
  • e210013 (4)
    This is an album that represents another incarnation of King Crimson. It’s one of the mo...

    Nagrarok (4)
    The Crimson King invites you to the dark and disturbing......

    Ryus (4.5)
    Ersatz shit?...

    ValiumMan (4.5)
    LTIA still stands as a daring, experimental effort, a step in a bold new direction and, ul...

  • NightmareCinema16 (4)
    King Crimson strikes back, this time, with a new lineup....



Comments:Add a Comment 
IvortheEngineDriver
July 11th 2004


164 Comments


Good review! :thumb: Great album, one of my faves!

owlandtree
July 17th 2004


47 Comments


My all-time favorite King Crimson album. 5outta5!

Neon Dub
July 18th 2004


13 Comments


Yeah, great album

I also love the Talking Drum, I don't understand either why KC fans find it boring.

Jigglypuff
July 18th 2004


31 Comments


[QUOTE=Neon Dub]Yeah, great album

I also love the Talking Drum, I don't understand either why KC fans find it boring.[/QUOTE]

I don't find it boring at all, but I don't see how anyone could consider this review to be "good". It really doesn't explain much about the album that you couldn't find out just by listening. No research and all useless play-by-play.

Good album. Not KC's best, but still a solid effort. 4/5.

Manimal
July 18th 2004


9 Comments


Uhh, that would be the whole point of a review....to know what the albums like before you drop 15 bucks to get it?

neoli II
July 18th 2004


1 Comments


um... great review!!! :thumb:


...

Zappa
July 19th 2004


355 Comments


[QUOTE=Manimal]Uhh, that would be the whole point of a review....to know what the albums like before you drop 15 bucks to get it?[/QUOTE]

I wholeheartedly agree. Having random factoids about band members or how the album was recorded are not going to tell anyone whether they should buy it or not.

Led_Zeppelin678
February 15th 2006


2 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I completely disagree with your dismissal of Larks' Pt. 1 as being "sheer wankdom". I've had the album for about a month and a half, and it's already one of my favorite instrumentals.

ktstein
February 15th 2006


459 Comments


I have a guitar lesson book written by Robert Fripp...I had no idea he was the brains behind Crimson...AWESOME!!

Rocksta71
July 1st 2006


1023 Comments


Looks good, I just ordered In the court of the crimson king and I can't wait for it to come!

kingsoby1
Emeritus
October 15th 2006


4970 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Disagree, but good review. This is my favorite KK album.

GoodTimes
October 29th 2006


4 Comments


This is also my favorite King Crimson album. Bruford starts transforming into a somehow even better drummer than he was in YES. I think Crimson's strongest part is Fripp never seems to really take any Crimson line up into a cheesy direction as some similiar bands have done. All though if you really want to get technical King Crimson is more like 6 fairly different bands over the years at this point that all have Robert Fripp. Listen to every King Crimson album, it's all rather strong material that takes some unexpected directions.

Rocksta71
November 21st 2006


1023 Comments


Does anybody else have a problem with the volume of the vocals on "lizard" and"Red", they are just too quiet for my liking (why have good lyrics is you can never hear them anyway?)

Rocksta71
November 29th 2006


1023 Comments


^Oh sorry I just didn't turn the volume up high enough.

MrKite
February 12th 2007


5020 Comments


I really like the title track. My dads picking either this up or ITCOTCK.
Does this band still record stuff?This Message Edited On 02.12.07

pulseczar
February 12th 2007


2385 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Yeah they still record. And this is the best Crimson album no doubt.

pixiesfanyo
February 12th 2007


1223 Comments


It is a KC classic.

Pig on the wing
June 2nd 2007


25 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I have to disagree about Lark's Tongue Part 1, being as it is one of my favourite songs in existence (and about 7th favourite including the non-existent). My only problem with it is the intro; it could be a tiny bit shorter.

KILL
August 18th 2012


81580 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

this review sucks balls!!!!!!!11111111111111111111111111

JokineAugustus
July 7th 2013


10938 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Was BTBAM influenced by these guys thhan?



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy