Rotten Sound
Cursed


2.0
poor

Review

by Telekinetic USER (12 Reviews)
May 7th, 2015 | 15 replies


Release Date: 2011 | Tracklist

Review Summary: This is a band that still has plenty of steam but seems to not use it for reasons I cannot fathom

After the release of their landmark LP Exit, Rotten Sound made it clear that they knew they needed to change. They understood that it was an impossible task to try and top Exit with the same approach. These changes included a new approach to songwriting with much more diversity, and a new sound that was still “rotten.” This lead to Cycles, another group of ideas and songs that were mostly solid hits on the target.

While there are eerie similarities to Cycles such as the glossed over production, Cursed is another change for Rotten Sound. It may not be as big as the change Cycles was but it definitely was a change. It appears they intended not to perfect Cycles but to go in a slightly different direction. First of all there is a new utilization of mid-tempo ranges (the songs Addict and Execute come to mind first). The use of the Vocoder that was on Cycles every now and then is gone. Finally and most importantly, this is also their most aggressive sounding record to date.

So now this leads to the excellent question based on the rating "what went wrong?" Nothing that is easy to hear upon the first couple of listens. The main reason why the album seems fantastic on the first few listens is because of the phenomenal production and has really outdone Cycles in that matter. Another reason the album will seem so fantastic at first is because of the new utilization of these mid-tempo beats which really do add a lot of power the songs. But after those first few listens and the fantastic production wears off, the songwriting shows its weak spots, many weak spots. Almost all of the songs lack song structure or have very generic song structure, especially for the standards of Rotten Sound. The slow moments are also resorted to way too much. While it is okay for there to be slowed down moments, they have used them very distastefully on Cursed as opposed to Cycles. It is very easy to tell that these songs while written with a ton of new ideas are sloppily put together with lack of thought which is a real disappointment because every single one of these songs had potential and occasionally shows it easily but they never last.


While it is understandable for a band to not quite live up to a previous release, it would be expected of a band with such talent to at least try to have the next release live up to its predecessor. Rotten Sound while adding new ideas to this album and still having large aspirations, they have gotten lazy with their ideas and have decided to hide behind fantastic production to add non-lasting power to their music.



Recent reviews by this author
Deafheaven New BermudaPriapus/Old Painless Split
Napalm Death Apex Predator - Easy MeatMaruta Remain Dystopian
Ne Obliviscaris CitadelMouth Of The Architect The Ties That Blind
user ratings (213)
3.5
great
other reviews of this album
Jacob818Hollows (4)
With blazing guitars and insane beatdown blastbeats, Rotten Sound delivers a surprisingly thoughtful...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Telekinetic
May 7th 2015


82 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

First Negative review, had to get this off my chest

Telekinetic
May 7th 2015


82 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Need to edit this has major Arguments that collapse over themselves

SomeGuyDude
May 8th 2015


377 Comments


He meant HIS first negative review.

I'm torn. I agree that it's not really bringing anything new after the landmarks of Cycles and Murderworks, but it's really, REALLY well done. I can't really agree with putting a 2 on it just because it doesn't reach the heights of previous. Not every album needs to reinvent the wheel.

Relinquished
May 8th 2015


48718 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

yea still rules even though nothing new

Telekinetic
May 8th 2015


82 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

I really was not pleased primarily because of the lack of or overly simplistic structures and saw that as laziness



Plus I only give the rating I give an album based on how much I enjoyed it because it's hard to objectively put a number on a album For me

Hopelust
May 8th 2015


3613 Comments


Sorry, but I'm going to have to neg this review.

Numerous grammatical mistakes are scattered throughout this piece, on top of your opinion being glaringly obvious as just an opinion. Generally, when you're writing, you want to try and convince the reader of what you're saying. When you're saying "There seems to be" this and "It feels as if" that, your argument becomes less and less convincing. You even write it back to back in one paragraph:

"Nothing in theory but there seems to be something very hollow about the album once you have given it a few listens. There seems to be no new ideas presented on this album which Isn't in most cases a bad thing in all cases but there is more to the story."

You've got a few sentences that don't make a ton of sense, including:

"There seems to be no new ideas presented on this album which Isn't in most cases a bad thing in all cases but there is more to the story"

You don't need to say 'in most cases... in all cases'

"Cursed has much to offer as an album the production is still that unique glossed over side that Cycles had"

There could be a period in here somewhere. What do you mean by 'that unique glossed over side?'

"this is still the same Rotten Sound that has been around for almost at the time 20 years."

almost at the time 20 years?? What?

I won't point out all the minor grammatical mistakes because I can assume you can read this through and spot them, but yeah, this could have used a few proof-reads. I get the general idea of what you're trying to say about the album, and it being production-focused rather than song writing focused. Unfortunately, it's not delivered in a solid manner, argumentatively.





Hopelust
May 8th 2015


3613 Comments


You even use "seems to" in the summary. I count 4 "it seems" sentences in the whole review.

Telekinetic
May 8th 2015


82 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

I understand your point I slap stocked this together in like 30 minutes without thinking my argument through I will porably rewrite it

Telekinetic
May 8th 2015


82 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Although thanks for the critiques I'll get to working on them also lesson learned never wright a review on a smart phone

Telekinetic
May 8th 2015


82 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

I also might change it to a 2.5 or 3 I was just really disappointed in this

Hopelust
May 8th 2015


3613 Comments


"Although thanks for the critiques I'll get to working on them also lesson learned never wright a review on a smart phone"

Yes. lol. Don't ever write a review on a smart phone. I usually write in a word processing program and give several read-throughs before copying and pasting on to this site.


Telekinetic
May 10th 2015


82 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

hopefully a much more clear presentation on what I think of this album

Telekinetic
May 10th 2015


82 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

can't be fixed on any other day but mothers day, tragic

Raz0rGrind23
May 18th 2015


464 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I can see why this would deserve a neg but this still kills imo. by far their weakest but still badass. I still love it

Raz0rGrind23
May 18th 2015


464 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Species At War is fucking solid



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy