Taylor Swift
1989


4.5
superb

Review

by Peter USER (101 Reviews)
November 4th, 2014 | 9 replies


Release Date: 2014 | Tracklist

Review Summary: All that hype that was massively building up for Taylor Swift's fifth studio LP was certainly worth it all.

Creative. Fantastic. Transcending. Completely unexpected. Worth the hype. That's just some of the few things you can certainly describe from country-turned-pop artist Taylor Swift's latest endeavour in her fifth studio album 1989. After her fourth LP in 2012 which wasn't Taylor's finest piece of work, you wondered if Swift wasn't pushing herself to the maximum potential that she is capable of with her passionate, heartfelt vocals and songwriting capabilities. Her first official "pop" album, Swift completely moves on from the country roots that helped boost her into one of music's biggest stars and embraces her pop side which has mostly been where Swift has hit her best strides with previous hits like "22” and “We're Never Getting Back Together”. The result of that decision is a 16-track LP that is undeniably enjoyable, even for non-pop fans or Taylor Swift fans for that perspective. One that deserves some ATOY conversation almost certainly, and one that deserves a standing ovation.

This isn't just any typical pop album you would normally see like from a Selena Gomez or from a Demi Lovato. This doesn't sound like a normal pop album targeted towards the massive tween and teenage audience. It helps transcend pop music to a level that hasn't been seen in years due to the influctuation of generic boy bands or female vocalists who aren't any different from the rest of the industry. What 1989 is rather is a pop LP that is bombarded by what is easily Swift's best material in her stacked music career that all sounds refreshing and filled with dynamic, explosive energy. It's pretty prominent as soon as you hear the first track “Welcome To New York”, with a melody that sounds undeniably like an '80s pop song yet playful and entertaining. This LP is immersed mostly in '80s synth-pop: it's clearly visible in tracks such as the first track and others like “All You Had To Do Was Stay” and “Wildest Dreams”. While those examples do showcase Swift's route in her music, it isn't put together any more better than it did for “Out Of The Woods”. This track is easily one of the best overall tracks on this record, with an hook that is unbelievably catchy and not annoying with the immense amount of repetition with the sole lyrics of “Are we out of the woods?/Are we in the clear yet?” sung from Swift. What magnifies this track to such a great magnitude is the blend of vocals with Swift and her backup vocalists in the hook: combining as one to create a chilling atmosphere that sends chills literally down your spine as the hook is chanted each time. The production and songwriting overall in this album come down as Swift's biggest accomplishment here: with the help of veterans such as Ryan Tedder, Shellshock, fun./Bleachers' Jack Antonoff, and the one and only Max Martin of Backstreet Boys' fame collaborating to create enjoyable pop music, while also staying true and personal to Taylor herself. This LP doesn't have even have a single song that should be avoided, not even the deluxe bonus tracks, which is obviously rare especially on the pop side of things. It's definitely hard to find one specific track that you can say is easily the best in the album because all of them are so good.

It will be a very long time before the music industry sees a pop album that is so polished and well-done the way Taylor Swift did it with 1989. Her fifth LP was superb, with an exquisite conjuring of both vocal talent and production that displays pop music being blown to its highest degree of both capability and appeal. The 16-track pop studio album is a showcase of Swift's best material to date, one that's certainly gonna see plenty of songs off this record garnering massive radio airplay. It's near perfect. In the deluxe edition, Swift includes three “voice memos” of her explaining to the listener about her songwriting process with three of the songs in the record in an acoustic, almost “unplugged”-like scenario. It makes it feel very personal to the listener, as if Taylor herself is talking to you about her song and singing it to you. It creates an connection between you and Taylor, while not literally but you get the point. It's also very educational as well for those who are unfamiliar with how artists such as Swift create their music with the assistance of big-shot producers such as Max Martin in the studio. 1989 is able to accomplish what most pop albums fail to achieve: distinction, maturity, and overall appeal. Even if you aren't too fond of pop music or even Taylor herself, you're gonna end up enjoying this because it's able to appeal to you. Swift's fifth LP is definitely the best pop album to be released this year, and undoubtedly the best mainstream release by an artist this year. It is definitely all worth that hype that helped build the excitement for it, a factor that is very difficult to accomplish especially as a mainstream artist, and its reaping the massive rewards because of that.



Recent reviews by this author
Logic Bobby Tarantino IIIDMX Exodus
Nas King’s DiseaseLogic No Pressure
Pop Smoke Shoot for the Stars, Aim for the MoonRaleigh Ritchie Andy
user ratings (1143)
3.4
great
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
SPRFanOf5H
November 4th 2014


874 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

This definitely goes down my list of best albums to come out this year overall, and undoubtedly the best pop album for sure. I wasn't expecting this at all, I've never really have been into Taylor Swift and I honestly had low expectations for her new LP when it all got announced and everything. I'm pretty impressed after listening to 1989, and I now have a new-found respect for Taylor which I really never had prior to this.



I'd definitely appreciate the feedback as always everyone, it's very helpful to me so my reviews are more polished and well-argued.

Jots
Emeritus
November 4th 2014


7562 Comments


first paragraph could be better I think. I think listing off a bunch of vague adjectives isn't the strongest way to introduce an album. I'd rather just see you show me those things in your descriptions.

also, a lot of your sentences could be condensed. a good tip is to CTRL+F words like "that", "which", "could", "be" etc and ask if they need to be there, and see if you can rearrange things to say essentially the same thing, but with fewer filler words in between. this is kinda nitpicky, but it's something to consider as you work on your writing

your next paragraph hinges largely on the "not a typical pop album" argument a bit too much I think. I can't even count the number of positive reviews of pop album's I've seen making this argument. go into a bit of detail and sell me on it, rather than saying it repeatedly, or namedropping artists like Demi Lovato or Selene Gomez. tell me what's so good about this, rather than what's shitty about them

"it will be a very long time before the music industry sees a pop album that is so polished"
- I guess I just straight up disagree with this.

- you say "pop" a lot. you don't need to, like, every sentence. we've ascertained it's a pop album. same with the term "mainstream".

there's a couple other nitpicks but w/e. hopefully this is remotely helpful.
tl; dr:
1 - watch your repetition
2 - be a bit more concise
3 - don't feel the need to constantly compare an album to other ?inferior? albums. focus on what's so good about this one.
4 - be more convincing aside from saying "this album is so good it's the best pop album this year".

trackbytrackreviews
November 4th 2014


3469 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Speak Now is better



Also dem walls of text

Jots
Emeritus
November 4th 2014


7562 Comments


walls of text? these are pretty reasonable paragraph lengths. are you referring to run on sentences?

trackbytrackreviews
November 4th 2014


3469 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

It's not so much as the length of the paragraphs as the fact that a lot of said paragraphs can be cut since it's just repetition

Jots
Emeritus
November 4th 2014


7562 Comments


ah. agreed.

ScuroFantasma
Emeritus
November 5th 2014


11971 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Good review Peter, have a pos. I'd consider rewording the summary and the first paragraph (and the stuff Johnny mentioned) but otherwise it's a solid review.

SPRFanOf5H
November 6th 2014


874 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

@JohnnyOnTheSpot: Yeah I've been definitely struggling with opening paragraphs lately on my reviews. I've been getting feedback on avoiding what I previously was doing, which was essentially a "quick history lesson" to everyone on the artist. I've been trying to do different ways of starting out a review to make it more interesting, but that's been easily one of my biggest issues regarding my writing on music.

Jots
Emeritus
November 7th 2014


7562 Comments


yeah a lot of reviews start off with a 'quick history' lesson - nothing wrong with that, as long as it's interesting. IMO the best way to go is to have an eye catching opener, and a satisfying conclusion (the first and last things people read in your review). doesn't hurt to get a little creative here. I guess use some staff reviews as reference, specifically Alex Roberston



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy