Dream Theater
Falling into Infinity


2.5
average

Review

by Xenorazr USER (120 Reviews)
July 23rd, 2014 | 77 replies


Release Date: 1997 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Burning Dream Theater's soul.

We hear enough about studios and record labels to infer that they're generally annoying. In Dream Theater's case (circa 1997), it's particularly baffling. Failing to so much as mimic Images and Words' radio success was apparently all that mattered when Awake came out. And as we all know, metal songs are guaranteed radio hits (cue sarcasm). So the pressure was, once again, on. Only this time Dream Theater's record label wanted something specifically meant to pollute American radio stations. Apparently they failed to notice that said band released a 23-minute epic two years prior.

The end result of Dream Theater being shoved in and confined was Falling Into Infinity, an album that's been bestowed with as much praise as James LaBrie's vocals. The comparison isn't arbitrary, either, as Falling Into Infinity was the first LP LaBrie did after his food poisoning incident. A lead singer with ruptured vocal chords, record label pressuring accessibility from a progressive metal band…you do the math.

Though the Dream Theater fan(boy) in me would give Falling Into Infinity a pass, given its background, listeners will ultimately take the album as is. And as it stands, Falling Into Infinity is a drab assortment. What's interesting is that while the album is the opposite of beguiling, you can hear a true Dream Theater album struggling to get out. Power ballads like "Hollow Years" and "Take Away My Pain" might not necessarily scream "put me on Train of Thought," but just from opener "New Millennium" you can tell the band were held back. And it's not like control inherently prevents Dream Theater from providing quality music--Awake was proof that they can benefit from it, but here the restraint is overbearing. The best example(s) of this come from Falling Into Infinity's two epics. 90% of the time Dream Theater epics are the ultimate form of audible comfort food; "Lines in the Sand" and "Trial of Tears" are in the other 10%. Calling either of these tracks "bad" would be an overstatement, but both are guilty of being utterly forgettable. Save Doug Pinnick's backing vocals on "Lines in the Sand," each is listenable, but unlike Dream Theater's other epics, neither will stick with you.

This kind of predicament is what comes to plague and, ultimately, define Falling Into Infinity. Whenever there's a moment or entire song that seems like it might normally work, something gets in the way. Oftentimes the shoddy production and ill direction are to blame. Remember how When Dream and Day Unite suffered due to lackluster production (among other things)? Similar situation here. Except where the band's debut was true to itself, within its confines, Falling Into Infinity buckles under the conflict of the band's aspirations and their record label's impositions. The result is a musical mess that doesn't sound half as interesting as it should.



Recent reviews by this author
Dream Theater Distance Over TimeAvantasia Moonglow
Swallow the Sun When a Shadow Is Forced into the LightSeventh Wonder Tiara
Shylmagoghnar TransienceAmorphis Queen of Time
user ratings (1537)
3.2
good
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
Xenorazr
July 23rd 2014


1466 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

As a Dream Theater fan(boy), this is a 3. As an objective listener, it's closer to a 2. Therefore, 2.5.

Artuma
July 23rd 2014


32769 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

dude it should be all about your own opinion, it's not really good to review it like "i like this, but people generally don't, so i'll rate it low and tell why people dislike it"



but other than that aspect this is pretty well written

Xenorazr
July 23rd 2014


1466 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

Let me elaborate, when I say "as an objective listener," I mean looking at it as if I wasn't biased towards the band to begin with. It doesn't necessarily mean I'm letting other opinions intrude on me, it just means I try to set my scale from "fan generosity" to "neutral listener."

Artuma
July 23rd 2014


32769 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

yea agreed it comes off just ridiculous if you make yourself look like a fanboy

BigPleb
July 23rd 2014


65784 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Album rules.

TalonsOfFire
Emeritus
July 23rd 2014


20969 Comments

Album Rating: 3.3

It has its moments

Artuma
July 23rd 2014


32769 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

well ya

beefshoes
July 23rd 2014


8443 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Hell's Kitchen/Lines in the Sand is one of their best moments imo.

EDIT: I pos'd, but fix the typo in the second to last section: "but both are guilty of being [utter forgettability].". Also, who cares if

you're a fanboy? As long as you write a decent review with

claims and reasons that justify your score, it doesn't matter. I don't agree with your reasons at all though. The production on

this is very good.

Xenorazr
July 23rd 2014


1466 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

I guess I'm blind, which typo is that?

tempest--
July 23rd 2014


20634 Comments


should be "utterly forgettable."

I really like this album, despite having some shitty tracks. Hell's Kitchen is absolutely gorgeous.

dante1991
July 23rd 2014


764 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

""Lines in the Sand" and "Trial of Tears"...both are guilty of being utter forgettability""



I gotta completely disagree with this, I'd say they're both top tier DT songs with a lot of soul. If the other songs were as solid as these, this would be one of the best DT albums.



Also, you should either get rid of "being" or change "forgettability" to "forgettable"

beefshoes
July 23rd 2014


8443 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I quoted it. It's in the third paragraph. I guess it's not a typo, but it's very awkward.

EDIT: Others beat me to it ;)

Artuma
July 23rd 2014


32769 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

hells kitchen is OK

mike197
July 23rd 2014


190 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Trial of Tears is a song I really like. The guitar solo in it is one of my favorites. But as a whole this album is a mess. I still like it more than Train of Thought, which is imo a better album objectively. The same way this one tries/fails to have radio friendly songs, ToT tries/fails to be real heavy, but is definitely more consistent musically.

mike197
July 23rd 2014


190 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Hells Kitchen is amazing

Xenorazr
July 23rd 2014


1466 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

Whoops! Was looking in the last paragraph, no wonder I was confused. Fixed.



See, when I first heard the album, I couldn't get over the production, it sounded so thin and distorted. It doesn't bother me as much, but it still sounds out of whack. Hell's Kitchen is good but too short.



As for "Lines in the Sand" and "Trial of Tears," they're good enough while I listen to them. They're rather enjoyable, actually. But the problem is, when I finish listening to either one, I couldn't tell you what they sound like or what stands out.

Artuma
July 23rd 2014


32769 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

ugh tbh i hate how INconsistent tot really is

tempest--
July 23rd 2014


20634 Comments


Peruvian Skies is the clear winner on this though, at least for me.

mike197
July 23rd 2014


190 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

'the problem is, when I finish listening to either one, I couldn't tell you what they sound like or what stands out. '



I feel like this with maybe 70% of DT's stuff

beefshoes
July 23rd 2014


8443 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

It is a great track. Oddly enough, when I wasted years of my middle and early high school experience trying to get others into DT, Peruvian Skies was often the only track that anyone ever dug.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy