My Bloody Valentine
Loveless


5.0
classic

Review

by IronGiant USER (15 Reviews)
May 10th, 2014 | 48 replies


Release Date: 1991 | Tracklist

Review Summary: An album as viscous as pink maple syrup

Some people are remembered for one thing in particular¬–Gallagher smashed watermelons with a sledgehammer, Nixon had the Watergate scandal, Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin. Their lives or careers are summed up by a single event or phrase, as if filtered through a processor or scrubbed meticulously with a disinfectant that removes 99% of all their accomplishments, shortcomings, and identity, leaving the few pieces of his or her life deemed “worthy” by Time to remain peacefully intact.

Before 1991, My Bloody Valentine didn’t have a legacy. In the late 80s they were an underground band, playing sold out basements to crowds of rowdy teens who had nothing better to do on a Friday night then get loaded and catch some music that was as loud and rambunctious as they were. But as the decade of synthesizers and John Hughes came to a close and the 90s reared its head, the band’s newly found vitality and determination inspired them to do something different.

Loveless was created by nearly bankrupting the band’s record label, with the final product reaching a budget of nearly $360,000 U.S. dollars after all the studio tinkering was said and done. But the great thing about Loveless is that it sounds that massive.

From the first hits of the stale-sounding snare that segue into a riff that can best be described as a stampeding elephant on opener “Only Shallow”, this record sounds like it was hand-crafted and tinkered with for hours upon hours upon hours, like a fine Italian watch, its gears and cogs being examined at and played with until the numbers were evenly spaced and the hands ran as smooth as butter across the white sheik face.

You can only imagine the feeling that surged through the recording studio as the band sat down with producer and longtime roadie Guy Fixsen and listened to this album in its entirety the for the first time. The sense of accomplishment that ran through everyone's bodies, a feeling less monumental but arguably as strong as when Neil Armstrong took his first footsteps on the moon, peering out at the Earth and realizing that the long journey, despite being anxious, tedious, isolating, and novel, was all together worth it.

Sound was never used like that before, the way the feedback is distorted and altered and layered like an aural onion, one piece on top of the other¬–the drums sound distant, like they’re being pounded on from a mile away and the bass possesses a feeling of complete submersion.

Beneath those are the backbone of Loveless, the cathartic sea of guitar that crashes with an innate ferocity and the angelic vocals of Bilinda Butcher, who, like Jons* from Sigur Rós or Thom Yorke from Radiohead, opts to use her voice as a supplement.

And it is during the best moments of Loveless, like in the almost tribal-like percussion of closer “Soon” or the noise-pop of “When You Sleep”, that most pleasingly showcases Shields in sync with Butcher, the two creating an interesting dichotomy between ferociousness and beauty.

To the unwilling or conventional ear, most of these songs sound like pure noise. The hook from “Loomer” is lost among the angular and almost atonal riffing while “To Here Knows When”’s buzzsaw feedback and electronic flourishes bury Butcher’s voice so far underground that one might begin to question if those voices that he or she is hearing are nothing more than white noise that has been processed and pieced together to sound remotely human.

But isn’t there a certain beauty that reveals itself amidst chaos, a melody or rhythm that we create for ourselves when everything around us is collapsing that helps us get through the calamity? Loveless is the night light that helps us sleep alone in the dark; it is an album that gives us this cacophony as a blank canvas so that we may find our own clarity within it.

So perhaps like Gallagher or Eli Whitney, My Bloody Valentine will be remembered in 50 years for their one thing, the band who created that one album back all those years ago that was so different and personal and adored, but ultimately shelved to collect dust by Time itself.

Given what Loveless is, however, that just might be enough. That just might be O.K.



Recent reviews by this author
Slowdive SouvlakiKanye West Yeezus
Ought More Than Any Other DayDeath Grips The Money Store
The Fall of Troy DoppelgangerThe Beatles The Beatles
user ratings (4109)
4.5
superb
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
IronGiant
May 10th 2014


1752 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

One of my personal favorite albums, tried to make it just as much about the feeling this album provides as the music itself. As always, hope you enjoy, any feedback is welcome.

menawati
May 10th 2014


16715 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

garish pink

IronGiant
May 10th 2014


1752 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

nice way to describe it menawati, I like that

Snake.
May 10th 2014


25253 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

swimming in pink

Cygnatti
May 10th 2014


36026 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

the fuzzzzzzzzz

IronGiant
May 10th 2014


1752 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

hey if you neg, I don't mind but I'd love to hear what you didn't like or thought I could improve on

mandan
May 10th 2014


13777 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

Pos'd hard, awesome album.

IronGiant
May 10th 2014


1752 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

glad you liked the review man, and yeah this album kills

Gyromania
May 10th 2014


37021 Comments


weird review

IronGiant
May 10th 2014


1752 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

in a good way? I'm trying to differentiate it a bit from the other reviews of the same album

IronGiant
May 10th 2014


1752 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

alright I'll try to clean it up thanks six

IronGiant
May 10th 2014


1752 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

hope this flows better six

Gyromania
May 10th 2014


37021 Comments


let me explain my comment a little

i think the structure is a little messed. first 2 paragraphs should be one and at the end you make an odd pokemon comparison. your central thesis is reinforced more than it needs to be (you essentially spend the first four paragraphs conveying a simple point - granted the fourth paragraph is awesome). that said, a lot of it is interesting to read, it's just that, despite being interesting, it's superfluous. i like the conversational tone and confidence you display throughout, however.

ps: i didn't vote

Gyromania
May 10th 2014


37021 Comments


dammit, sixdegrees beat me to it

IronGiant
May 10th 2014


1752 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Gyro i cleaned it up a bit and I think it helps my flow and point. how is it now?

IronGiant
May 10th 2014


1752 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I agree with you guys upon rereading the first couple paragraphs... my connections were a bit superfluous and esoteric and the sense that only I seemed to understand what I was talking about.

IronGiant
May 10th 2014


1752 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

great advice six, thanks I'll do that

oltnabrick
May 10th 2014


40640 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

so perfect.

IronGiant
May 10th 2014


1752 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I think the metaphor displayed in the first paragraph provides a great juxtaposition between legacy and the "one hit

wonder" niche that MBV is so commonly put in by a majority of people which is one of my main points so I'm leaving that

in but I hope it reads better to you now.

IronGiant
May 10th 2014


1752 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

When i first submitted this review it was more of a first draft and now it feels more fleshed out so thanks Gyro and six for the help it really turned this review into something I am proud of.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy