Pink Floyd
More


1.5
very poor

Review

by necroscope86 USER (19 Reviews)
March 18th, 2013 | 30 replies


Release Date: 1969 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Arguably the lowest point in Floyd's discography.

The third album from progressive rock legends Pink Floyd was entitled "More" and released in 1969. This was the band's first real misstep. Whereas "A Saucerful Of Secrets" had hinted at a regression in the power of their music from their debut, "More" really did tip their progress in the bin. Technically this was not even a proper studio album from the band and was in fact the soundtrack to the movie of the same name. Whichever way one looks at it, More does not contain the elements that make Floyd so great.

This is the first Pink Floyd album that does not contain Syd Barrett and the vocals are handled by David Gilmour on here. It contains piano, bongos, vibraphone, various background noises and the usual bass, drums and guitar set-up and clocks in at just under forty five minutes. This release dips into and avant-garde approach in its instrumental songs and also has a lot of acoustic numbers. The main style of it is a psychedelic rock album with some progressive styling to the instrumental songs. In particular this comes to the fore front on the seven minute song "Quicksilver".

The instrumental work is dull which is a first for a Floyd album. There is very little about it to keep the listener interested aside from a couple of passages on "The Nile Song". This is arguably the most straight-forward rock song the band has done and sticks out as having more of a hard rock vein. "Ibiza bar" also taps into this more hard rock side of the band with some power chord riffing in places. "The Nile Song" clocks in at three and a half minutes and in this time manages to carve an identity for itself as the strongest song on a release full of uninteresting tunes. The guitars are loud and aggressive and the vocals from Gilmour are great despite some poor lyrics.

The rest of the album lacks any real flow and feels too disjointed to be considered one release. Instead this is more of a compilation of various songs that fit individual moments on the movie it is taken from that lacks any power when placed into one release. It drags on for far too long despite the average song length being in the three minute region. The guitar work sounds so unlike what the band had done on the previous two albums and also unlike what they would accomplish on later releases. The drumming has no sense of rhythm nor time to it and instead has no real power behind it and the lyrics have no emotion whatsoever.

"Cymbaline" is one song that sticks out as being among the worst the band has done to date. The organ solo at the end of it is completely out of place and has no purpose other than to show off and be flashy. The vocals are decent but do not suit the mood nor nature of the music the band was attempting to accomplish with this track. This is probably the best known track from "More" and does not deserve this role as it is light years behind the more hard rock-oriented tracks found on here. Instead it is just another example of how movie soundtracks are nearly impossible to nail with a real flow to them.

"More" has no place within Pink Floyd's catalogue of releases and instead is just a boring collection of tunes from a poor drugs movie. Stay away from this whether you are a fan or one of the few haters of the band.



Recent reviews by this author
Death Scream Bloody GoreDarkthrone Transilvanian Hunger
Nas IllmaticImmolation Close to a World Below
Megadeth EndgameDeath Symbolic
user ratings (585)
Chart.
3
good
other reviews of this album
Thomas Bambaataa Ghidrah Towers (3)
...


Comments:Add a Comment 
Azn.
March 18th 2013


5612 Comments


god your reviews have no flow, the writing is so choppy

JinThaMC
March 18th 2013


35 Comments


I agree nigga, dis has nothing good bout it dis review doesnt

jtswope
March 18th 2013


2216 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

not their best moment but not THAT bad. cirrus minor is fantastic.

DrGonzo1937
March 18th 2013


5725 Comments


skele lol

DrGonzo1937
March 18th 2013


5725 Comments


surprised he hasn't had a convo with himself yet, about his review

Ire
March 18th 2013


41788 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

not the lowest point in their discog. momentary lapse man

Topaz
March 18th 2013


324 Comments


no floyd is less than a 3

DrGonzo1937
March 18th 2013


5725 Comments


Fuck off skele. stop making accounts

dannyboy89
March 18th 2013


11975 Comments


I think Notrap is the one most suited to do this discog, since he's the expert on Pink Floyd on this site.

Kris.
March 18th 2013


12345 Comments


how many alts has skele posted with in this thread?

lets count!!

1

2

3!

three alts!!

pissbore
March 18th 2013


9935 Comments


cymbaline is incredible wtf do you even music

Azn.
March 18th 2013


5612 Comments


only 2 kris

you miscounted

dannyboy89
March 18th 2013


11975 Comments


IMO prog bands are the toughest to review, because it's hard to pin down which is the best album, and get the seal of approval of progheads like Jethro. Speaking of which, why hasn't he posted already?

oltnabrick
March 18th 2013


30909 Comments


no 3 he was right lol

Digging: Suicideyear - FACT mix 462

Azn.
March 18th 2013


5612 Comments


jtswope isn't an alt...

tarkus
March 18th 2013


5560 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

this review is too disjointed and etc to be existence

YoYoMancuso
March 18th 2013


11113 Comments


cymbaline is incredible wtf do you even music [2]

Kris.
March 18th 2013


12345 Comments


nowadays i assume anyone without an avatar and a post count under 500 is skele

that's how sad sputnik is in this day and age

Underflow
March 18th 2013


2565 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I'm familiar with most of Floyd's discography, but not this. May check it out.

DrFunkenstein47
March 18th 2013


16 Comments


This review reads as if you've listened to the album twice, and read through your review once.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy