Jean Sibelius
Symphony No. 1 in E minor, Op. 39


3.0
good

Review

by SirArthur6 USER (8 Reviews)
December 14th, 2012 | 7 replies


Release Date: 1898 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Jean Sibelius, renowned for producing beautiful symphonies with luxurious harmonies, colourful timbres and moving melodies, is a force to be reckoned with… but he had to start somewhere.

Sibelius waited 38 opuses before releasing his first symphony, a form which he would later be renowned for composing for. Before time of writing, Sibelius was more used to writing less ambitious forms of music that had managed to garner him moderate respect in the music community, and so this was his first time composing in the most respected and prestigious form of the western classical tradition – and whilst by no means a spectacular or ground-breaking achievement, is still a good symphony, showing early signs of the greatness he’d achieve in symphonies later on in his career.

The first movement starts with a timpani rolling quietly in the background, laying a foundation for one of the most unmemorable melodies of Sibelius’s career, seemingly attached to the beginning only to make up for time rather than adding any quality to the piece. After the rather minimalistic first minute and a half, tremolo strings decide it’s time to take over and lead the piece, making the opening seem all the more pointless and unnecessary. The movement goes on to contain some interesting call and response between parts of the orchestra, before using the orchestra as a whole unified body to crescendo into the piece’s climax – early signs of the orchestral genius Sibelius would soon become. After this climax, however, Sibelius decides to see if he can actualise another sparse build up and dramatic climax in 90 seconds, trivialising the main body of the piece and making it seem more like a string of unconnected ideas than a well-thought out, cohesive movement.

The second movement initially sees more relaxed tempos and dynamics, but eventually becomes a melodrama with the strings arguing against the brass over who can play the loudest. It feels much more like one long piece of music, with ideas growing and evolving around each other until they boil over with excitement and enthusiasm. This enthusiasm boils over into the third movement as well, and Sibelius decides to return to the string of ideas approach which results in a messy movement, drowned in bombast, that becomes quickly forgotten as the final movement gets going.

The final movement mirrors the first in the opening theme and having similar build, rounding the symphony in a way that makes the seemingly ill-thought-out opening movement appear more relevant to the symphony as a whole. Seeing the symphony at its fullest, the final movement presents thick textures, dramatic passages and a ‘big’ ending – everything that had become typical of symphony endings for several centuries.

This symphony doesn't offer anything new, unique, or special, but is in places well written and shows signs of the fantastic orchestral writer Sibelius could be – especially in the second movement. Because of this, I’d recommend it only to the Sibelius fanatic as there are plenty of better symphonies out of there, including ones from later on in Sibelius’s career.



Recent reviews by this author
Momoiro Clover Z 5th DimensionRichard Addinsell Warsaw Concerto
Samuel Barber Adagio for StringsJohann Sebastian Bach Harpsichord Concerto in D minor BWV 1052
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Piano Sonata No. 11 in A major, K. 331Dmitri Shostakovich String Quartet No. 8 in C Minor, Op. 110
user ratings (8)
Chart.
3.6
great

Comments:Add a Comment 
SirArthur6
December 14th 2012


178 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

As always, feedback on the review is muchly appreciated.

NightmareCinema16
December 14th 2012


2016 Comments


Good work with the review. I suggest that if you do a tbt review, you put as much detail as efficiently possible to make the review a little better, otherwise, it's good.

menawati
Contributing Reviewer
December 14th 2012


16057 Comments


nice review, posd, not heard much of his stuff

Digging: Lo-Pan - Colossus

SirArthur6
December 14th 2012


178 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Thanks, I'd probably agree that I could have put more detail into describing the music, but I found it difficult to describe at length without either getting too technical about its composition which might put off those who aren't music theorists or sounding repetitive or cliche with generic descriptions that could fit all symphonies.

I'm reasonably happy with the end result and I'll probably leave reviewing any other symphonies for a while.

mindleviticus
December 14th 2012


8292 Comments


jean sibelius :D

toxin.
December 15th 2012


12613 Comments


review was great, don't know much by him cept Finlandia

taylormemer
December 15th 2012


4917 Comments


Sibelius' music, though grandiose and very lush, has always sounded rather trite to my ears. I can usually never get through a whole piece of his without switching off.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy