Steely Dan
Gaucho


2.0
poor

Review

by TheCount USER (14 Reviews)
November 30th, 2012 | 100 replies


Release Date: 1980 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Music's uncanny valley

Gaucho is the moment Steely Dan flew over the edge. They hadn't been a band in the technical sense of the word for years, with the only two permanent members Walter Becker and Donald Fagen expecting perfection and achieving it by employing as many studio musicians and sound engineers as they could get their hands on. Gaucho features the largest cast of extra musicians, with at least 42 session musicians and 11 engineers used to create these 7 tracks. In spite of this, it is Steely Dan's least complex effort. Gone are the complex harmonies and structures that had become the norm by the time Aja arrived, and replacing it are simple, groove based songs. What results is a musical uncanny valley; the soul and mystery has been drained from their sound, leaving these simplified numbers feeling like nothing more than bones, the kind of bones you expect to accompany the weather channel.

What the album boils down to is the world's most expensive and least inspired backing band accompanying the world's least expressive singer. For all the studio talent present on the album, the band rarely seems to use it. The drummers play simple time throughout, and while there's nothing inherently wrong with that - after all, Meg White made her career playing downbeats on a three piece drum kit - there's something bizarre about the rhythm section lacing any sense of nuance that could not be provided by a drum machine. No fewer than seven percussionists appear on the record, but rarely does one hear anything more interesting than an eighth note pattern presented in the most forced, uninspired manner possible. The rest of the musicians play with a similar lack of soul or emotion. The solos are particularly unrewarding, a feature that had previously been one of the strongest aspects of their variety of studio talent. Even Aja, which had similar polish, churned with an internal fire that would occasionally bubble forth to the surface, or the kind of personal expression that made it interesting. Where the record favored polish over passion, there would always be a myriad of subtle nuances layered on top of one another, giving the album a controlled, but expressive feel. But with the complexity removed, all that remains is a simple, soulless performance. Even Fagen's vocals, cool and level, feel hollow and processed.

The songs spread themselves paper-thin. Most tracks exceed five minutes and push six or seven, which is about two or three minutes too long in the case of these simple, grooving numbers. There is not variation or emotion to keep the listener interested, and as the album crawls along, and to accentuate the problem, the songs are incredibly similar, so the songs often never have a chance to be appreciated before they sound dull, trite, and repetitive.

There are occasional moments where their effort pays off, and the intention shines through. Woven through the album are moments where the musicians provide layers of subtly, but these are often pounded out of sight by the insistent, driving, and dull rhythm section. The solo section of "Glamour Profession" has some interesting solo work, even though it goes on much too long, and sounds similar to the kind of melodic proficiency characteristic of the solos on their earlier LPs. Similarly, there are occasional horn shots, such as on the title track and album closer that immediately jump out for their surprising quality. Unfortunately, these only serve to remind the listener just how poorly executed the rest of the album is, and these moments are in most cases suppressed, as if Becker and Fagen wanted their audience to fight for any scrap of quality buried in the album, like these hidden moments of sublimity exist as a middle finger to those who hoped that the drugs had simply consumed any sense of taste or style the band once had.

Rather, it seems as if they finally grew too obsessed with perfection. Over the year that it took to create, they sanded off every flaw until there was nothing with mentioning left. It may be technically perfect, but its inhuman, uninteresting, and disappointing.



Recent reviews by this author
Pornosonic Unreleased 70's Porno MusicLost In The Trees Time Taunts Me
Ghinzu BlowBen Folds Five The Sound of the Life of the Mind
God Is an Astronaut Far from RefugeLed Zeppelin How the West Was Won
user ratings (249)
4
excellent
other reviews of this album
Brendan Schroer STAFF (4)
A bizarrely compelling death rattle....

Beware NO TWINKCORE here, real metal only goddamnit! (they/she) (5)
"It's perfection and grace. It's the smile on my face"...

Drbebop (3.5)
The end of a perfect day...

TheMoonchild (2)
Perfection can only get you so far when the music underneath it is so desperately lacking....



Comments:Add a Comment 
TheCount
November 30th 2012


36 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I really enjoyed Steely Dan up to this point; this was particularly disappointing.

ThunderNeutral21
November 30th 2012


3863 Comments


steely dan roolz never heard this though

TheCount
November 30th 2012


36 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Imagine a Steely Dan record without any of the things that made Steely Dan interesting. I had to go listen to a few of their other albums to make sure I was being fair, and it only made me hate it more.

Chortles
November 30th 2012


21494 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

this is certainly one of their weaker albums but even then, it's not bad



but your review is really well written so pos'd hard

TheCount
November 30th 2012


36 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Thanks. I think there are some objectively positive things about it, but it just doesn't work.

menawati
November 30th 2012


16715 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Yea this is very weak compared to katy, pretzel and aja.

Think your rating is a bit low but decent review.

ThunderNeutral21
November 30th 2012


3863 Comments


pretzel ruleeeees

menawati
November 30th 2012


16715 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

yea it's their best for me

ThunderNeutral21
November 30th 2012


3863 Comments


yea its a sexy album. better than aja imo

Chortles
November 30th 2012


21494 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

aja for me but i haven't jammed half of their stuff in a while

TheCount
November 30th 2012


36 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Countdown to Ecstasy will always have a special place in my heart as the first record I heard of theirs, but I think Aja is their most objectively good. It just seems like what they were trying to do here, but successful.

menawati
November 30th 2012


16715 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

dont care about 'objectively good' i listen to stuff because it's subjectively good to me ;]

Chortles
November 30th 2012


21494 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

aja is genius yeah

Atari
Staff Reviewer
November 30th 2012


27952 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

haven't heard this album but steely dan is so chill

TheCount
November 30th 2012


36 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4TjfMtC6Kw



Feast your ears... or prepare them. Or something.



In hindsight, this might not be as bad as I made it out to be, but I think that it's fair to call it their worst.

Atari
Staff Reviewer
November 30th 2012


27952 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

haha he's funny but there's nothing wrong with steely dan

Havey
November 30th 2012


12073 Comments


Yea this is very weak compared to katy, pretzel and aja.


countdown?????????????????????

TheCount
November 30th 2012


36 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Hey, it's my favorite.

MO
November 30th 2012


24016 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

yea this does get a bit dry, but it's still jams

CynicalComplex
June 30th 2013


120 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

The sound(s) of a formerly great songwriting team ripping apart at the seams. Good review.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy