Metallica
S&M


4.0
excellent

Review

by AleksiS USER (15 Reviews)
January 11th, 2012 | 14 replies | 2,745 views


Release Date: 1999 | Tracklist

Review Summary: An experiment gone right!

1 of 1 thought this review was well written

By the late 90's, a lot of people weren't happy with the state of Metallica. While they had gained a number of new fans with their 1991 self-titled release (better known as "The Black Album"), they had also lost a number of them, due to the music shifting to a more commercialized style of heavy metal. Things got even worse when the band cut their hair and released the disappointing "Load". While "Load" and it's follow-up "ReLoad" may not hold up as well as the band's first five albums, there are still a number of great tunes on those albums, and as any musician knows, it's important to experiment and try new things or else you'll get bored with what you're doing. So in that respect, I commend Metallica for taking a bold step with "Load" and "ReLoad". But, like I said, the albums still don't hold up as well as their previous albums.

1998 Metallica released the covers album "Garage Inc.". With it, Metallica continued to try new things as well as, in some respect, return to their roots. The band continued to experiment the following year, when they teamed up with composer Michael Kamen and the San Francisco Symphony to orchestrate (no pun intended) what would become "S&M". With it, Metallica combined orchestras with their own music. This wasn't something that hadn't been done before or hasn't been done since. Bands like Deep Purple and Kiss have all done albums that combine symphonic elements with rock music; some have worked, some have not. At certain points, "S&M" works, and I mean REALLY works. While at other points... not so much.

For me, the main point of doing an album that combines orchestras and rock music is to add to the pre-existing songs. But in a good way. The orchestral pieces should add to the songs so that they emphasize the emotion and feel of the song, or that they fill in gaps that the songs might contain. For the most past, "S&M" does exactly these things. But what the orchestral pieces shouldn't do is feel unnecessary, out of place, make the song sound crowded, feel that they add nothing or make the song sound too different from its original version. Unfortunately there is evidence of these factors too.

Songs like "Until It Sleeps", "The Call of Ktulu", "For Whom the Bell", "Wherever I May Roam", "The Thing That Should Not Be" (where James Hetfield really seems to be having fun) and "Of Wolf and Man" really benefit from the orchestral elements; adding tension, making the songs sound even more bombastic than they already are, filling in gaps and emphasizing the feel the songs are trying to convey. "For Whom the Bell Tolls", "Until It Sleeps" and "Of Wolf and Man" in particular seem to benefit greatly from the orchestra, and quite possibly surpass the original versions (at least "Of Wolf and Man"). Other songs, such as "Sad but True", also benefit from the orchestra, with the orchestral arrangements changing the feel of the song completely, but in a good way.

But of course there are moments when the added orchestras just don't work. Songs like "Fuel", "Master of Puppets", "Battery", and "Enter Sandman" don't benefit from the orchestra at all; they actually hurt the songs. They make the songs sound crowded, and make the orchestra sound unnecessary. On songs like "One", "Hero of the Day" and "Bleeding Me" the orchestra doesn't really hurt the songs, but they don't really add anything either. There are also two new songs; "Minus Human" and "No Leaf Clover". Both are quite good, "No Leaf Clover" in particular.

In the end, "S&M" was a fun experiment to see how classical music mixes with Metallica. And in my opinion, quite well. Definitely recommended!



Recent reviews by this author
HIM Screamworks: Love In Theory And PracticeHIM Venus Doom
HIM Dark LightHIM Love Metal
HIM Deep Shadows and Brilliant HighlightsHIM Razorblade Romance
user ratings (1367)
Chart.
3.9
excellent
other reviews of this album
1 of

Comments:Add a Comment 
guitarist8688
January 11th 2012



10 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

This album definitely has the best version of Nothing Else Matters. I'd definitely include it on a "songs that benefit from the orchestra" list, but, y'know, different strokes for different folks.

The orchestra was a bit buried in the mix on the self-titled, but here it makes the song sound 2x as powerful.



BigHans
January 11th 2012



26455 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

sometimes I really hate this, I have it a 4 cuz Metallica

KjSwantko
January 11th 2012



8724 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I'd maybe re-arrange the first paragraphs because it seems kind of strange how the review starts at 1999, then goes back to 1998.

Also, just for future reference try to do reviews for albums that need them still. Cheers though. Welcome to Sputnik bro and enjoy your stay!

edit> Nevermind you've got other reviews already, just haven't made many comments.

Poet
January 11th 2012



5910 Comments


YEAH!!!!!!!

Spec
January 11th 2012



26848 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

This was actually good.

Cipieron
January 11th 2012



3508 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

this was actually my first Metallica album, still love it

TheNotrap
January 11th 2012



7821 Comments


Not a fan of this one.

Acanthus
January 11th 2012



9514 Comments


Things got even worse when the band cut their hair and released the disappointing "Load".

Damn rockstars, shooting of loads wherever and whenever they please.

Albums damn good, favorite Metallica album if I had to rank them.

Digging: Ayria - Hearts for Bullets

AsoTamaki
January 11th 2012



2525 Comments


If the setlist choices were a bit more refined, this would be one of the greatest things ever recorded. I agree that some songs don't benefit from the orchestra, but man. It works more often than not. That "Outlaw Torn"! Simply amazing.

EyesWideShut
January 11th 2012



3029 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

this turned out well. the Load songs really get a kick in the ass by that orchestra.

Tyrannic
January 11th 2012



3229 Comments


"At certain points, "S&M" works, and I mean REALLY works. While at other points... not so much."

this is a lot like the review, actually. some points you're solid, then you'll drop a pun or unnecessarily capslock really, but then go back to the solid writing. bits of this are great but bits like this, "For me, the main point of doing an album that combines orchestras and rock music is to add to the pre-existing songs. But in a good way"

i know you elaborate, but starting off like that is just weak to me. i almost didn't wanna read the rest, you know?

Rastapunk
January 11th 2012



662 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I love Outlaw torn!

EyesWideShut
January 11th 2012



3029 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

and when my face becomes sincere... BEWARE-AH!!!

MajorStupidity
January 11th 2012



10 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

They're are actually quite few bands who use Orchestral elements to great effect in their music, but they are not nearly as well known as metallica. Love the song no leaf clover they wrote for this LP and its nice to hear some of the classic metallica songs reworked with the orchestra.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2013 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy