Snowblood
Snowblood


3.5
great

Review

by rasputin USER (196 Reviews)
November 23rd, 2011 | 6 replies | 1,638 views


Release Date: 2009 | Tracklist

Review Summary: the right ingredients.

2 of 2 thought this review was well written

When it comes to the point where a genre is becoming stagnant, the only possible solution is to diversify, right? While incorporating a variety of styles into the mould of another can be compositionally catastrophic, some small proportion of bands do get it right and end up with a record that just ‘works’. While Snowblood certainly is rough around the edges, the way they’ve made a sludge record that retains its destructive ‘old school’ sludge feel yet still appeals to the fans of the trendier, more accessible derivative styles of post-metal, is remarkably noteworthy. This is almost certainly due to the fact that Snowblood do not go down the path of mediocre ambiance with their music, and whatever ‘post-metal’ that is found on the record is constantly overshadowed by tidal wave riffs and pure hatred in sludge form.

Snowblood is the Scottish group’s third and final album – after its release, they disbanded, leaving the record as what they will be remembered by. Now I’ve not had the opportunity to explore their first two albums, but I will make the claim that they certainly finished on a high note. While the record has some passages that consistently irk me, the amalgamation of sludge metal with various post-rock/metal influences, as well as the flirtation with European styled emotional hardcore, is done remarkably well, and keeps the album constantly interesting and affecting.

If and when the praises of post-metal bands like Pelican, Rosetta or Isis are spouted to me, my general reaction is to say ‘get the fuck out, where’s Neurosis?’, but I can certainly learn to be civil when the best from those bands is taken aboard by an invariably less monotonous style of music. Snowblood certainly take a great deal of influence from the climactic rise and build approach taken by these ‘post-whatever’ bands, blending them within their own sound. The album’s second track only really makes use of two very similar progressions, but the way it culminates from a soft and steady standstill to a cascading downpour of poignant riffage is exemplary.

When I first listened to the record I was immediately put off by its beginning – the opening minutes are made up of a nauseating mixture of Neurosis and Killswitch Engage, and so I was incredibly dubious about the album after reading that it was a ‘sludge’ band on the promotional material. After five minutes however, the song exploded into what Snowblood really sounded like. The way this moment is mixed simply must be mentioned – the slight difference in volume makes the transition so much heavier. So what did it sound like? Some of the best sludge I’ve heard, that’s what. Imagine a heavier Graves at Sea but with Thou’s unrepentant fury and perhaps a sprinkling of Dystopia’s sneering rage, and you have Snowblood at their heaviest. The first track is almost twenty minutes long and is perhaps the ‘colossus’ of the record – a good way to begin after fooling us with the mediocre intro.

What makes Snowblood such a good record is that even if it’s a section of simple composition, the music is always emotive to the utmost degree, regardless of the emotion (anger, melancholy, frustration) that is being conveyed. The record’s third track plays out very much like a Yndi Halda inspired post-rock song but gradually builds its way into something I would expect from the European hardcore scene, sounding very much like the bands Aussitôt Mort, Mesa Verde or Sed Non Satiata. While these bands may not mean anything to your average metal listener, it’s a commendation to the band to have been able successfully incorporate such a distinct style into a sludge metal record. If you were thinking that there couldn’t possibly be any more variety on this record than I apologize, you’ll have to bear with me just a little longer. The fourth song begins with something that sounds a lot like Tool and a little like Neurosis on The Eye of Every Storm, but Snowblood do not waste too much time with this and throw the listener back into their sonic devastation. I guess after two songs of melody and melancholy, they were aching to get stomping once again.

Ultimately, it’s very unfortunate that this is Snowblood’s last record. It encapsulates this modern sense of diversity within music, and melds together various ‘modern’ sub-genres as well as both accessible and inaccessible styles of music to create a varied and absorbing album. I of course have my own issues with the album – it’s certainly not perfect. The clean singing, while fitting nicely in the last track, sounds terrible on the first 5 minutes of the album, but rest assured that everything else is strikingly good. Perhaps the band purposely made the beginning of the record shitty, to deter posers and make the rest of it sound monumental in comparison. Regardless, Snowblood is an outstanding record, and while it would certainly be appealing to the new wave of doom listeners, I’m sure veterans of the genre will not find the album amiss either.



Recent reviews by this author
Hoax HoaxHakaristi Hakaristi
Burial Invocation Rituals of the GrotesqueEibon Entering Darkness
Abe Sada / Sub Ordnance Redux / Organ GrinderIron Lung/Mind Eraser/HS/Scapegoat Brutal Supremacy
user ratings (0)

Comments:Add a Comment 
rasputin
November 23rd 2011



14516 Comments


review might read a little stronger than a 3.5, but I honest haven't listened to this since I wrote this review, which was well over a year ago

might have to spin the CD and see how it holds up now

rasputin
November 23rd 2011



14516 Comments


go away

rasputin
November 23rd 2011



14516 Comments


yeah I reckon a lot of people on here would dig it

YetAnotherBrick
November 24th 2011



4385 Comments


"...some small proportion of bands do get it right and end up with a record that just ‘works’. "

I see this all the time, and I usually ignore it, but it's the point now where I think I should just make it known. When you're putting a word in quotes like that, you put the punctuation BEFORE the second quote. So it'd be

'words.'

not

'words'.

Sorry if I sound like a douche, just trying to be...constructive, I guess. As far as the actual review goes though, it's awesome, as always.
And this album sounds pretty cool, too.

rasputin
November 24th 2011



14516 Comments


actually, no it's not all the time

yes for quotation marks, but that was not a quotation

KILL
November 24th 2011



70573 Comments


is it hevy

Digging: Gal Costa - Gal Costa



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2013 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy