Tyler, the Creator
Goblin


3.0
good

Review

by Urinetrouble USER (73 Reviews)
May 6th, 2011 | 53 replies


Release Date: 2011 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Goblin is enjoyable on some parts but for the most part it's dull, uninspired, and it's just Tyler going through the motions

Odd Future are hyped a lot. Everybody who’s anybody knows who they are, despite whether they listen to them or not. Still, there is a wealth of talent among the crew members. Domo Genesis is a modern day weed rapper who’s not sloppy as ***, Hodgy raps among the best of L.A.’s blog rap scene, Mike G is a great lyricist, and Tyler and Earl are just, Tyler and Earl. The producers are also great too. However, Tyler’s recent fame has ultimately become his downfall. There’s not as much hunger to the music anymore, and it all seems like it was made to appeal to the fans rather than to themselves. By them, I mostly mean Tyler. As much as Tyler wants to sell out in a good way, Goblin is a bit of a sell out in the bad way.

I mean, yeah Tyler’s still an interesting lyricist and his beats are grimy as ***, but there’s a huge lack of hunger. Tyler doesn’t sound angry because he’s angry, he sounds angry because it appeals to people. In essence, it’s like he’s become the reincarnation of Eminem. It’s not exactly a bad thing, but it’s not the best thing either. His sell out attempts really show during the tracks. “Radicals” is pretty much seven straight minutes of hyping Odd Future, “Bitch Suck” is pretty much something for Jasper to shout nothing over for quite an amount of time. Oh yeah, and Goblin is too freaking long. 74 minutes of slow, pulsating rap that starts to drone in your head.

Yeah, so quite a bit of this sucks, but it has its high points as well. “Tron Cat” slams hard with dirty synths and snappy drums, “Yonkers” has Tyler rapping at his best over the sound of a stuttering engine, and “Sandwitches” has some of the fiercest rapping on the whole album. The only problem is its slow, minimalist beat that doesn’t match the track at all. Tyler still raps well, his beats only keep improving and he’s still awesome overall. Goblin just feels lazy though. Oh and the OF crew spots are pretty good, ranging from Hodgy’s excellent rapping to Frank Ocean’s beautiful, inspired singing.

Basically, this is Tyler going through the motions. He still has a lot of slow songs, He still experiments with the same styles, and he still borrows a lot from Eminem and The Neptunes. Basically, everything is still the same. Overall, I enjoyed Goblin, just not as much as I wanted to.



Recent reviews by this author
Heems Eat Pray ThugOpeth Pale Communion
Body Count ManslaughterThe Black Keys Turn Blue
Bosnian Rainbows Bosnian RainbowsTyler Brown The Hollows
user ratings (1826)
3.1
good
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
Urinetrouble
May 6th 2011


5771 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

the correct rating for this album

Tyrael
May 6th 2011


21108 Comments


I'm not trying to be an ass here but this review seems a bit rushed...
Also, stuff like this makes your review seem quite unprofessional (conversational even):

Yeah, so quite a bit of this sucks

I mean, yeah Tyler’s still an interesting lyricist

I'm not going to neg but I think you can do better than this...

Urinetrouble
May 6th 2011


5771 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

dude, its just a quick review. im not gonna take two fucking weeks outta my life to write some detailed ass review. i feel it gives the review a personal style though, unlike the soulless, pitchfork esque reviews i see here

SeaAnemone
May 6th 2011


21429 Comments


it's a fantastic singles album, but I don't think it's much more. So far I like it more than Bastard though.

liledman
May 6th 2011


3828 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

agree completely, and im surprised this is the first time ive really seen the neptunes comparison - pretty obvious.



it's a fantastic singles album




yonkers is really great but the album doesnt live up to it yeah awesome.

liledman
May 6th 2011


3828 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

and yeah the review does seem a bit rushed/informal

SeaAnemone
May 6th 2011


21429 Comments


is this supposed to be self-parodical or something?

illmitch
May 6th 2011


5511 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

pitchfork esque reviews i see here




pitchfork has much higher quality, more well-written and more intelligent reviews than almost every

review here dude

gaslightanthem
May 6th 2011


5208 Comments


123 mitch

Tyrael
May 6th 2011


21108 Comments


pitchfork has much higher quality, more well-written and more intelligent reviews than almost every review here dude

What? Most of our staffers/contributors write better than fucking pitchfork.

alachlahol
May 6th 2011


7593 Comments


HAHAHAHAHAHA MOR INTELLIJENT

alachlahol
May 6th 2011


7593 Comments


tyraelyx youve never ever read a pitchfork review

SeaAnemone
May 6th 2011


21429 Comments


lol yeah as much as I enjoy reading the contrib/staff reviews here and respect the musical opinions by them more than p4k's it'd be a bit of a reach to say they/we write better

Maniac!
May 6th 2011


28545 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

everyone knows RYM has the best reviewers

Slum
May 6th 2011


2580 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Handful of brilliant songs, but the rest of them are pretty forgettable. Review is alright

Urinetrouble
May 6th 2011


5771 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

maybe instead of criticizing the review, you could offer constructive criticism



there's a concept

Slum
May 6th 2011


2580 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

well you dismissed it as just a "quick review" so what's the point of critiquing it?

Tyrael
May 6th 2011


21108 Comments


tyraelyx youve never ever read a pitchfork review

Of course I do, it's the only site with reviews that I actually bother to read except for sputnik. What I was saying was that I enjoy reading the average contributor/staff review more because sputnik has more diverging user base so we get a lot of different points of view from people that don't write because they have to. As such they establish a better connection with the audience without sounding too unprofessional. Just my opinion.

captaincrunch11
May 6th 2011


1544 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Needs more Earl Sweatshirt.

DonniSharK
May 6th 2011


466 Comments


Album should've been at least 20 minutes shorter. At least. Also, the digital instruments sound... awful. Far, far worse than on Bastard.
I do like it, but NOTHING on this album reaches the extremely high quality of Yonkers. The songs range from boring to good, with a couple of great tracks and one extremely strong track thrown in. 3.0 for now.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy