Limp Bizkit
Chocolate Starfish and the Hot Dog Flavored Water


2.5
average

Review

by rebreh USER (3 Reviews)
February 22nd, 2010 | 34 replies


Release Date: 2000 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Limp Bizkits follow up to Significant Other features more of the same,angry dumb rapping, laden guitar, hip hop beat(z)and a desire to probe the world wrong.

Aparantley a lot is still bugging Fred Durst in 2001. This is just a
man who loves coming off as misanthropic, a guy that just can't give
himself a break. On Significant Other, Durst gave the finger the
media who just couldn't understand the "art" being created. Of course
reviews were generally high from such "esteemed" critics like Robert
Christaugh and Rolling Stone. He had problems with his 'significant
other only only to be rumored to have tapped some pop star(s). Hell,
he's even the vp of interscope records. Probally his biggest issue
comes from his musical peers he seem to sneer at his music and
disposition as for ***. But come on, should he hold these opinions
with any wieght. Coming from such artists as Nine Inch Nails(self
proclaimed genius), Zach Wylde (randy rhodes wannabee), Eminem
(obnoxious one liner),creed(were not pearl jam) and Slipknot(shock for
kidz). So really, I wish Durst would just give himself some
credit(and just try to forget about woodstock 99)and smile.

So what do the boys conjur up for the new millenium, an album full
of vulgaraties and lame inneundo. With a title like Chocalate
Starfish and the Hot Dog Flavored Water(for what its worth more clever
then may appear after all no one seems to agrea as to what it pertains
to) you basically sum up perhaps what your whole album will be.
Opening with Hot Dog, Boreland who appears to be out of ideas brings
us a Nookie-ish riff with an angrier Durst yelling "Bring it on".
From their on Durst tries to see just how many ***s he can cram into
a four minute song (about 46). In the chorus potshots are tooken out
against Nine Inch Nails which just sounds dumb. For the critics
challenging Durst's integrity this track doesn't do him any favors.
And besides its not even that original in the Nu Metal Genre, Kid
Rock's *** Off and Icp's *** The world beat them to the punch. The
former having with and the latter doubling the amount of ***s.

Durst loves the underdog image, despite having sold millions, its
an image he likes to conjur as much as he can. On My Generation,
Durst preaches to kids half his age(over neo-counterfit riffage) with
non sequisiters that are supposed to sum up the late/early 90's/00's.
"so go ahead and talk ***...about my generation...cuz we don't give a
*** till you give a *** about us" not exactley a "times are
changing" but thats what you get for electing Durst in this role. To
the same affect on Full Nelson which attacks the people always dissing
him, and basically sumarazing that they will get "knocked the ***
out". In the bridge he looks to his audiance and tries to turn them
against his enemies(which he hopes will come off as the establishment
but instead is just lame nobody's)"we got the fire to burn this
mother***er down". Of course this is a dictatorship, on My Way he
shows if you don't like it you can leave.

There are plenty of dumb moments on this album (what did you
expect with the title), and Rollin takes the crown. If you thought
Nookie was an overdrove Testosterone-frat boy anthem then you haven't
heard nothing. Rollin is a lame attempt at sounding hip with a bad
hookie pookie impersonation. An attempt to bridge the two sides of
his fan base, but at least with Nookie we could forgive him. Then to
make matters worse there is a remix of Rollin which does feature some
pretty astute guest spots (Method Man is back!!!) but the problem is when
collabrating with such talent you got to bring the chops, and Durst just doesn't
have the skill to match Red and Meth. Besides I like Durst a lot better when the
band is breaking *** and moshing the *** out of the areana.

To me this album is alot like the Use your illusion albums by
G'NR. Both were grand in scope(perhaps i give it too much credit) and
each were complete failures. Durst does a pretty good job at
summarizing his generation yet a terrible job at leading them
anywhere, after all this all about him really. Each album totally
missed the point of the songs the covered(sampled), Limp sample Life
in the fast lane, a song about consumer excess, and misconstrues it
into a party anthem. And both bands were lead by complete egotistical
jerks who were both against the world. Ultimatley Chocalate
Starfish...is merley just a band repeating itslelf, a band who has run
out of ideas. A band were vulgarities replaced songs and
loudness/softness suplants song structure. When your at the top of
the world its best not to bitch about it.


user ratings (2147)
2.7
average
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
AtavanHalen
February 23rd 2010


17919 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

This is structured really weirdly.

klap
Emeritus
February 23rd 2010


12409 Comments


spellcheck is your friend!

Eclectic
February 23rd 2010


3302 Comments


potshots are tooken out

Lol

bloozclooz
February 23rd 2010


1770 Comments


lol @ there already being about 6 reviews for this.

Phantom
February 23rd 2010


9010 Comments


Aparantley a lot is still bugging Fred Durst in 2001

bloc
February 23rd 2010


69990 Comments


This is a great album

americanmusicmachine
February 23rd 2010


3953 Comments


my dad threw this cd out of the window of a moving vehicle. it made me sad. luckily my mom stopped him from throwing my deerhoof cd out of a moving vehicle.

Eclectic
February 23rd 2010


3302 Comments


my dad threw this cd out of the window of a moving vehicle.

Rofl

Deviant.
Staff Reviewer
February 23rd 2010


32289 Comments


Reading this review gave me a giant headache, without trying to offend please tell me English is not your first language

rebreh
February 23rd 2010


12 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

The spelling is somewhat intentional mind you that this is a review for Limp Bizkit...the could have used a music check...And the structure is avante garde.

Deviant.
Staff Reviewer
February 23rd 2010


32289 Comments


And the structure is avante garde.


If so then this is the written equivalent of a Picasso picture

rebreh
February 23rd 2010


12 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I tried going for the James Joyce style of writing...oblique and no structure what so ever.

Eclectic
February 23rd 2010


3302 Comments


The spelling is somewhat intentional mind you that this is a review for Limp Bizkit

The hell? That's not bias at all...

Deviant.
Staff Reviewer
February 23rd 2010


32289 Comments


I tried going for the James Joyce style of writing...oblique and no structure what so ever.


Why? This is a music review, and a Limp Bizkit review to boot, James Joyce really has no place here. What are you, Principia's younger brother?

americanmusicmachine
February 23rd 2010


3953 Comments


James Joyce lol omg wtf... limp bizkit lulzwut?

Enotron
February 23rd 2010


7695 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

I enjoy this review.

Emim
February 23rd 2010


35244 Comments


Avante Garde, ha ha ha

So not only is it shit, but it's abstract shit.

rebreh
February 23rd 2010


12 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

How do you enjoy this review enotron...

Ok a few points

1. I know this has a lot of typos i didn't use spellcheck(did i have metion that) but this review was written in like five minutes on my free time during a lunch break.

2. The structure is a bit iffy but Im a fan of the Dean Of Rock's way of writing(i could never be as good but i can try) and you have to admit that this structure is a lot more interesting than the reviews that are like

Song 1-i enjoyed this

song 2-not so much

song 3-wow this is redundant

3. Have you ever read a James Joyce novel...they are quite good books..I was going to write in the style of Ayn Rand but I didn't feel like it.

rebreh
February 23rd 2010


12 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

But i enjoy criticism rather than praise...so considering this was my second review how can i improve?

Eclectic
February 23rd 2010


3302 Comments


this review was written in like five minutes on my free time during a lunch break.

That isn't a good idea, I believe it was Iluvatar who said that if a review takes you less then 15 minutes to write its not good.

Edit: Here's the quote: "Rule of thumb: If you finish a review in 10-15 minutes, you probably haven't done a great job."



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy