Linkin Park
Hybrid Theory


1.5
very poor

Review

by alecto USER (3 Reviews)
November 11th, 2009 | 96 replies


Release Date: 2000 | Tracklist

Review Summary: It's funny how times change. Back in 2001., this was the record of my life. 8 years later, things are a little bit different.

If you are over 18 you probably remember when Hybrid Theory hit the shelves. It came out of nowhere and sold faster than food supplies before Y2K. It broke all possible records and it seemed like everyone and their grandma were listening to it. The combination of hip-hop, fat drop-D guitar riffs, screaming and cheesy lyrics was an instant win for the angst driven teenage population pissed off by their parents, their awful life and by the fact that no one seems to know about them except for the bullies. I myself was one of the kids that got hooked by Linkin Park and I worshiped this album every day. Some 8 years later it's time for a bit more objective view on this record.

Nu metal was the fad at the turn of the millenium and Linkin Park was certainly the most prominent band in the scene. Their records sold in tens of millions, their concerts became bigger and bigger, and it all started with their first LP, Hybrid Theory. This record was so god damn big that it poses an inevitable question. What on earth made it such? What was the secret ingredient that sold it in more than 20 million copies, not even counting the ones that got burnt or the ones downloaded from the Internet? Well, for one thing, teenagers viewed it as a work they can relate to. It cleverly mixed easily accessible hip hop (devoid of biatches, pimps and swear words), a bunch of melodic hooks, angry yelling acting as an outlet for pain and frustration, heavy guitars for those who wanted to be so alternative or metal and a non complicated rythm section, all wrapped up in the silkiest production available. That combination worked like a swiss clock when it came to marketing and selling the product but it is just below average when it comes to quality. Hybrid Theory just isn't a record which is remembered by anything but the number of the MTV spins it received. It's simply a synonym for a cliched, trendy album with average songwriting at best, coupled with „true and emotive“ lyrics. The guitar riffs are bland and repetitive, the bass is almost non existing in the mix or mind numbingly simple, the vocals artificialy enhanced (if you ever heard Bennington live or on a live record you will notice that exactly because of that reason his performance is not even a shadow of the studio one) and hip hop and drum performance average at best.

The lyrics are a story for themselves. I would bet money that someone can write an algorithm which would describe how these lyrics were written. It's all about how this world sucks and how you lose time on waiting for it to be better, meanwhile being paranoid, left by yourself, forgotten by everyone, clinging one step closer to the end, wanting to run away from it all. And that's about it, they have an expiration date depending on the age of the listener.

The song structure is a game-set-match argument against every single critic who praised the albums inventivness. It roughly evolves around this concept: intro-verse-chorus-verse-chorus-bridge-chorus-outro. No song exceeds 4 minutes and they were all a potential single except Cure For The Itch which is an entirely computerized instrumental track (if you consider samplers and turntables as valid instruments). The closest to a quality song Linkin Park comes is in Pushing Me Away which lacks the generic rapping and actually has a good, natural harmonic driven, guitar line. All the other ones are not worth describing simply because I would be saying the same things over and over for every one of them.

To sum it all up- Hybrid Theory is an average record at it's best moments (and there aren't many of those). It is so now, and it was so when it came out, only we who fell for it didn't know any better. Today the people who have grown up in a musical sense realise fully the shallowness of such an album which was made to be sold in as many copies as possible. Frankly, it's hard not to realize it. However, I'm not giving it the worst grade simply because of the fact that the record is not actually repulsive. It's perfectly fit for shallow, periodical entertainment for those who want to take a rest from contemplating real music and according to that it serves at least some purpose.


user ratings (5935)
3.7
great
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
Asiatic667
November 11th 2009


4651 Comments


To be honest, I'm too tired and too bored of LP to read your review.
It seems like practically every new user reviews this album.

Meh, I'll read it tomorrow

LepreCon
November 11th 2009


5481 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

I still listen to a few songs off this every now and then, it was a good record back when I was 13 and angry at everything and everyone for no apparent reason. Still think its good though, one of the better nu metal albums IMO

Asiatic667
November 11th 2009


4651 Comments


Reanimation is kind of better, though.

Roach
November 11th 2009


2148 Comments


Band never released anything good.

Fugue
November 11th 2009


7371 Comments


Agreed with LeperCon pretty much.

Willie
Moderator
November 11th 2009


20212 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Writing a bad review of Linkin Park to prove that you've grown up and matured musically is a waste of everyone's time.

Abdiel
November 11th 2009


14 Comments


^Hah.

qwe3
November 11th 2009


21836 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

this really isnt that bad dude.

Asiatic667
November 11th 2009


4651 Comments


yeah. From what I remember of it, I would rate it at least 2.5, 3 if I was generous

Metalstyles
November 11th 2009


8576 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

childhood album, still okay for a few spins during the year and like Willie said, your review isn't really necessary at all.

qwe3
November 11th 2009


21836 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

3 for me

Asiatic667
November 11th 2009


4651 Comments


Something in here's not right today...

BigHans
November 11th 2009


30959 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Although I thought you wrote well, I highly disagree with you. While they aren't geniuses or anything, I will always love this album, and I was 20 when it came out.

TRMshadow
November 11th 2009


5119 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

yeah it's mainstream crap, but it doesn't deserve a 1.5

Relinquished
November 11th 2009


48719 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Reanimation is kind of better, though.


This.

klap
Emeritus
November 11th 2009


12409 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

reanimation is better



and there's nothing wrong verse-chorus-verse songs

IkarugaSoul
November 11th 2009


41 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Good review, I was similar in that this album hooked me back in the day. It has a nostalgic value, but it's mostly overriden with the "what was I thinking?" value.



And yeah, Reanimation is better due to its greater highs, but I also think it has lower lows than HT.

Emim
November 11th 2009


35253 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

(if you ever heard Bennington live or on a live record you will notice that exactly because of that reason his performance is not even a shadow of the studio one)




This makes me think that you haven't heard him live. He sings just as well, and screams even better than he does studio wise. This is definitely not a 1.

Apollo
November 11th 2009


10691 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

bad review, why bother?

Gyromania
November 11th 2009


37018 Comments


How typical.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy