Limp Bizkit
Three Dollar Bill Y'all


2.5
average

Review

by DirEnRefused USER (18 Reviews)
May 2nd, 2009 | 14 replies


Release Date: 1997 | Tracklist

Review Summary: An overly revisionised album which isn't horrible, it's just mediocre.

When Limp Bizkit came onto the scene in 1997, they rode on the recently unearthed market which was angsty teenagers, aiding in the growth and dissemination of what would become nu metal. In retrospect, all musicians with traces of credibility find both the genre and Limp Bizkit, as a whole, abhorrent in what I think is an overly revisionist opinion. This negative nostalgia has been only worsened by Limp Bizkit's later releases and the antics of their lead singer Fred Durst, now one of the most reviled men on the planet. So I'm setting all that aside and looking at this album for what it is, a decent rap metal release with some traces of creativity and energy. Not great, but not deserving of the complete discredit it is often regarded with today.

What makes this album decent in comparison to Limp Bizkit's other releases is the bands initial reluctance to enter into the world of ballads and Fred's "singing", of which the closest you'll get is "Sour", which apart from some interesting guitar work is a poor song, showing the band's limitations. The album mainly comprises of fast paced songs with rap and bass driven verses and built up screaming with guitar walls at chorus and breakdown. Whilst formulaic, the songs differentiate just enough to stop them blending together and the musicianship, whilst rarely anything past standard, isn't necessarily bad. Sam Rivers as bassist is consistent in his performance, never going out his way past the first string but inkeeping a grooving rhythm none the less. Wes Borland, whilst toted as an inventive guitarist, fails to display his prowess on this album, he can create an ambience and shred a riff but there's nothing in the way of innovation or technicality. An under appreciated member, John Otto, remains as such, as what is otherwise quality drumming is masked in a sometimes unclean mish mash of instruments in breakdowns and choruses.

Which brings us to Fred Durst and you know what, putting aside the fact the man is a complete idiot, I can tolerate him on this album. The rapping, whilst never overstepping itself, can keep the beat and it does what the album intends, it builds you up to the chorus and the boom of noise, a cue for Limp Bizkit's target audience to "get the **** up". This leads us to believe the band shouldn't ever have a song with near full focus on rapping or you get "Indigo Flow", one of the worst tracks on the album. Fred's screams have a decent raw emotion and his shift between vocal media's is a practiced one, we once again however never see Fred exploring much of a vocal range. The lyrics are rife with infamous hip hop phrases which people are right to scoff at and are rarely set into anything other then the stereotypical "I have problems and I'm angry about them" mind set, it's one dimensional but the flow of the song can usually make them tolerable, though make no mistake it's a weak point.

All of these restrictions may make the band sound one track oriented and I think that's a just description. Where the band go wrong is when they tried to branch out without the experience or skill to do so and we're led to albums like Results May Vary. Experiments into other areas are seen on the album but unfortunately, I'm not rewarding effort when the end product never ends well. "Everything" was an unimaginative following of the "do an ending track which is very long and barely a song" and is just a strange, spaced out and incoherent mash of sounds in an try too hard attempt at epic. "Intro" is equally pretentious with a poor attempt at some abstract meaningful message. However, Limp Bizkit does the aforementioned "one track" well and though they've similar musicianship and formula, "Pollution" "Counterfeit" "Stuck" and "Leech" are all decent songs. They're stereotypes in audio, they lack imagination but ultimately they do what they set out to do, encapsulate some energy and anger so some fifteen year old can punch a wall at the chorus.



Recent reviews by this author
Jamie T Panic PreventionTrophy Scars Darkness, Oh Hell
Deftones Koi No YokanGlassjaw El Mark
letlive. The Blackest BeautifulKanye West Yeezus
user ratings (1324)
3
good
other reviews of this album
SatelliteYears (4)
A raw, energetic performance by Limp Bizkit at their best. May not have the commercial appeal of SO ...

Unitcircle (4)
An unpolished, edgy look of one of the late 90s most polarizing bands....

Nytro (3.5)
It's.....actually.....not....bad!...

random (4.5)
Excellent and heavy album? Check!...



Comments:Add a Comment 
DirEnRefused
May 1st 2009


3665 Comments


It's my first review so I figure I'd cover a well documented album for some educated feedback.

Phantom
May 1st 2009


9010 Comments


LIMP BIZKIT SUX LOLOLOLOLOL


The guitar in Sour is pretty nice though.



This Message Edited On 05.01.09

KILL
May 1st 2009


81580 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Three Dolla Bill Y'all!!!!!!!

MiK
May 2nd 2009


240 Comments


I'm gonna tell you, like you told me, cash rules everything around me, see its a three dolla bill y'all!

Meatplow
May 2nd 2009


5523 Comments


It's my first review so I figure I'd cover a well documented album for some educated feedback.


Very good review, I find picking easy targets like this it's hard to go wrong with a negative angle but you offered praise for the group as well. You didn't meander too long on nitpicking song details, which is good.

Disregarding his personal life and whenever he would shoot his mouth off at other celebrities Fred Durst was a decent enough frontman, some of their tracks were a lot of fun. But a mediocre career for the most part.

Metalstyles
May 2nd 2009


8576 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

very nice first review dude, pos. Review is very impartial wich is always a good thing and you made good descrptions. Also the review's flow was nice and smooth so a great first effort.



I hate this album pretty much though. I find that the only songs worthwhile in here are "Pollution", "Leech" and "Faith". The rest blows pretty hard.

KYZAR
May 2nd 2009


513 Comments


not his 1st...

but im surprised there was no review for this

Athom
Emeritus
May 2nd 2009


17244 Comments


there are 2 more. the layout changed and now the other reviews are by the ratings

DirEnRefused
May 2nd 2009


3665 Comments


KYZAR, it's my first, why wouldn't it be?

KYZAR
May 3rd 2009


513 Comments


what? it said u had two

and NOW i see the other reviews, thanks
This Message Edited On 05.03.09

DirEnRefused
May 3rd 2009


3665 Comments


Yes, I've written two in two days, this was my first.

Wizard
May 3rd 2009


20510 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

'Counterfeit' will always rule off this album. Review was perfect. 'Sour' isn't that bad a song, is it?

DirEnRefused
May 3rd 2009


3665 Comments


Meh, Wes' tapping is good but I feel the slow pace of the song forces you to focus on the lyrics (never a good thing), Fred is doing that annoying whiney sing and the song just doesn't seem to go anywhere with the dreary breakdown, leaving it feeling shallow. If you like it then more power to you.

Wizard
May 3rd 2009


20510 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

tbh I haven't given this a listen in years. I will probably say the same thing as you after I give it another spin hahahaha. Like the way you back up your opinions with actual reasons instead of just hatin'.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy