Wolf Parade
At Mount Zoomer


2.0
poor

Review

by Rudy K. EMERITUS
January 21st, 2009 | 17 replies


Release Date: 2008 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Wolf Parade have once again defined a sound that is unequivocally theirs, but as a whole the songs tend to sound too similar too one another over the long haul to match up to Apologies’ breakneck pace and innovative rapid-fire changes.

Wolf Parade’s combustible, frantic first album, Apologies To The Queen Mary, was one of the most creative and undeniably fresh debuts by an indie rock band in 2005 or since, and their members’ haven’t been lacking for any new ideas; vocalists/guitarists Dan Boeckner and Spencer Krug have been involved in countless side projects, with Wolf Parade only the most well known. It would be quite a task to match up to the unique indie-rock of Apologies, and Wolf Parade doesn’t try. Instead, they set back the metronomes, tone down the yelps, and take to At Mount Zoomer like a wizened painter slowly fine-tuning his latest piece to work out every last kink.

The results are, predictably, mixed. Much of Apologies charm came from its “damn-the-torpedoes-full-speed-ahead” mentality and the way Wolf Parade’s grab-bag of rock styles and influences combined to create a whole that always seemed like it was about to fall apart but somehow managed to stay strong to the end. At Mount Zoomer is slower and more calculated; Wolf Parade knows what they want to do, and, for the most part, they do it. “Soldier’s Grin” is vintage Wolf Parade, rolling drums, hypnotic keyboards, and Boeckner and Krug’s peculiar vocals framing their characteristically dense lyrics.

“Call It A Ritual” is even more tightly focused, built around a foreboding piano line and squalling guitar, but the song never really develops beyond its origins. The following “Language City” is the best song on the record, a tune about the pointlessness of bull***ting that has a better beat than anything else on the album and a cathartic synth-based ending.

The songs tend to switch between shorter 3-minute pop experiments and 6-minute-plus musical expeditions. At Mount Zoomer thus has only nine tracks, but due to the often-bloated track lengths, Boeckner and Krug’s idea well tends to run dry along the second half of the album. “Fine Young Cannibals” loses steam early and turns into an instrumental that is interesting only the first time one listens to it. Closer “Kissing The Beehive” is about as prog as Wolf Parade could ever reasonably be expected to go, and consists of about five minutes worth of excellent melodies and ideas and another six minutes of so-so noodling and half-brained ventures. It’s a conscious attempt to sound epic, one that they can do just as easily with half the space.

Overall, the tracks on At Mount Zoomer tend to stand up individually on close inspection, but when the album is taken as a whole, its parts seem a little less distinctive. No song here grabs you immediately like Apologies opener “You Are A Runner And I Am My Father’s Son” or the heartfelt honesty and catchiness of “Dear Sons And Daughters of Holy Ghosts.” Apologies succeeded in never staying in the same place for too long; At Mount Zoomer succeeds in once again sounding unique, and Wolf Parade have once again defined a sound that is unequivocally theirs, but as a whole the songs tend to sound too similar too one another over the long haul to match up to Apologies’ breakneck pace and innovative rapid-fire changes.



Recent reviews by this author
Grimes Miss AnthropoceneThe Raconteurs Help Us Stranger
The National I Am Easy to FindJenny Lewis On The Line
Vansire Angel YouthGolden Features SECT
user ratings (187)
3.5
great
other reviews of this album
natey (3)
Spencer Krug, why have you forsaken me?...



Comments:Add a Comment 
AggravatedYeti
January 22nd 2009


7683 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Review is well written, and I see some of your points, but to dish out a 2 it seems you should be a bit more fuming towards this.

Its seem like your issue is it's too calculated and as an album it meshes too much, yes? Or that it's not as messy(enough) as 'Apologies...'. Now I agree, on all these points, but flesh this out a bit more, go into more detail. I don't see the 2 here, if anything this sounds like you popped it in, gave it a half-hearted spin and wrote up a "review" because this didn't vibe with you right away. Make me hate it.

natey
January 22nd 2009


4195 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Nice writing. I kinda agree with you but I'm struggling to get why exactly you gave it a 2. I wanted to give it a 2 because I was dissappointed but it really isn't a poor album imo



"Grey Estates" is the one hip track that has stuck with me

klap
Emeritus
January 22nd 2009


12409 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Alright, when I wrote this review it was sort of on short notice because I had a deadline; all-in-all I think the original rating I gave it was a 6/10, but after listening to it over the year this is an album that has never really appealed to me, hence the ending 2 rating. Should have probably cleaned up the review and added in some more points that became apparent to me after listening to it more.



But man, this was just a huge letdown for me after Apologies.

StreetlightRock
January 22nd 2009


4016 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

pretty much. They could have condensed this album into like 3 songs and that would have about covered the sounds they explore here.

cbmartinez
January 22nd 2009


2525 Comments


I didn't think this was that bad. Apologies is definitely better but they have a cleaner, tighter sound on this that I liked.

AggravatedYeti
January 22nd 2009


7683 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

^ agreed.

natey
January 23rd 2009


4195 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

[QUOTE=klap4music]

But man, this was just a huge letdown for me after Apologies.[/QUOTE]

Yeah I definitely agree. I was really psyched for this.

Sleutheren
June 18th 2009


25 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I can't understand why so many people dislike 'Kissing the Beehive'... I freaking love it.



"Fire in the hole!"





Also, I love this album. It may not be quote as amazing as Apologies, but it is still a must listen imo.

hurleyman420
October 6th 2009


21 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Well written review. I think the main reason AMZ isn't very good is because ATTQM was so damn amazing. It's just tough seeing them regress.

risbo
April 8th 2010


13 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

people compare this to ATTQM way to much. it's different but in its own right an amazing indie album.

IRAI
April 8th 2010


1567 Comments


i was just listening to 'Apologies...' when i ran into this.


should i bother with this? i REALLY like 'Apologies...'

risbo
April 9th 2010


13 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

If you're expecting the same album as Apologies then don't get it. It's not as fast paced in changes as ATTQM but the instrumental build ups can add so much to the climax of a song.



Whenever that's cited as a problem I think of shut up i am dreaming and completely disagree.

MrBobDobbelina
September 21st 2010


20 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

No it's not ATTQM but it is an excellent album in it's own right. Sometimes it takes a little time to get used to a new album by a band and this one is worth it.

juiceviaorange
July 1st 2013


1051 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I dig this album a lot. Not "Apologies" good but they were clearly aiming for a different goal with "Zoomer"

ExcentrifugalForz
February 13th 2014


2124 Comments


The first half of this album is all winners.

Back half is decent.

Sleutheren
July 29th 2018


25 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Kissing the Beehive is still killer.

GhandhiLion
January 25th 2020


17641 Comments


very cool album title



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy