Albert Hammond Jr
¿Cómo Te Llama?


2.0
poor

Review

by Robin Smith EMERITUS
July 2nd, 2008 | 16 replies | 84,902 views


Release Date: 2008 | Tracklist

Review Summary: At least Hammond will be ready to be reminded that he spelt the title wrong.

Come the summer and Albert Hammond Jr quite obviously has nothing much to shout about. Only the most pedantic of people have the pleasure of bashing the guitarist for his apparent newfound hobby – linguistic and grammatical failings. For whatever reason, ¿Cómo Te Llama? is both a nod and an abuse of the Spanish language, Hammond, seemingly asking us How does he/she/it call you? instead of the perhaps more conventional What is your name? Sadly, whatever intentions Hammond made to poke fun at language, he ends up poking fun at himself as fans, confused, stumble across his error. Arguments fuelled over whether what we have here is pseudo-wit that most would have grown out of in translation or simply an ignorant, unrehearsed misstep feel somewhat irrelevant, considering both embarrassments could actually summarise Hammond’s sophomore stab in the dark.

Most sad of all, had the Spanish theme continued for more than three words, maybe he could have done a better job of shaking the demons piled on him by his Strokes priorities. Nothing here can quite do this right – “Bargain Of a Century” could nearly catch the listener off-guard with alien piano tendencies, were it not for the typically governing guitar chords that matched it. The track almost finds the perfect balance needed; Hammond lying his way into his second effort with a track that feigns potential, only to be frustratingly countered with “In My Room” – very much the same track, only without the piano and well, more in the vein of a Room On Fire B-side than anything. When Hammond is tied down like this, the album feels hopelessly claustrophobic, and devoid of the little sentimental harmonies indicated on his at least distinguishable debut – whatever happened to opening an album with “Cartoon Music For Superheroes”?

Here, though, the man seems to have assembled a tribute-band who are at times terribly indignant to be that tribute-band. When they conform the more bearable and slightly justifiable side of “GfC” comes across, save the old guitar tricks. But if anyone seriously thought experimentation would relieve them, they obviously hadn’t realised how completely worthless that experimentation would prove. “Spooky Couch”, is an example of how to waste seven opportune minutes on a sluggish instrumental that squanders not only the time of the listener, but also its own potential to be the quirkier delight it screams for. Surely something closer to the jazzed-up trumpet outro of “Hard To Live (In The City)” of Yours To Keep would have proved better than the violins that half-heartedly stumble into action after six minutes of the same (completely unsurprisingly by this time) guitar notes over and over again, as if late for original duties and quickly improvising. Even at his most creative, Hammond shies away from the impulsions of freedom he should absolutely treat himself to.

More than just instrumentals need to be trimmed down or out here, however. “Feed Me Jack Or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Love Peter Sellers” is a ludicrously creative song title for a song that thanks to its initial hashed-up piano notes is ludicrously bad. “G Up” disappointingly feigns genuine energy, with speedy bass and guitar that succumb to lacklustre vocal work. This covers up dire lyrics I know/You might not come with me/But please let me speak of it/I’m not which are only worsened in quality by the sleazy howl, a hopeful attempt to withdraw these words swiftly. “Lisa” has the nerve to copy the two songs that preceded it while lyrically falling as flat as “G Up” did – You won’t change me/cause I never go/No I never know a hint as to why Hammond never bothered to rhyme properly before now.

“You Won’t Be Fooled By This” at least does two thankful jobs, which are make us remember how Albert Hammond Jr used to be when the echoes in his voice were fittingly coherent, and to supply an apt anecdote for his second bash. Unfortunately, the only job the album itself does is diminish thoughts swaying the way of a flowering solo career. It’s not so much that ¿Cómo Te Llama? always sounds so directly bred from the garage-revival band Hammond springs from, albeit more to do with the proof this far that he has no valuable assets when he attempts to diversify. Though with the biggest characteristic of all, the job the album title does is summarise that Hammond is either too lazy to think of something sneakier than a wrongly conjugated verb, or too happy to hide his songs behind what ¿Cómo Te Llama? falsely - and obscurely - offers. Still, while The Strokes keep quiet, there’s always time to sort it out.



Recent reviews by this author
Owen At Home With OwenTimes New Viking Dancer Equired
David Bowie The Next DayTim Hardin Tim Hardin 2
Blue Hawaii UntogetherGrizzly Bear Shields
user ratings (30)
Chart.
3.2
good

Comments:Add a Comment 
pianotuna
Emeritus
July 2nd 2008



4043 Comments


streaming at http://www.myspace.com/alberthammondjr

kind of disappointing how this doesn't grow over time at all.



HailToTheThief
July 2nd 2008



144 Comments


"Feed Me Jack Or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Love Peter Sellers"

wow that song title alone turns me away from this album.

pianotuna
Emeritus
July 2nd 2008



4043 Comments


that and the album title

Skyler
July 2nd 2008



1084 Comments


first album wasn't good enough to warrant a second

pianotuna
Emeritus
July 2nd 2008



4043 Comments


meh. it had some great tracks. he's never been that great alone though.

natey
July 13th 2008



4170 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

this was ok on first listen.

camote
September 8th 2008



1 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

The album name is stupid. The cover is lame. The title of the last song is absurd.

BUT... I do believe you guys are acting pitchforkisly here. Somebody goes and bash the album and everybody else supports seeking random reasons like the album name? I do hate it (title), specially since I'm latin my self, but before stating anything from the album I'll be listening to it.

This is a very nice record. No Pet Sounds, No Is this It? but certainly better than the average "3.0 and above" ratings you find here. I believe the review is very well written (the introduction is brilliant) but way to biased. A little fresh air and another chance might not harm.

Of course, if you hate it, you hate it.

Happens to me all the time with top 20 shit.






MaskAtTheMasquerade
May 20th 2009



2595 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I Don't see whats so bad? I couldn't care less about song names, and album covers, and even the title of an album (even though
in this case, it makes sense to me since Albert is part Spanish.) I mean it does affect me in some degree, but the main focus here
should be the music. Its not Albert's best work, but the album has really grown on me.This Message Edited On 05.20.09

justhere2
June 11th 2009



2 Comments


I truly feel this reviewer is wrong.

I think Albert has a great voice, the songs are simple and catchy, you won't be fooled by is actually the only song i thought was strokesy (contrary to reviewer) but only because it has that doo-woppy pop feel they touched on in room on fire. Feed me jack is simple and heartfelt and if you youtube the acoustic version it almost seems beatles like. Lisa is a great tune

I would love to know the reviewers favorite bands, i think it would explain, for anyone interested i love the smiths, joy division, the clash, the stones, velvet, reggae, pixies, oldies, good ol ny hip hop, and for new stuff yyy's. if the reviewer is still here, pleeease list your favorite bands so we know.

AtavanHalen
June 11th 2009



17927 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

GfC is such a good song.

justhere2
June 11th 2009



2 Comments


ok robin i looked up your bands.

guess you just not liking this record as you seem to have good taste.

oh well, your still prob a talentless, miserable person, well obviously you're a critic.

AtavanHalen
June 11th 2009



17927 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

What in god's name are you talking about? You can't be any older than fifteen, please leave forthwith.

pianotuna
Emeritus
June 12th 2009



4043 Comments


i was prob wrong anyway, i love bargain of a century though : (

telebyrd
January 7th 2011



869 Comments


Spooky Couch rules

Shotmaker
November 22nd 2012



19 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

This is a not as good his first album, but it's still great. Grows on you after a few listens. The reviewer is clearly on nitpicking mode. BTW, "In my Room" is a fantastic song.

pianotuna
Emeritus
November 25th 2012



4043 Comments


the reviewer was clearly about 15 and an idiot, yes



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2013 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy

IndieClick Music Network