Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
Piano Sonata No. 11 in A major, K. 331


2.0
poor

Review

by SirArthur6 USER (14 Reviews)
December 31st, 2012 | 37 replies


Release Date: 1783 | Tracklist

Review Summary: From the most critically acclaimed composer in history, you’d expect a little less filler…

My Music teacher said this to me once about Mozart’s piano style: ‘It’s very light and easy to listen to. It always does exactly what you expect it to’. After listening to this sonata, I couldn't agree more. Having a particular style is by no means a bad thing, but when it comes to the point whereby your audience can tell exactly what note will proceed before having heard it; can so accurately guess when a change of dynamic will occur; can foretell a key change because of the repetitive use of certain harmonic sequences, it might just mean you’re a tad predictable. Some people find this aspect of Mozart’s piano style comforting, but when looking for a musical experience, it leaves a lot to be desired.

The first movement, Andante Grazioso – a Theme with six Variations, begins the sonata with a relaxing, lullaby-like theme that could easily send the unsuspecting listener to sleep with seemingly unnecessary repeats of tedious passages. Mozart allows the listener to be cocooned in this hypnotically mind-numbing state of dreariness until five minutes in, in which he introduces a variation in a minor key. The occasional dissonances that Mozart allows himself to use in this section are just about the most interesting thing in the entire movement. It seems that Mozart’s only ever just doing enough to keep your attention – throwing in a dynamics change every now and then to barely compensate for the utterly predictable use of phrasing and lack of any textural ingenuity. What’s most worrying about this movement is that it’s based entirely on one theme supposedly worthy of six variations, yet I cannot recall a fraction of melody used in the entire movement. Go back to ‘Twinkle Twinkle Little Star’… you may not have written the original melody but at least it’s memorable.

Showing improvment on the first movement, the Menuetto demonstrates much better use of texture, juxtaposition of contrasting dynamics and decorative melody. It packs more ideas than found in the entirety of the arduous 14 minutes that is the first movement into six minutes worth of pleasant, above-average piano exploration. Whilst at times interesting, this movement collapses on itself by trying to be everything at once. Soft sections perfectly balanced with the boisterous; major sections slightly outweighing the minor; frills and trills placed right next to block chords etc… this movement goes to too many places leaving nothing to be appreciated. When there’s nothing remotely special by which the listener can remember it by. It feels almost as though 6 minutes of nothing had just been listened to.

Movement No. 3 is probably Mozart’s most famous piano piece: Rondo Alla Turca… and with good reason. We are finally reintroduced to the classy, ornamented melodies that made Mozart famous. This, combined with the humour and pompousness of the major sections, creates not a balance, but a stark contrast that Mozart uses to show his fun side. In just over three minutes, Mozart captures striking character and wit that is still often remembered today, and closes the sonata with both style and substance.

Whilst the ending movement is undeniably classic, it doesn’t stop five sixths of the sonata being unreasonably drawn out, devoid of any character and simply forgettable – mostly because of the predictability of Mozart’s piano style, but also because it’s simply not as entertaining as his other works. A poor effort overall.



Recent reviews by this author
Ukandanz AwoBig Big Train Folklore
Anna Meredith VarmintsSnarky Puppy Family Dinner, Vol. 2
Shiina Ringo Heisei FuuzokuShiina Ringo Hi Izuru Tokoro
user ratings (29)
3.8
excellent


Comments:Add a Comment 
SirArthur6
December 31st 2012


266 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

loooooooooooool I wrote a 2 review for Mozart



In all seriousness, I really dislike a lot of his piano pieces. Apart from a few they are duller than dishwater.

Calc
December 31st 2012


17340 Comments


Pos.

I have no idea whats going on in this review

mindleviticus
December 31st 2012


10486 Comments


uh this was made in 1783 of course it's going to be predictable

taylormemer
December 31st 2012


4964 Comments


What a stupid thing to say

Tyrael
December 31st 2012


21108 Comments


'uh this was made in 1783 of course it's going to be predictable'

Mozart was very original (some might say revolutionary) and therefore unpredictable for his time

so no

taylormemer
December 31st 2012


4964 Comments


What a stupid thing to say

Rev
December 31st 2012


9882 Comments


uh this was made in 1783 of course it's going to be predictable

jake you say dumb stuff all the time but wow

Calc
December 31st 2012


17340 Comments


not gonna lie that didnt make much sense.

mindleviticus
December 31st 2012


10486 Comments


lol @ you guys thinking what I said was serious

mindleviticus
December 31st 2012


10486 Comments


the review pretty much says that though in the first paragraph.

Poet
December 31st 2012


6144 Comments


Those listeners in 1783 totally knew what notes were going to be played next. That's why he was never
popular and people do not know who he really is today....it's a shame.

mindleviticus
December 31st 2012


10486 Comments


i know right

Poet
December 31st 2012


6144 Comments


It also happened to be the year John Hanson died.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hanson

YankeeDudel
December 31st 2012


9342 Comments


clearly wolfgang's most sterile work. please jeffrey pass the clam chowder.

mindleviticus
December 31st 2012


10486 Comments


It was also the year that a volcano killed 10 thousand people in Iceland

mindleviticus
December 31st 2012


10486 Comments


Anyways all joking aside, this is a good review. I just don't agree.

Adash
December 31st 2012


1355 Comments


Only Mozart that deserves less than a 4.5 is his Reqiuem, which is the single most stagnant, pathetic and stodgy piece of music ever

shame it written by the most perfect composer of all time, but he was sick and dying at the time so excuse is there

Tyrael
December 31st 2012


21108 Comments


His Requiem has a 4.6 average lol

taylormemer
December 31st 2012


4964 Comments


"which is the single most stagnant, pathetic and stodgy piece of music ever "

Oh, c'mon, that's a bit steep.

Adash
December 31st 2012


1355 Comments


That's what troubles me

Went to a performance of it and barely held out till the end, never ever had that before with a concert.

Shit is just so fucking pendulous for a composer whose talent lies in exquisite lightness



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy