The Pink Spiders
Hot Pink


4.0
excellent

Review

by joeker19lc USER (2 Reviews)
September 18th, 2013 | 15 replies


Release Date: 2005 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Sometimes sounding like the past makes you sound original.

The opening couple seconds of this album has the unmistakable sound of a needle being dropped onto a record. The disc of the cd is printed to look like a vinyl record. The Pink Spiders are aware of how retro-inspired they are with this album. There’s even something about the melodies that seems to call back to a time older than any of the members. It isn’t even the more obvious parts, like the occasional “do-wops”. It’s a motif that’s buried deeper than the album. The band is rooted in it.
“Stereo Speakers” is a strong album opener. Short and sweet, it introduces the listener to the sound to be expected on the rest of the album. Fun, energetic, treble-heavy. “Teenage Graffiti” continues this trend, erring a little more on the punk side of the band. “Knock Knock” is a little annoying at times, but the prechorus is one of the most retro moments of the album.
This brings us to the most repayable song on the album, in my opinion. “Going Steady” is a melodic beast in under minutes. Literally every aspect of this song is catchy. Lyrically it’s sleazy, and fun, and Matt Friction being as sexy as he can be. The tone of the guitar solo is really neat too.
“Hollywood Fix” is another good track and a strong follow up, again showcasing the bands retro-inspired gusto. It is easy to see why “Modern Swinger” wound up getting rerecorded on the follow up to this album. The chorus is just extremely strong. Lyrically it’s probably the most clever the album gets. “My baby’s pretty as a car crash / Sexy as the stinger of a hornet in your arm / Just another modern swinger” and “I think I’m tapping out / I’m gonna skip the title bout” are just really strong and really interesting phrasing.
“Talk Hard” is something of an anomaly. The verses have an odd mix of ska and, dare I say it, Eastern European / gypsy punk elements. This is brought to an abrupt end by the closest to metal that the Pink Spiders get on this album with the chorus. It’s peculiar, kind of like the screaming in the bridge of the song “Lovers Into Ghosts” from the previous EP, The Pink Spiders are Taking Over. The bridge of “Talk Hard” comes back to the retro-garage-pop-punk style, before abruptly jumping back into the chorus.
Unlike “Modern Swinger,” I’m not sure why “Little Razorblade” was picked as a rerecorded track for the next album. It’s one of the weaker tracks on the album. It’s very slow and over 4 minutes long. Those are two very un-The Pink Spiders traits. The song is easy to get bored during.
As far as instruments are concerned, the band is good, not phenomenal, not awful, but good. Perfect, in fact, for the style of music and the music of the style they try so hard to cultivate. Listen to a garage band of the 60s. Do you hear that bass? Me neither. The bassist isn’t doing anything mind blowing, but he is doing his job, as far as I can tell when I can hear him at least (“Modern Swinger”). Matt Friction does show his skill at playing guitar in the several guitar solos littering the album. It’s refreshing to listen to punk music with guitar solos. Like so much on this album, this is an echo of a previous time. There are enough drum fills to remind you that the drummer is actually a human being. The lofi nature of all the instruments blends well. It doesn’t feel lofi for the sake of lofi, which is just too common in the post-2000 music scene. Production quality can mask musical quality, both if it’s too present as well as not present enough. Luckily, the lack of sparkle and sheen to the album never holds it back, it adds to the overall feel. The inclusion of the occasional synth is interesting. One would typically think that the synth is a symbol of that sleek and sheen feel of an overproduced album. This never mars the Pink Spiders. It comes off more like an influence from the Cars than anything, which is helped by the fact that Ric Ocasek produced the follow-up to this album, Teenage Graffiti.
The album takes the point of view of the “bad boy” of the 50s. This isn’t an album about relationships, it’s about hook ups. It never comes off as cliché or like Matt Friction is a scum bag, even at his least romantic (“Going Steady”). The album only has a handful of boring moments, most of which are towards the end of the album. The fun tracks make up for it and make this an album I would happily recommend and relisten to at almost any moment. At their peak, I feel like the Pink Spiders were marketed to fans of pop-punk. I don’t think this did them justice. I would recommend this to fans of garage rock. It is way more of a garage rock album than a pop punk album.
Writing this convinced me to try and find / buy the vinyl version now. I can probably trick people into thinking I found a band that was really progressive for 1962.

Recommended tracks: Modern Swinger, Going Steady, Soft Smoke, Hollywood Fix


user ratings (12)
3.5
great

Comments:Add a Comment 
joeker19lc
September 18th 2013


9 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I should probably start to format my reviews better.

joeker19lc
September 18th 2013


9 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

And in case anyone is wondering, I determine what albums I review by putting my itunes library on shuffle and forcing myself to review the first thing that comes on.

Cygnatti
September 18th 2013


36023 Comments


the aesthetic of this band is fucking sweet. the formatting of this review is terrible though. add spaces between paragraphs plz.

Epitome
September 18th 2013


129 Comments


Hopefully the music is better than that atrocious band name

Cygnatti
September 18th 2013


36023 Comments


the music rather garage rock-esque. it's also has strong power pop and pop punk leanings. listening
now, it's very fun. if you dig really simple 70s punk of the poppier variety, then you should like
this.

joeker19lc
September 18th 2013


9 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

This was back when "the" band names were all the rage. This band does have an awesome aesthetic, Cygnatti. Band aesthetic is something kind of ruined by bands like Black Veil Brides. And yeah, I know about the formatting. I didn't realize when I copy and pasted from word that it would end up looking like some stupid geocities conspiracy theory.

Minus.
September 18th 2013


2747 Comments


Back when...2005? lol

joeker19lc
September 18th 2013


9 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Considering the band was formed in 2003 and was a garage rock revival band (I think, at least), it's almost inevitable that they had a "the" name. I should probably put more band background in my reviews too.

Cygnatti
September 18th 2013


36023 Comments


"the" bands are so 60s rock to 80s post punk. get with the times, bands!

Minus.
September 18th 2013


2747 Comments


" it's almost inevitable that they had a "the" name"

I've never thought of the early 2000's as being homogeneous to "The" names. I'm sure The Who, The
Beatles, The Doors, and The Cure would agree.

joeker19lc
September 18th 2013


9 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

The Strokes, The White Stripes, The Vines, The Hives. Sum 41 even makes fun of it in the music video for Still Waiting and call themselves The Sums. Obviously I'm making it more homogeneous than it really was, Yeah Yeah Yeahs were lumped in with that group from time to time and had a very the-less name.

joeker19lc
September 18th 2013


9 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I've never been a part of an internet community thing like this before, I'm worried I'm coming off like a douche. I'm not a douche, honest :p

LocustGrove
September 18th 2013


539 Comments


Dont worry, most of this site is full of douchebag poser elitists that barely have enough sense to wipe their asses. Good rule of thumb: if a band has more than 50,000 views on youtube, do NOT admit to liking the band or you will be ridiculed merciless for it.

joeker19lc
September 18th 2013


9 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Unless it's Circle Takes The Square, from what I gather

Cygnatti
September 18th 2013


36023 Comments


no way locust grove, this one sweet soul duo from 1968 has songs with 123,000 views on youtube, but it only has 5 votes on fucking rym. they haven't even been added to the sput db yet. I'd love anyone else that finds that "band/artist"! ^_^



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy