Switched
Subject to Change


2.5
average

Review

by STIGMATIZED USER (20 Reviews)
June 17th, 2022 | 8 replies


Release Date: 2002 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Living up to the album title… a little too well.

The nu-metal genre has always been a hit and miss genre and, by 2002, it was a very very oversaturated one; for every, unique band, there would be about eight coal chamber/linkin park clones and then one other band that was interesting (to varying degrees) but fell by the wayside. And so here we are, with one of those latter bands, Switched. During their rather brief mainstream existence had one hit single, “Inside”, which pushed them into the major labels and subsequently dissipated in popularity rather quickly during the Music Sea-ne change of 2003. So, I thought “why not listen to it?” And now, here I am reviewing the band’s only major label album, Subject To Change.

Like the album cover and title suggests, Subject To Change is a strange looking beast, modern yet a little bit cerebral at the same, and a very, very confusing meld of polar opposites. Throughout the album there’s influences of bands such as Deftones, Type O Negative, P.O.D., Korn/Adema and even Botch (to some degree), creating a sound that is industrial-heavy, sometimes thrashy/speedy/groovy, and yet still somewhat melodic and accessible nu-metal; and extremely far removed from being stereotypically “formulaic”. The dual guitars have weird levels of interplay and varying time signatures between the two but still pull off the job of making the meld work. The guitars duel between uproaring melodic choruses and drop-A tuned nu-metal numbers at varying speeds and frequencies. This is generally hit and miss at times and doesn’t always work in the band’s favour, such as on “Skins” and “Last Chance”. In some songs, the bass is required to hold the mix together such as on “Darkening Days”; while it is smothered most of the time under the guitars, it is best used for glue during the verses when there is usually sparse use of guitars. Tying this strange mixture is Ben Schigel, whose vocals are like Korn’s Johnathan Davis, but more akin to a less whiny Mark Chavez (Adema); he is best described as the b-st-rd child of Matt Heacock (American Head Charge) and Sonny Salvadol (P.O.D.). Unlike what you’d assume he does, he isn’t a “regular” vocalist; while not perfect, he manages to adapt Walter Schriefels-esque mannerisms in being able to not make words rhyme (most of the time) but still flow with the music while he does his almost tremolo speed back-and-forth between screaming and singing vocals, while remaining confident in whichever style he chooses.

However, this confusing mixture is what ultimately gives Subject To Change a sense of irony in the name; as much as the music changes, so does the quality. Songwriting is a major issue on the album; the completely inconsistent nature of the album and its chaotic nature/refusal to sit still in one place at a time does at times create a terrifying sense of melody but more often than not tends to trip over itself when trying to move from the verses to the choruses. This problem is especially worse in the bridges, which 10 out of 13 times on the album struggle to have a proper transition from chorus to bridge and back to chorus, such as on “10 Dead Fingers” and “Anymore”; this isn’t to say some of the bridges aren’t good however (e.g. on “Exterminate” and “Reflections”), but for the most part ruins the flows of most of the songs (especially on “Wrongside”) and are weak. The almost omnipresent nature of this problem on Subject To Change makes the overall experience less enjoyable, especially when some songs like “Walk Away” and “Spread” are really average otherwise. This inconsistency is best reflected, however, in the vocals of Ben Schigel, who doesn't have in mind a clear identity of what he wants to be. This leads to some strange moments throughout the album, such as his attempts at scat singing on “Religion” and his odd scream sing alterations on “Four Walls”. Overall, this makes the experience quite jarring and not exactly something to sing along to; not even “Inside”, the album’s “hit” single, is easy to enjoy on first listen. The band has made themselves so complicated that things that sound accessible are, instead, not; leaving the album’s direction and targets largely unclear to the listener.

So to close this off, this album is not innately broken or poorly performed (quite the opposite); but it fails to hold itself together, and thereon becomes a bloody mutated mess on the floor rather than a powerful musical cyborg; while not awful, it is not great either. Subject To Change is exactly what it says it is; so inconsistent and so changing that it’s a different beast from the rest of the nu metal fodder, but ultimately so rapidly changing it is unable to finish anything properly. A difficult listening experience, but not in composition or atmosphere; just in idiosyncrasy.

2.5/5

Listen to the album here: https://youtu.be/CRn8xfNRSFI



Recent reviews by this author
Human Waste Project E-luxOtep House of Secrets
Story of the Year Tear Me to PiecesBrougham Le Cock Sportif
aespa GirlsWeezer SZNZ: Summer
user ratings (41)
3.4
great


Comments:Add a Comment 
STIGMATIZED
June 17th 2022


363 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Done purely out of the reason… just because. Boredom filler.



I’ll likely revisit “inside”, but a significant proportion of the album is “wtf?”

STIGMATIZED
June 17th 2022


363 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

also: SONGS LISTED



GOOD SONGS



Inside, Four walls, 10 Dead Fingers, Anymore, Wrongside, EXTERMINATE, Darkening days,



MEH SONGS



Walk away, Religion, Reflections, Skins, Last chance



BAD SONGS



Spread (lacking in the wierd qualities and is just like “I’m fucking done now”)



Kompys2000
Emeritus
June 17th 2022


9428 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Damn I think this one got some big jams lol



agreed the band is kind of a walking identity crisis but the album is foremost an immensely visceral production experience so it's sorta hard to care

STIGMATIZED
June 17th 2022


363 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

The production is definitely quality, and evidently good songs, so can agree. But while identity crises can be good this is a… er, bad execution of an identity crisis



Good production cannot hide bad identity crises.



As an album experience it sucks but as individual songs this is more enjoyable. Honesty wasn’t too sure to give it a 3

To be honest as a comparison, the dismemberment plan is terrified; compared to that album in character variation and musical style, there’s more variety. I can’t help feeling like subject to change is boxed in a bit

pizzamachine
June 17th 2022


27131 Comments


Another identity crisis album. 😰

STIGMATIZED
June 17th 2022


363 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

no they've got a different disorder. They've got "Nulla Fundamenta Solida" (NFS) disorder. Not SORD-16

Also trust me. there'll be an alamac at some point

autoNamed
June 18th 2022


210 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I think this record is full of bangers tbh

goodsitebaduserbase
January 23rd 2024


253 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

^ it is and the picture is cool too



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy