Eric Clapton
461 Ocean Boulevard


2.5
average

Review

by doctorjimmy USER (60 Reviews)
November 12th, 2016 | 16 replies


Release Date: 1974 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Further into blandland territory, it seems. Well, there's always Derek And The Dominos, right?

I am reviewing the original release that lacks "Better Make It Through Today" and closes with "Mainline Florida"

After getting out of his heroin addiction in 1973, Clapton decided it was time to get back in business. With a large number of songs he wanted to cover, as well as a few originals, he created 461 Ocean Boulevard, which became one of the most commercially successful records of his career.

Overall, this seems like a slight improvement over his debut. First of all, the production and arrangements give Clapton the prominence he deserves. The laid-back and precise guitar playing is the main attraction here, with various keyboards and harmonica thrown in for good measure. Judging by the atmosphere on some of the songs here, this release has to be the start of Eric’s fascination with the famous “Tulsa sound”. I’m no expert when it comes to this particular roots rock sub-genre, but tunes like Get Ready, I Can’t Hold Out, Steady Rolling Man are certainly inspired by guys like JJ Cale. Not to mention that the rhythm section throughout is comprised by Tulsa specialists Carl Radle and Jamie Oldaker on bass and drums, respectively.

Songwriting-wise, the album is almost entirely comprised by covers of solidly written, but hardly attention-grabbing songs. Only Let It Grow and Get Ready were penned by Eric (with help from Yvonne Elliman for the latter), while Mainline Florida was written specifically for the record by George Terry. The classic Let It Grow is the obvious best cut from here; being a sequel of Let It Rain (even the titles are similar!), it is similarly epic and dramatic in style, with layers of weeping guitars complementing each other under the gentle vocal harmonies. And you certainly have to hear the album closer; just a good rocker, but that magnificent guitar break after the chorus is worth your time.

As for the biggest hit from here, I Shot The Sheriff, it’s just a safe easy listening rendition, period. However, it is a great cut for analyzing what exactly is wrong with his solo output in general. First, his singing is unremarkable; there aren’t a lot of classic rock guitarists with interesting, let alone gifted, voices and Clapton is no exception. Too mellow for aggressive cuts, not enough passionate or devoted for more gentle situations. Simply plain (no pun). Second, and I will go in further length below, the execution of the songs is sterile. Clapton and his backing bands certainly have a vast knowledge of the genres they’re covering, but instead of putting their own stamp and soul into the songs, they go all “academic” and “proper” instead of letting loose.

To focus on the main star, there is still a shortage of captivating guitar riffs, solos and fills throughout. Clapton is surely more dominant here than on his debut, but the actual guitar work isn’t anything special. I won't make a fuss about the generic nature of the riffs; he never was a gifted songwriter, so let’s leave it at that. But the man has gone all stiff and strict when it comes to lead playing after his Dominos days.

Just compare his phrasing on Live At The Fillmore from three years prior to any solo here. In 1970, Clapton was brimming with passion, enthusiasm and an unmistakable identity in his playing. In 1974, he was mostly sticking to uninteresting rhythm parts (not a gifted rhythm player, either) and occasionally delivering derivative solos that could have been composed by anyone. Steady Rolling Man is a prime example of that “formal soloing”. The kind of soloing you would expect a guitar student to play. The kind of soloing that would get that same guitar student an “A+” and a loving, proud kiss from his sweet mom, who always wanted her son to be a cool guitarist, like that Clapton guy she used to have a fad with in her teenage years. Getting too far? Not at all.

To clarify one thing, I’m not against the whole laid-back Tulsa sound scene. I’m no enthusiast for the scene, but it certainly has its charms. What I am certainly bored with is the lack of creativity. Dire Straits had a Tulsa-oriented sound, too, but it was ten times more creative and passionate than this (at least on their debut). Knopfler brought classical sensibilities to the mix, as well as a unique soloing style all of his own. Clapton is just rehashing the old blues cliches here and it’s incredibly sad to see such an enormously gifted guitarist go to waste.

To sum up, this is pleasant background music, but hardly useful for anything else. I can’t find the soul and inspiration here, neither any particular fresh idea. How one of the mightiest guitar heroes has fallen, sadly...With his prime lasting just five years before his steady decline into safe territory, there’s only one question for the suspecting listener. Did he actually lose his muse so fast or he just wanted to alter his image? The following albums will tell...



Recent reviews by this author
Eric Clapton Eric ClaptonThe Rolling Stones Out of Our Heads
The Animals The Animals (US)Earth, Wind and Fire That's The Way of The World
The Rolling Stones AftermathEarth, Wind and Fire Head to the Sky
user ratings (182)
3.8
excellent


Comments:Add a Comment 
DrJohn
November 12th 2016


1041 Comments


think you're a bit hard on this but opinions... interesting read nonetheless

Koris
Staff Reviewer
November 13th 2016


21121 Comments


Nice review. I've always preferred Clapton's work in Cream over his solo work anyway

Zig
November 13th 2016


2747 Comments


Great review. There's maybe two or three interesting riffs, Motherless Children being the best one. That Bob Marley cover...

manosg
Emeritus
November 13th 2016


12708 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

This is actually one of my favorite solo albums of his but as far as the sound of this album is concerned, I prefer JJ Cale's work.

rockandmetaljunkie
November 13th 2016


9620 Comments


Good review. Clapton never managed to captivate me with his solo work and this album is not an exception.

doctorjimmy
November 13th 2016


386 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

thanks for the replies, guys. without wanting to copy the views of manosg, i agree with him that the best clapton is in disraeli, beano and layla



as far as the sound of this album is concerned, I prefer JJ Cale's work.




Ditto, Cale feels somewhat more natural to me



vonseux
November 14th 2016


363 Comments


2.5, really?

doctorjimmy
November 14th 2016


386 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

oh yes

doctorjimmy
November 14th 2016


386 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

also, I'd like to urge the downvoters of this review to, like, make an argument or something. was the review badly written? you just don't agree with the rating/opinion? just speak; the comment section is there for a reason: to start a conversation

manosg
Emeritus
November 14th 2016


12708 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

The down-voting thing is quite weird by itself since Eric Clapton doesn't seem to have many fans on here, to start with.

wham49
November 14th 2016


6341 Comments


I think the fans of Clapton on this site are for his contribution to the great bands he was a part of, not his solo career which is borish to say the least, nuggets of great stuff, but Clap as part of a group is so much better

let it grow is good off of this

manosg
Emeritus
November 14th 2016


12708 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Definitely agree. As far as his solo work is concerned, I always perceived him more as a historian rather than a bluesman, if this makes any sense. It doesn't help either that all great blues albums were released before EC started his solo career.

wham49
November 14th 2016


6341 Comments


I have always thought that his interpretations of blues standards are vanilla, he seems to put no joy or swing into them at all.

doctorjimmy
November 14th 2016


386 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

The down-voting thing is quite weird by itself since Eric Clapton doesn't seem to have many fans on here, to start with




Great observation. Has any of his albums more than 200 votes here? To clarify, I don't mind the downvotes. It's just a pity that the downvoters don't propose any arguments

manosg
Emeritus
November 14th 2016


12708 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

"I have always thought that his interpretations of blues standards are vanilla, he seems to put no joy or swing into them at all."



Yup, he is slowhand alright even though he has some interesting covers of Little Wing especially one with David Sanborn on sax.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEuVH_16vRg

parksungjoon
April 3rd 2021


47231 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

This one isn't bad. There's nothing as offensive as his later hits circa Slowhand. But it's bland and homogenous, which is something of a problem. Granted, it's also diverse, with Clapton tackling not just blues and '70s pop but also gospel, reggae, funk, and bluegrass! So how can an album be diverse and homogenous? I'll tell you how: when you Claptonify every genre you tackle. It would be more accurate for me to say that there are shades of each of these genres on this album, because each one is drained of their individuality and replaced with a sort of Claptonality. If he was going for something of an Instrumentality Project involving those genres, then he succeeded - he makes them all seem laid-back, smooth, polished, and void of all personality except for a sort of lazy pleasantness.



Take his version of "I Shot the Sheriff." A long ways from awful, but it comes off as pretty lame when contrasted with the barely controlled anger of the original. He took it to #1 and gave a lot of Americans their first taste of reggae, but it happened at the expense of the genre itself. Thus began a long tradition of white guys paying reggae in the lamest way imaginable. His attempts at blues are also pretty lame. "I Can't Hold Out" mentions phones a lot, which is appropriate, because he phones it in, while "Steady Rollin' Man" is the exact opposite of how a Robert Johnson song should sound. I want "barely restrained, haunting intensity," not "blandness." "Motherless Children" tries to kick up some dust, but he's trying too hard, and you can tell he'd rather be Captain MOR. And when he tries that, you get dull songs like "Get Ready" or "Mainline Florida." So really, it's only "Let it Grow" that works, and that's mostly because it's got a nice guitar hook at the end - the main body of it is dull as fuck. Better than the Eagles, yeah, but sort of coming from the same general area.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy