Ghoulgotha
To Starve the Cross


4.0
excellent

Review

by slapguitarer USER (1 Reviews)
August 8th, 2016 | 181 replies


Release Date: 2016 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Rewriting the book on death metal.

Maintaining a level of authenticity and integrity can be tricky when a band decides to step outside convention, especially when it comes to death metal. Most bands that decide to think outside the death metal box do so by way of overzealous musicianship, incorporating sounds from non-metal genres, or abandoning form in favor of creating music that is suffocating and cacophonous. Is there anything wrong with that? Of course not, but it’d be great to see more bands advance the style from within, instead of reaching out. Fortunately, we have bands like Ghoulgotha.

Ghoulgotha completely flip death metal on its head while remaining completely in the scope of death metal. The band’s sound is firmly rooted in old school death metal and death/doom, with a combination of fast, aggressive guitar work and slow, lugubrious riffs. What separates Ghoulgotha’s sound from their contemporaries is their masterful use of rhythmic variation. The band is quick to change tempo, even if only for one measure, or from one riff to another. Switching from speedy furry to morose brutality only adds to the non-Euclidian structure of these songs. Meter is also at play, with time signatures switching from simple to compound at a moments notice. The band is very comfortable with odd time signatures, and on top of that time signatures are never stable, with phrases ending in a different time signature than it started in. Certain phrases are repeated in odd intervals as well, and sometimes songs that seemingly end with a funeral trudge are tagged with a fast lick at the end, further adding to the unconventional and mind-bending nature of Ghoulgotha’s music. You can’t tap your feet to this music.

Ghoulgotha’s taste for melody is interesting too. Like most death metal bands, Ghoulgotha’s riffs and melodies are often in a minor mode, but there are times the music is pushing more on pantonal and downright chromatic. These moments are some of the most chaotic and engaging this album has to offer. But don’t think the band is only writing weirdo riffs. Songs like “Visceral Seas” showcase the band at their most melodic, which showcases their ear for melodies that range from sorrowful to anthemic. Coupling rhythmic eccentricities with unpredictable melodic content, To Starve The Cross proves to be a very exciting and engaging album, leaving listeners on their toes the way a horror flick might (idk I don’t like scary movies tbh).

The production on the record is stellar. The guitar tone is raw and visceral, adding an extra layer of gross to the vicious nature of these riffs. Another feature I love about this record is how warm and round the bass tone is, keeping the record from sounding too sharp. The record’s dark atmosphere is what cements this as a great death metal record to me. While many other bands try experimenting with death metal in ways similar to what Ghoulgotha do, many bands bastardize the sound by trying to add too many layers of “complexity” to the music and by polishing the sound, taking away from the grime and grit the style is known for. Instead of turning death metal into something it’s not, Ghoulgotha flip it on its head, creating something completely new and exciting but all too familiar in the process.


user ratings (29)
3.3
great


Comments:Add a Comment 
Sinternet
Contributing Reviewer
August 8th 2016


26572 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

Bad album yeah

ScuroFantasma
Emeritus
August 8th 2016


11974 Comments


Cool review, you clearly know your theory and for a band like this it's useful, nice to see in a write-up too. You make this sound appealing so I'll check it out even if I wasn't impressed by what I heard from the debut.

Couple things to watch in the review, you repeat some words in really close proximity; "Meter is also at play, with time signatures switching from simple to compound at a moments notice. The band is very comfortable with odd time signatures, and on top of that time signatures are never stable, with phrases ending in a different time signature than it started in." time signatures here.

"Euclidian" *Euclidean, nice word though.

Anyway, great review man, keep at it.

Sinternet
Contributing Reviewer
August 8th 2016


26572 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

still shit tho

Pon
Emeritus
August 8th 2016


5986 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

oh boy : )

Space Jester
August 8th 2016


11000 Comments


Oh shit here we go

Album rules, review is rad too minus the little stuff that ScuroFantasma mentioned.

Space Jester
August 8th 2016


11000 Comments


Hey Jac nice dig, I should be getting that in the mail in the next couple of weeks. Haven't listened to it yet tho

Futures
August 8th 2016


10490 Comments


just a god awful band

Spacesh1p
August 8th 2016


7716 Comments


"Pretty fascinating watching you interact on this site. You'll adhere to your contrarian nature, even when it makes you look like you have bad taste. Really impressed by your dedication to false individuality."

You're quite the asshole.

Space Jester
August 8th 2016


11000 Comments


Lol how can this album get bashed for being basic yet Triumvir Foul gets a 3.5

TheSpirit
Emeritus
August 8th 2016


30304 Comments


rewriting the book on the death metal seems a bit hyperbolic, but i'd still like to check this out. the single wasn't *terrible*, but it certainly wasn't great. good review though.

ShadowRemains
August 8th 2016


27742 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

rewriting the book on the death metal seems a bit hyperbolic


understatement of the year

TheSpirit
Emeritus
August 8th 2016


30304 Comments


that also seems a bit hyperbolic, but maybe my threshold for that is low or something

Sinternet
Contributing Reviewer
August 8th 2016


26572 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

to starve the world of quality music

Sinternet
Contributing Reviewer
August 8th 2016


26572 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

lamest name in history as well did they get it from a band name generator

ScuroFantasma
Emeritus
August 8th 2016


11974 Comments


"that also seems a bit hyperbolic, but maybe my threshold for that is low or something"

It's the lowest


Space Jester
August 9th 2016


11000 Comments


Ghoulgotha is a great death metal name what are you people on about

Sinternet
Contributing Reviewer
August 9th 2016


26572 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

serious question: are you retarded?

Futures
August 9th 2016


10490 Comments


Ghoulgotha

Sinternet
Contributing Reviewer
August 9th 2016


26572 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

it's the kind of name Richmond from IT Crowd would call his Cradle of Filth cover band

Gameofmetal
Emeritus
August 9th 2016


11565 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

thread is really fucking bad rn



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy