The Velvet Underground The Velvet Underground & Nico
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
JigglyPDiddy
June 2nd 2016


3721 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

there goes sinternet with the amazing avatars

Frippertronics
Emeritus
June 2nd 2016


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

needs more Nico

JigglyPDiddy
June 2nd 2016


3721 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Get a Nico gif from one of those really old B/W silent TVU video recordings then we'll talk.

Sinternet
Contributing Reviewer
June 2nd 2016


26573 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

hey if i don't supply the awesome avatars who's gonna? you'll be stuck with toondude

JigglyPDiddy
June 2nd 2016


3721 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

toondude has had some great ones, but I don't trust him after he cloned himself to pull off that heist on the site not so long ago.

Frippertronics
Emeritus
June 2nd 2016


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I prefer Marble Index-era Nico tyvm

JigglyPDiddy
June 2nd 2016


3721 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Oh, excuse me lol but Banana-eating Nico was awesome too.

lyzakthellama
June 2nd 2016


2113 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Am I the only one who thinks this albums is super front loaded

JigglyPDiddy
June 2nd 2016


3721 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I actually preffer the second half at times. It's pretty balanced, imo.

danielcardoso
June 2nd 2016


11770 Comments


This is consistently good.

parksungjoon
June 2nd 2016


47234 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

rules

doctorjimmy
June 2nd 2016


386 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

they are playing anything but blues on here, really

and honestly a song like all tomorrow's parties alone already makes this album better than 99% of rock


even a rock novice would know these two songs I mentioned are garage blues rock. and, really, "all tomorrow's parties" better than 99% of rock? dude, do you even listen to rock? smh

PlasticRadioBand
June 2nd 2016


409 Comments


Sach may have a point tho. Like I mean Kid Cudi tried to do prog and look what happened

My fav Nico is a tie between Marble Index and Chelsea Girls

danielcardoso
June 2nd 2016


11770 Comments


Do you even rock, bro?



But on a serious note, for a guy who gave this 3.5 you seem to be hating on this a little bit too much jimmy. This is not a stab at you at all, just pointing it out.

doctorjimmy
June 2nd 2016


386 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

i'm not hating on it, not really bud. I just find the album incredibly inconsistent, that's what I hate about it. Half of the album I absolutely love. The other half seems like filler or boring stuff to me. That's all ;)

Cygnatti
June 2nd 2016


36026 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

even a rock novice would know these two songs I mentioned are garage blues rock. and, really, "all tomorrow's parties" better than 99% of rock? dude, do you even listen to rock? smh

rock music is a 3.0/5 genre. he's not totally wrong.

parksungjoon
June 2nd 2016


47234 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

more like cyg / 5

Cygnatti
June 2nd 2016


36026 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

i lied, tbh. it's at least a 3.5/5.

doctorjimmy
June 2nd 2016


386 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

rock music is a 3.0/5 genre. he's not totally wrong


this is why sterilization should be a thing again

Cygnatti
June 2nd 2016


36026 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

not my fault guitar music is inferior and homogenized, bud.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy