You can't make a summary like that in a non BTBAM-review.
|
| |
I don't know how to feel about this review lol, on one hand it's not wrong and on the other hand it's full of punchable snark
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
thomas really went off on this album [2]
Yeah the drums are really standing out in way they don't normally do for me when listening to CoL. I'm here for it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Punchable snark is Johnny’s recognised nickname
|
| |
Loving this album so far. I disagree with a lot of this review; there’s lots of ‘new’ ways they’re refining and improving their sounds, and ultimately the execution is what counts most, which is exceptional for the most part here. Blood Upon Stone is an absolute monster of a track.
|
| |
You seem more annoyed that someone might disagree with the reviewer, which is pretty weird. Mildly disagreeing is hardly getting annoyed, is it?
|
| |
No problem.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
adequate
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
nice summary of your life so far, but what about the album?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
SHEEEEESH
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
is it bad that im listening to the new A&P album more than this
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I dunno, probably.
This is very good.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
pwn'd
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.2
Yes that’s bad
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
What's A&P?
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
guns & roses
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Author & Punisher?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
new a&p is incredible, yeah
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.2
How this thread doesn't already have a 1000 comments is bizarre. 2012 Sput would put you guys to shame.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Anatomy & Physiology
|
| |
|