Angel Olsen All Mirrors
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Handers
October 16th 2019


10 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

folk album? wtf

Sowing
Moderator
October 16th 2019


43954 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

2 out of her 3 genre tags on this site have the word folk in them

People may or may not be fixating on a minor detail instead of discussing the album/review lol

theBoneyKing
October 16th 2019


24428 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Yeah it's mostly a pedantic point. It just kind of stands out because you call it a folk album in the summary. Imo there's basically nothing of folk here, nor was there on My Woman, which was mostly indie rock with some dream pop and Americana (and even Burn Your Fire was pretty evenly split between indie rock and folk).

Atari
Staff Reviewer
October 16th 2019


27971 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

this is about as productive as arguing if Agalloch are really black metal, lol





Sowing
Moderator
October 16th 2019


43954 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Perhaps my lack of context with Olsen is showing, but I figured between the rampant folk tags on her page and the fact that this did not sound exclusively "pop" to me, that it was a safely accurate summary. Perhaps I can edit it so we can move on.

budgie
October 16th 2019


35533 Comments


nope sowing it's too late damage is done we all hate you now

theBoneyKing
October 16th 2019


24428 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Yeah like I said it's just a technicality point, just giving the context to explain why calling this folk is objectionable.

Sowing
Moderator
October 16th 2019


43954 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

It's fair, like I said, I'm not well versed on her approach and felt that "a blend of folk and art-pop" was apt. I've stripped the summary and review of any mention of folk, so anyway, beautiful album right guys?

Cormano
October 17th 2019


4105 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

beautiful folk

Sowing
Moderator
October 17th 2019


43954 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I know, right? ;-)

unclereich
October 17th 2019


12057 Comments


glad I missed this argument, album is swee

robin
October 17th 2019


4596 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Perhaps my lack of context with Olsen is showing, but I figured between the rampant folk tags on her page and the fact that this did not sound exclusively "pop" to me, that it was a safely accurate summary. Perhaps I can edit it so we can move on.




it's not a big deal but yes it shows, she hasn't made folk music for two records, three if we're being real. i would think maybe the problem was that it felt like a bit of a statement / you were saying something by referring to it as folk in the header, in this context - specifically as if it were her making a New kind of folk album, was how i read it. which, i'd disagree!, but that's the context i read it in. because this is incredibly not a folk record, and doesn't even trade in anything olsen's done before, really, minus like 'intern'

Sowing
Moderator
October 17th 2019


43954 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

That's fair, as the summary typically reads as a boldface headline. This was a passion review more than a thesis, as the original staffer dropped dibs I just felt like filling in with something of a hot take. I tried not to take too many risks with the wording - "to-date" or "best of" are clearly off-limits given the lack of context, for example - but I still got caught via the genre I chose to partially tag this as. I updated it to art-pop (just removed the part of the sentence/summary about folk), so hopefully it reads a little more sensibly now to the long time fans.

theBoneyKing
October 17th 2019


24428 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I can sympathize - there have been times I've wanted to write a review but didn't feel comfortable because I was new to the artist.

In any case I thank you for writing this (and it's characteristically great), I have a feeling this got less discussion than it should have in its first week because it didn't have a review (though the fact that it leaked probably didn't help either).

Sowing
Moderator
October 17th 2019


43954 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Agreed, leaks lead to an "old news" feel by the time an album hits its actual release date. I appreciate the compliment, and although I'm sure there were better candidates to write about this album, I can assure you that I did not suppress anyone in the process haha.

BigHans
October 17th 2019


30959 Comments


Opener is a straight banger

Sowing
Moderator
October 17th 2019


43954 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Yeah Lark is probably my second favorite here to the other bookend, Chance. Both are in my top 25 songs this year.

DoofDoof
October 17th 2019


15066 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

both in the top 2500 songs this year [2]

WatchItExplode
October 17th 2019


10457 Comments


Very surprised at how much I ended up enjoying this

nuklearmoose
October 18th 2019


121 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Chance is sooooo damn beautiful. ugh. Then, when Chance finishes and goes back into Lark, I can't help but listen to the whole album again. Such a moving album



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy