Underoath Define the Great Line
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
br3ad_man
Emeritus
June 23rd 2006



2125 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

No he isn't, Spencer is the only unoriginal member.

Storm In A Teacup
June 23rd 2006



12688 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

3.5 is the lowest rating this has yet other than REINER who gave it a 1. :lol:
I'm surprised this still isn't old and I feel like I haven't even fully exlpored the songs. They're talking to me like, "come, listen to us more and prick and poke, we like that".

Electric City
Staff Reviewer
June 23rd 2006



15693 Comments


To be honest, I'm not crazy about Christian hardcore. So I don't care who's better, underOATH or Norma Jean.

Digging: Nmesh - Dream Sequins® [AMDISCS]

rdn008
June 23rd 2006



24 Comments


wow......this album is bad.....i was expectin this to be like TOCS but better.....something like atreyu. It turned out to be nothing but screaming...no singing in it =(....only good song in wrighting on the walls

Storm In A Teacup
June 23rd 2006



12688 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Obviously you don't have the album and are a liar. There is plenty of singing in this.

rdn008
June 23rd 2006



24 Comments


i just bought it this morning....... only have listenend to it once

The Sludge
June 23rd 2006



2169 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I like this so much, I think I might end up giving TOCS another chance, I mean, I'll give it an open mind this spin around.

xemoXkidx917
June 23rd 2006



2 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

amazing cd
amazing review

i love this album 2 death (had it over 3 months already)

dropped onto the floor haha

im really happy that it didnt become what i thought it would be

5/5

Iluvatar
Staff Reviewer
June 23rd 2006



16072 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

If you've had it for 3 months, you likely have the shat version that isn't completely done. Cheers.

Iluvatar
Staff Reviewer
June 23rd 2006



16072 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

So, sure its only the 4th day its on the site, but this album has inexplicably hit no. 5 on the overall chart. A little more than surprising.

rdn008
June 24th 2006



24 Comments


yeah.....i listened to it a few more times and i still agree with my first statement..... Every song on this album is just a bunch of screeming with a few lines of singing in it. I prefer TOCS style- verse (screeming) -chourus (singing) - verse - chourus.... this albun seems like it has no chouruses in it.

labonza01
June 24th 2006



546 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Thats because they took a step away from the mainstream, and IMO, and seemingly almost everybody elses, its much, much better than TOCS. Accept some change man, it's for the better.

mynameischan
Staff Reviewer
June 24th 2006



17914 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

i was pleasantly surprised by this...seeing as their older stuff is crap. its definitely a big step in the right direction, though its still nothing special.

jameskukucka
June 24th 2006



308 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

was never really into underoath btu decided to pick this up for th elow low price of 7.99. Its a great album underoaths best the only reaosn i give it a 3.5 is I don't really care for underoath that much

Storm In A Teacup
June 24th 2006



12688 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

[quote=]i just bought it this morning....... only have listenend to it once[/quote]You must not be a very good listener then because there is quite a bit of singing throughout.

chad^
June 25th 2006



16 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Yea.. I've noticed there weren't many repeated choruses on this album (except for A Moment Suspended in Time... which I thought was going to be the single when i first heard the leaked version because of it's cliche'd structure.) I like this different style of not just having the same, played out song structure (verse, chorus, verse, chorus, bridge, chorus x3.) A lot of their songs still contain a lot of catchiness without this method; I think it worked really well :D.

I've been listening to this album for over 2-3 months, and I still can't get enough of it.

Best Album of 2006, IMO.

ddnyy11188
June 27th 2006



38 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Yeah, and apparently it's selling well, stuff I've read is varying between 50 to over 100,000 for its first week. I know this isn't what's important, but its awesome to see them achieving this kind of success with such a heavy record. Sure, it's not heavy compared to alot of other music I listen to, but it's pretty darn heavy to be selling that many copies in its first week.

f_u_c_t
June 28th 2006



1406 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

^ i like to know stuff like that. Its interesting to see what albums are selling real well. And this is pretty hard music to be selling like Britney Spears would. haha

one relic
June 28th 2006



4 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Fantastic review!
Totally spot on with all your comments and observations of the band and their albums. It's good to come across someone other than my handful of friends who know the history behind the band.

/two thumbs up

BAR-UnarmeD
June 28th 2006



20 Comments


Quote:
No he isn't, Spencer is the only unoriginal member.


No.
You know nothing.



It is YOU who knows nothing. Dallas being replaced by Spencer was the only change the band in respect to its members went through.This Message Edited On 06.28.06



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2013 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy