Russian Circles Guidance
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
ramon.
August 18th 2016


4184 Comments


While I agree with the subjectivity/objectivity argument, I can't help but think you should have 5'd at least 50 other post records considering you 5'd this.

Good album. Nice review

AsleepInTheBack
Staff Reviewer
August 18th 2016


10117 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Hm yeah if you think this is a 5 I could see you 5ing a lot of other post rock stuff. That being said, it's a pretty emotive and personal genre and so if one record clicks with you it just does, regardless of whether there are objectivity better records

minty901
August 18th 2016


3976 Comments


Couldn't agree with you more AsleepInTheBack. It's why you see soooo many post-rock reviews start with "post-rock is a dead genre but THIS album is something special" when the album they're talking about is fairly typical for the genre. Certain stuff just happens to connect with someone and there's no way of explaining it beyond that.

But still, I'm a big fan of post-rock. And even despite what I said... I can't work out a way of understanding that this album could be a 5. I just don't feel like it's really emotive in any way. It's fun to headbang to and fun to ride along with but. I don't know. Again, it all comes down to subjectivity.

redrig
August 18th 2016


220 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

def not a 5, good album tho.

AsleepInTheBack
Staff Reviewer
August 18th 2016


10117 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Eloquently put minty, agreed with you there

dbizzles
August 18th 2016


15193 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Coming in hot with a 4 rating. feelsgoodman.

MercuryToHell
August 18th 2016


1362 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

It's not a great feeling right now, but meh, it's still up there for me.

StarlessCore
August 18th 2016


7752 Comments


man these guys are a snoozefest. interesting that ballou produced tho

minty901
August 18th 2016


3976 Comments


MercuryToHell stick to your guns man. feel good about your decision. theres nothing worse than when critics seek to homogenise themselves with everyone elses opinions.

MercuryToHell
August 18th 2016


1362 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

The thing is, I completely get the 'this is not a 5' thing, and why I should use the same logic on other post releases, and that this may not even remain so high for me.

But truth is, this album engaged me more than any release in years, whether that says a lot for my own personal bar or tastes or not is another story but it's just how I felt and still do currently.

insomniac15
Staff Reviewer
August 18th 2016


6178 Comments

Album Rating: 3.4

It's a nice album, but nowhere near a 5. After I heard Vorel I hoped it was gonna be heavy, however, it's one of their most subdued releases so far.

StarlessCore
August 18th 2016


7752 Comments


i bet its not even a 5/10

Sniff
August 18th 2016


8049 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

If it's a five for you then it's a five for you. No matter what other people say about it.

minty901
August 18th 2016


3976 Comments


dont take it as an insult to your personal bar or tastes. just own it. my favourite album of all time is Damage by Jimmy Eat World. its a solid 5 and always has been. but that album gets absolutely slammed on sputnik! but it doesnt matter cause i know what works for me and i know my opinion is no less valuable than anyone else on this site. getting to see things from the perspective of people who have very different experiences and opinions is what makes sites like this so awesome. so yeah, fucking own it man and its awesome that this album connects with you and theres no reason why it shouldnt. i love it when that happens.

Sniff
August 18th 2016


8049 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I could easily get why people five this. Whereas on the other hand I would have a hard time understanding how people can five Jimmy Eat Wold

Artuma
August 18th 2016


32769 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

nothing wrong with fiving that one certain jimmy eat world album...

minty901
August 18th 2016


3976 Comments


@Sniff exactly. Makes my point. Obviously I don't agree but I won't derail the thread by going on about it. I'm still not as excited by this album as I was with Memorial, but I wonder if that's just because Memorial came first. They are so similar; maybe if this came first it would have blown me away.

Sniff
August 18th 2016


8049 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

To me this has the energy that I think Memorial lacked.

PortalofPerfection
August 19th 2016


3158 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Lisboa needs some love, it's one hell of a closer.

Futures
August 19th 2016


10507 Comments


I could easily get why people five this. Whereas on the other hand I would have a hard time understanding how people can five Jimmy Eat Wold


lmao



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy