The Pop Group
Citizen Zombie


4.0
excellent

Review

by bladee runner 20xx USER (5 Reviews)
February 26th, 2015 | 43 replies


Release Date: 2015 | Tracklist

Review Summary: The rebellious teenagers have grown into rebellious adults who still know how to make wonderfully bizarre music.

The Pop Group is a post-punk group that was formed in the late 70s in Bristol, England. Seen as one of the major players in the post-punk era, they released two albums before disbanding in 1981. Citizen Zombie is their comeback album after a 35 year dead period. The art of the comeback album is a difficult one. We've seen a great deal of this over the years, and for many of them, we simply wish the artist had stayed in retirement. However, in The Pop Group's case, they have stormed back on the scene with a strangely satisfying take on the style they once helped pioneer.

While this may sound cliché, it is certainly true; this album, this group, and this whole genre even, is not for everyone. Post-punk is incredibly experimental, utilizing bits and pieces of many genres such as krautrock, dub, disco, and glam rock and then fusing it with the edgy and angry punk sound. The Pop Group has taken many such elements together to create this Frankenstein monster of an album that is altogether rather weird, but also euphoric and rapturous.

The disjointed, dissonant instrumentation is supported by the eerie vocal effort of Mark Stewart. His voice is somewhat jarring, alarming even for people who may not be used to their music, but at the same time I find it to be oddly blissful. Stewart sounds similar to what he did back in their early days, but here he sounds less angry and more dismayed. At the same time he uses the atmosphere around him to shroud himself within a façade of joy. What I mean by this is that many songs are seemingly uplifting with their use of bizarre upbeat dance grooves and pop influence, but are actually quite the opposite due to the subject matter and Stewart's unnerving voice.

The aforementioned dance grooves come into play on songs such as "s.o.p.h.i.a." and "Mad Truth", and while they feel different than a typical Pop Group track, they ended up being among my favorites on the album. Throughout the record are consistent drum lines mixed in with keyboard, guitar, and even piano. The closing track, "Echelon", is a full on piano ballad that is dreamy and pleasant, but also quite dreary due to Stewart's vocals. Many of the songs could be mistaken for indie pop/rock, but as soon as Stewart appears it takes an entirely different form, turning into the freakish sound that The Pop Group is known for.

The concern with many comeback albums is whether or not a band has exhausted their sound, or overstayed their welcome so to speak. With Citizen Zombie, The Pop Group have instead refined their sound into a more mature version of their early work. The production is cleaner and the music in general is not as rough around the edges. I find that it is a much more accessible album than Y, but better than? Probably not. Regardless, I feel that Citizen Zombie is a fantastic album and a tremendous comeback effort.

Favorite track - s.o.p.h.i.a.
Least favorite track - The Immaculate Deception


user ratings (73)
3.3
great


Comments:Add a Comment 
FLCL
February 26th 2015


85 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

First review, let me know if I did an adequate job. Any kind of criticism helps

Relinquished
February 26th 2015


48726 Comments


give me your account

PunkMoon
February 26th 2015


228 Comments


Aww man I was gonna review this.

You sound a little stilted, but that's understandable for a first attempt. I'm not an accomplished reviewer by any stretch of the imagination, but I think most of the best reviews on this site establish the review's theme early and stress or develop it accordingly. It seems like your theme is "this is an exceptional comeback record", but it doesn't seem pervasive enough to be especially compelling, if that makes any sense.

Anyway, pos. Hope to read more from you!

Jots
Emeritus
February 26th 2015


7562 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

wasn't super stoked on this. was considering reviewing but idk, found it underwhelming. wasn't expecting Y 2.0 ofc

"The Pop Group has instead refined their sound"

should change "has" to "have", given we've established The Pop Group as being plural (multiple members)





Sebinator
February 26th 2015


69 Comments


I'm really feeling this one, hopefully Gang of Four deliver something similar.

Voivod
Staff Reviewer
February 26th 2015


10711 Comments


Good review, pos.

StrangerofSorts
Emeritus
February 26th 2015


2904 Comments


should change "has" to "have", given we've established The Pop Group as being plural (multiple members)


Actually, singular is fine (and technically correct, or so I'm told, for a band) but because it does sound a bit weird, both are fine imo.

Met these guys when they were touring - talking about politics with them was pretty daunting. They know their shit.

InfamousGrouse
February 26th 2015


4378 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

seems I need this.

InfamousGrouse
February 26th 2015


4378 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

although I've just noticed Pitchfork slaughtered this, blimey

StallionMang
February 26th 2015


9003 Comments


On the other hand this has the official Fantano seal of approval so
Goddamn these differing opinions

FLCL
February 26th 2015


85 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I've never been a huge fan of pitchfork and I tend to ignore their reviews. I really like fantano though

Jots
Emeritus
February 26th 2015


7562 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Actually, singular is fine (and technically correct, or so I'm told, for a band) but because it does sound a bit weird, both are fine imo.




right, but he said "their", so should he keep his terms consistent? (another option might be changing 'their' to 'its') For example, I wouldn't say "The Beatles has released their new album"



FLCL
February 26th 2015


85 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Can I edit after a review is posted?

StrangerofSorts
Emeritus
February 26th 2015


2904 Comments


You're right, I didn't see that, sorry. Tbh I go for plurals every time - I'm just a bit traumatised after an argument with an editor about this where I got schooled. Now I just echo the party line.

Jots
Emeritus
February 26th 2015


7562 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

@FLCL - yup, go to "my profile" in the top left, and an option to edit your reviews should be there

YetAnotherBrick
February 26th 2015


6693 Comments


Great review, and i gotta hear this. so cool that a band releases an album after this long and it actually doesn't suck

YetAnotherBrick
February 26th 2015


6693 Comments


but i would say, at least on Y anyway, this band kinda went past 'post-punk' and landed in the completely 'experimental' realm

FLCL
February 26th 2015


85 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

If you felt that way for Y then you'll probably experience the same feeling on this one

YetAnotherBrick
February 26th 2015


6693 Comments


sweet. i think i might get me a physical copy

FLCL
February 26th 2015


85 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I hope you enjoy it. I sure did, but the public opinion is really polarized. Some hate it some love it



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy