Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Yeah, there was bound to be one for this album sooner or later.

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

ya the avg for this is ridonk

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

It's going to go down, it has to at least. Even I'll admit it's overblown.

is this any good?

Album Rating: 2.0

I guess it depends on how you feel about their other work

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Yeah it depends on whether or not you're a fan of the first two albums. If so, then yeah you're

probably going to enjoy this quite a bit.

god curse. i CANNOT take you seriously

because i keep laughing at your icon

Album Rating: 2.0

It is the greatest thing I've ever contributed to Sputnik

Album Rating: 4.0

and thus Curse was deemed a contributor

So is this "try-to-be-generic-radio-rock-cuz-nu-metal-sucks" bad or "we're-making-nu-metal-again-and-we're-having-a-midlife-crisis" bad?

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Well I wouldn't say it exactly fits under either of those

Album Rating: 2.0

it is sometimes one, sometimes the other, and weirdly enough sometimes both? Mostly the second one though

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

it's more like a "sorry-for-making-shitty-albums-for-you-hope-this-helps" kind of album. Though whether or not it's bad is up to you to decide.

Album Rating: 3.5

Love the punk edge and advanced songwriting.

Album Rating: 4.0

A Line In the Sand may be their best song ever.

BOLD STATEMENT.

Reanimation > hybrid party

Album Rating: 3.5

Does this 2.0 stands there until the end because it's the first Contributor review? Or how does it work here on Sputnik?

Album Rating: 4.0

I think a staff or emeritus review would be featured over it? idk

Album Rating: 3.5

Ah, of course...

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

The hierarchy goes like this Staff/Emeritus>Contributor>User



Sometimes the way reviews are flagged is weird. Sometimes user reviews become the default review even when there's a staff review for it. In that case you can report it to the mods and they'll fix it.