It's as if Deafheaven's former touring guitarist woke up one day and thought to himself, "I wonder what it'd sound like if those guys played punk?"
Except this is SO MUCH BETTER than Deafheaven.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
One of the main reasons I wrote this was to try to give the non-Sunbather fanatics a decent alternative, so yah :3
|
| |
Definitely better than Deafheaven by a mile.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
well fuck, i gave it a chance but i cant get into it. its just not very cohesive.
|
| |
Not a bad first review. The album title is actually Passenger, though. Also, the preposition rule is archaic and obsolete.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
You're archaic and obsolete!
Edited the review to reflect the actual title of the record. Thanks! I don't know how I messed that up.
|
| |
Overrated
|
| |
Still great though
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
aoty so far
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
1. Swans
2. The Great Old Ones
3. this album
|
| |
This sounds really great from what i've heard so far.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
yea this is awesome
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
digging this thus far. nice review zar.
|
| |
very, very good album. great diversity (especially the inclusion of those more punky tracks), mood changes (that final song), sweet solos, etc...
Really liking, this. Best songs are the opener and closer.
Also, the album art is fabulous!
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
I thought the penultimate tune was pretty ballin as well. will defo give this another go.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
well-done d-beats can make black metal just so fun to listen to.
|
| |
"it was a fun, albeit short, appetizer of what the band was capable"
That doesn't really make sense though dude, sorry! you haven;t reversed the structure in the way you think you have... it says, it is an appetiser consisting of what the band are capable... (??)
Capable is an adjective, it needs to describe something.
I'd add "of doing", at the end. No preposition. The thing is the "of" in that sentence makes what follows a descriptor of "appetiser"... you need to work the phrase so it doesn't end ON the proposition, not just cut the whole object of description out - you're just left with an incomplete sentence fragment then!
Think about what you mean.
Is it an appetiser made/consisting OF what they are capable of doing/producing/creating?
an appetiser that shows what they are capable of doing?
an appetiser, which shows what they are capable of doing?
(two separate but linked points; i.e., the appetiser shows what they are doing but that is not its sole "function")
IF you DO want to "reverse" the sentence structure to look smart, you could go with: "appetiser showing that of which the band are capable", or "appetiser hinting at doings of which the band are capable", or something equally pretentious. That just makes it read awkwardly though, and doesn't really fit with the flow/style of the rest of the review.
|
| |
Just trying to help/clear things up, I didn't mean to be a dick (sorry)! We all want to be better
writers, right? and we all do silly things sometimes, like starting sentences with conjunctions.
Edit: and double posting, smooth.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
You know what? Forget prepositions. I nuked that sentence outside orbit and then rebuilt it in front of the ground inside. Glad I finally got that cleared beneath.
|
| |
Sooooooo, I have been jamming this nearly non stop for the past few days, amazing fins Zaruyache!
|
| |
|
|
