Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
Yes.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Great review as always man!
But yes shorten you sentences just a bit and the (well get to those later) part is not necessary haha
|
| |
OOOOOO
A Rowan review.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
sweet rev rowrow easy pos
|
| |
awful album good rev pos m/ etc
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
That goddamn neg man
|
| |
NEGMAN
UUAUUHHH
FIGHTER OF THE POSMAN
UUAUUHHH
CHAMPION OF THE SPUT
UUAUUHHH
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off
Seconding whomever said that the review seems to cut off abruptly. It was a good read, but it seemed to demand an extra paragraph dedicated to a conclusion. Again though, enjoyable read, and it's nice to finally have a positive perspective on the album.
|
| |
god this sucks
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Thanks for the pos's guys sorry about the abrupt ending
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
aweosme a review from Rowan AND a 4 for this album, I'm too busy to read this but I definitely will be back later
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I'm challenging the boundaries that's fer sure
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
read and pos'd, good review man. sounds like you dont much appreciate the older albums which is heresy but hey you argued your points well
|
| |
"He succeeds with flying colours"
... Come on bro, he writes cool vocal melodies that's for sure, but Paul can't sing for shit. He just can't, it's not up for debate, not a good singer.
|
| |
Cool review tho btw, pos'd
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
You are using " in fact " too many times otherwise review is fine.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Damn so many people disagreeing with me in this thread and I never even saw
Thanks for the bump Jac
@SpaceMan I do love the older albums just not as much as some
@Conesmoke What if I want to put it up for debate?
@Jac you suck
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Maybe this time it was one too many
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
*swoon*
I think my water just broke
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Surprise I was just testing to see what you'd do if my water did break
Now I know that you'd leave me
:-(
|
| |
|
|
