For Today Prevailer
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Curse.
April 5th 2013


8079 Comments


This review was subjective


Goddammit when people say this shit it pisses me off so much quit being stupid

bakkermaarten007
April 5th 2013


5285 Comments


"Goddammit when people say this shit it pisses me off so much quit being stupid"

Quit pulling lines out of context.

"This review was subjective..............................................................................
for all the wrong reasons."

Curse.
April 5th 2013


8079 Comments


ALL reviews are subjective, regardless of the "right or wrong reasons." It is a fucking stupid thing to say and when people do so I immediately believe that they have double digit IQs. So congrats, moron.

nononsense
April 5th 2013


3536 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Easy Bakker, he'll go Morgan Freeman Gandalf on your ass.

Curse.
April 5th 2013


8079 Comments


I would suggest you just fly, you fool

ITsHxCTOASTER
April 5th 2013


2520 Comments


"you can not suck at making music if you try hard enough"

I have to admit I laughed at this for some reason

bakkermaarten007
April 5th 2013


5285 Comments


Sorry curseworship, but after explaining you still don't understand the nuance...
And I'm sorry you felt the need to throw an insult at me.

Curse.
April 5th 2013


8079 Comments


There is no right or wrong reason to like or dislike an album. If he doesn't like it because he is atheist and he finds the subject matter stupid that is no less right a reason than rating something a five because it hit you just right after a break-up or whatever. There is no nuance, you are just trying to judge what is a right or wrong reason to hate something, which you have no right to.

bakkermaarten007
April 5th 2013


5285 Comments


Sure there is. But oh well

Trebor.
Emeritus
April 5th 2013


59857 Comments


he doesn't like the album cuz it's shite

taxidermist
April 5th 2013


7265 Comments


Sure there is. But oh well

Please explain.

bakkermaarten007
April 5th 2013


5285 Comments


no. =)

taxidermist
April 5th 2013


7265 Comments


I respect your decision to not go into it further, however it leads me to believe that you don't have much to say on the matter.

bakkermaarten007
April 5th 2013


5285 Comments


Lol, ok =)

bakkermaarten007
April 5th 2013


5285 Comments


ok =)

taxidermist
April 5th 2013


7265 Comments


Do you like the album, bakker?

bakkermaarten007
April 5th 2013


5285 Comments


I don't know.

Wolfhorde
April 5th 2013


15387 Comments


Because sharing this knowledge with us lesser plebs would just be a waste of time, right? [/irony and stuff]

"Sure there is. But oh well"
No. You either like an album based on whatever criteria you have for liking something or you don't like something based on whatever criteria you have for disliking something. If you're seriously leading with the notion of universally objective criteria (as a given state, not something to strive for which would still be a decision and not an obligation) then not being able to elaborate upon that only reinforces the notion that you don't have any point besides your own bias.

bakkermaarten007
April 5th 2013


5285 Comments


Wolfhorde notices me again. I'm afraid of people who love me =/

Wolfhorde
April 5th 2013


15387 Comments


I don't have a problem with you, just with some of the things you say. And yes, there's quite a difference. (and even IF the former were the case, automatically discrediting anything people say just because they don't like you is equally as illogical and inconstructive as taking everything people say to heart)



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy