Why not just listen to the studio version then?

Album Rating: 4.5

Of course, live is always more energetic, and musicians always add some arrangements where it needs it, to respect the live vibes and to punch hard and enhance it all. Overall, I almost prefer my Genesis live. They are so good at it.

And your rating once again looks ridiculous.

2.0 = poor, hard to recommend it even to fans. Live albums that are identical to studio versions are an utter waste of time and disc space.

I'd say your rating is ridiculous, if this gets 4.5 then what do you give to Great Deceiver or Vital? Albums that are actually of interest to someone whom you can't sell the same thing twice?

Album Rating: 4.5

Sorry, I don't clearly understand your last sentence. English is not my mother tongue. Anyway I gave to Great Deceiver a 4.5, and Vital don't ring a bell to me (Vitalogy?). It doesn't matter anyway; I will never agree with your rating system. As for Genesis Live, I had it at a 4 lately because of the poor setlist (in terms of quantity), but I thought it deserved a 4.5 for the performance. It's that great to me. Period.