Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off
ded mow 5
|
| |
good job will lullzzl m/
|
| |
But honestly, it really feels like your reviewing is slipping along the faults. You used to be pretty
good, but now it's kind of fading.
Just revise your work when you're finished with the review then submit it. And make sure you know what
you're talking about. On this review you criticize a little more than you praise it as being a 4.5.
Btw Will i'm trying to HELP you, not BASH you and your reviewing.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Like people above me are saying: revise, yada yada...
Album itself was a dissapointment : (
|
| |
It was pretty good. I just wish he was a bit more creative with the tracks.
|
| |
ryan, i am in no way taking your advice as BASHING, but you're right, my reviewing is slipping. i need to get back on track, start reviewing during the day instead of 1:00 A.M. like i have been for like 2 weeks now
|
| |
Haven't listened to the album, nor do I plan to. I just wanted to say the title is a rip off of a Radiohead song.
|
| |
Actually the title was an idea that came from some of his fans that were almost as dumb as you are
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
whoo
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
"It was pretty good. I just wish he was a bit more creative with the tracks."
Um, this whole album is unlike anything he has produced before this and it is only an 11 track album. I do not understand how you say it is not "creative" with some tracks.
|
| |
BEST TECH-NO REV I EVER DID AHAHAHA NOSTALGIA HOUR
|
| |
Um, this whole album is unlike anything he has produced before this and it is only an 11 track album. I do not understand how you say it is not "creative" with some tracks.
Just because the tracks might be different from the material he had already put out (and no, they're not really at all, except that they are now slightly more accessible), that doesn't mean that they're wholly creative in any way. Your first point literally has nothing to do with your second
|
| |
|
|
