Album Rating: 3.0

"bulkier paragraphs can lead to more solid arguements without the need for skipping forward if a point has yet to be backed up enough" Yeah, I think this will always be the case with people who actually read reviews. Those who skim over reviews are a totally different case.



I was wondering when you would give us your opinion great Sputnik Irishman. I actually did try & stay away from the Ash comparison for the most part (hence why they are not #1 on the Reco by reviewer section).



As for you're comparison with Fightstar, it sort of makes me shake my head. Sorry Dave, but if Fightstar are pop-punk - let alone sanitized pop-punk - then I'm African. General Fiasco are Indie-Rock with glimpses of Alt-Rock, albeit very accessible versions of both. Fightstar are post-hardcore with grungy overtones. Nothing alike.



And yeah, good luck to these guys, but as I say in the review, they've got their foot in the door now... They need to improve & develop their own sound next time around.

Album is really bad.

Yeah, I think this will always be the case with people who actually read reviews. Those who skim over reviews are a totally different case.

Album Rating: 3.0

Nah. At worst, it's average & unoriginal. It's not bad.

Album Rating: 3.0

I just noticed the album cover. I don't get it. Album was released around Easter I guess.

"they're more like the Irish version of Busted or Fighstar, e.g. sanitised pop-punk with an accent."

Someone has obviously never listened to fightstar.

Album Rating: 3.0

Yeah, I'm still not certain why Dave said that. My guess is that he meant Busted... And even then, the comparison is a little strange.

Busted or Busted? Pretty sure he meant Fightstar.

Not that I know whether it is a good comparison or not...

Album Rating: 3.0

Now I'm confused. Either way, it's a bad comparison imo.