Foxy Shazam
Foxy Shazam


4.0
excellent

Review

by ironbuddahfly USER (4 Reviews)
April 15th, 2010 | 16 replies


Release Date: 2010 | Tracklist

Review Summary: An addendum about volume.

This is less a review, but more something necessary that needs to be said about this album.
The most important issue that needs to be addressed about Foxy Shazam's self-titled album is volume.
The simplicity and accessibility of their third LP can be reduced to decibel level. This main and most essential fact you need to know about this album: How loud you should play it.

Everything else is trifles and semantics: arguments against the album re: selling out, pedestrian lyrics, canned for the masses, no. No no.

Not every album should be played this loud. In fact, many albums should never be played loud. I submit that Van Morrison's Astral Weeks, Sigur Ros's (), Nick Drake's Pink Moon are just a few examples of albums that should be whispered through speakers, and the success of those albums rests greatly on the amplitude with which they are played.

Now we can all think of albums that should be played loud, and there are far too many to list, but Foxy Shazam's album is required to be played loud. Like, "our amps go up to eleven" loud, like Live At Leeds loud, like windows down, amp cranked, boil your blood and and break your ribs loud. I cannot stress how important this is to enjoy this album.

I believe the other reviewer captured the essence of the ins and outs of the album very well, so this is just an addendum.


user ratings (348)
3.9
excellent
other reviews of this album
Spec (4.5)
Songs filled with such intense emotion, the album is likely to ignite a feeling of euphoria in anyon...

bbdmittenz (4)
Foxy Shazam takes a huge leap in their career with this differently focused, but still completely en...

ShaunSintic (4)
Undeniably talented, but undeniably indefinable. Foxy Shazam knocks it out of the park again on thi...

DwyerOnTheDrums (4)
Foxy Shazam creates a sound that is relatable and familiar, while remaining unique and original. I...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Piglet
April 15th 2010


8476 Comments


I understand that this is deliberately 'less of a review' but it would be helpful if you still went more in-depth.

Comatorium.
April 15th 2010


5043 Comments


This wil be deleted.

ironbuddahfly
April 15th 2010


8 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

i know, yeah, but there's been a lot of "why the same review?" around here... so... i just wanted to do this instead.

Comatorium.
April 15th 2010


5043 Comments


Well... its not a review.

ironbuddahfly
April 15th 2010


8 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

you guys can delete it if you want, or i'll put it in the shoutbox?

Comatorium.
April 15th 2010


5043 Comments


But the album is amazing, so... idk.

ironbuddahfly
April 15th 2010


8 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

i think it's rather harmless, myself.

IdiotTech
April 15th 2010


50 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

hey whoah, ( ) rules on loud volumes. especially the end of untitled 8. i could imagine this album wanting to be loud, though, it sounds like arena rock that drank too many energy drinks.

ironbuddahfly
April 15th 2010


8 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

i'm usually asleep by 8.

WeepingBanana
April 15th 2010


11387 Comments


thank you sir for the addendum. i agree though i couldn't really find anywhere to fit this issue in my review and i didn't think it was important enough to mention. but thank you anyways

EDIT: also, i really don't understand how anyone could give this a 1 or a 1.5. it just doesn't make sense to me

PirateSquid
April 15th 2010


1881 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Because people are penisheads

DoubtGin
April 15th 2010


6879 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

cuz is apparently not as "cool" as their old stuff... meh.. this is awesome

PirateSquid
April 15th 2010


1881 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

I like my explanation more

Jips
April 15th 2010


1147 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

make this a sound off...

TheWayfarerElectric
April 16th 2010


154 Comments


If I thought that their last two works were annoying as fuck (potential is there, but rarely is it made use of), will I like this?

Jips
April 16th 2010


1147 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

i dono its possible... there is still a lot here that could annoy you... but a lot to like as well... in a different way than the other albums...



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy