awesome review. I Questioned why this got deleted with MX but this of coarse isn't my review so i didn't argue or anything. Glad this got resubmitted i like it

thanks

Millionaires > Radiohead

i agree classic album

Neg'd

thanks. i was wondering if it was Brigitte, i just wasn't sure though.

I don't buy it. Lots of things that are subjective can be valued objectively, like the integrity, originality etc. Millionaires is garbage and shouldn't be compared to the likes of great works of art like a Classic album is.

wow very deep you impress me so much with your big words and disgusting overanalyzation metacriticism of music gj

just kidding but this is dumb 'cleverness' seriously.

This is a horrible way to review music, and reading this review reminded me of a conversation I had with a friend of mine when we went to a modern art museum a couple of weeks ago. I feel that by its very (subjective) nature, this is not the way to review music, and by your measure a number score doesn't really mean anything for, uh, anything. Although I get what you're trying to do, you come off as someone trying to sound a whole lot smarter than they are. I like trashy music, I get pop - but I get it in tangible, manifest ways that I can describe and relate to someone else in my attempt to convince them, not via some metaphysical, abstract image of "art" and music as a whole. And fuck, I hope the end of history involves some sort of zombie apocalypse rather than a giant asteroid.

but uh yeah what he said this is kinda a pretentious and bad way to review stuff oops

no u

no u

now we come to the same level of understanding

Album Rating: 3.0

I'll probaly love this. I'm still over enthusiastic about scene girls.

make no mistake balls, its absolutely terrible

but its cosmic, man

This "system" belongs to the same logic everything else in the Universe does, evolution and expansion. You say all art is crap, but your generalization assumes that the system isn't working correctly because nature produces nothing but mistakes.

In reality nature makes mistakes so she can learn to do it better, just like any other intelligent being in her Universe would do. In art, Millionaires represent the mistake - just as important a part of the system as the success, but definitely not as introspective, witty and beautiful. They are important in our learning cycle but once the success succeeds they are no longer relevant and another mistake will be made.

I'm sorry but that seems to make a lot of fundamental assumptions about logic and nature I am either undecided about or completely disagree with.

To me, there is no system. There is no spoon, and no bowl to eat out of either.

Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.

Reality is perception. An illusion does not maintain a steady atmosphere, whereas reality does. How do we know that reality is real? Sometimes, its really, really fucking boring.

No.

You'll need to explain why there is no reality.