Intronaut Prehistoricisms
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
SnackaryBinx
October 12th 2008


2309 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

to be honest, why is this under metalcore? I really think this should be under metal with bands like Isis and Neurosis etc.

NortherlyNanook
October 12th 2008


1285 Comments


It's all because of Mappy's argument with Burt in the Void. (Probably not, but it's fun to blame it on that)

72haha72
October 13th 2008


439 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

This album is one of my favorites of 2008 without a single doubt. Since the first time I heard their previous album "Void" I knew I loved Intronaut, I would also recommend it to anyone who liked this album.



Kick ass review, I loved the way you described their soundThis Message Edited On 10.13.08

pixiesfanyo
October 13th 2008


1223 Comments


i like this a lot more than void.

72haha72
October 13th 2008


439 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Yes, this is a lot better than Void, they definitely took a great step forward in songwriting and made this a more intense experience. But Void is really good in my opinion, the problem with it is that it is a bit repetitive

Bleak123
October 14th 2008


1902 Comments


This actually surprised me with just how good it is. Although not as good as 'Colors' by BtBaM this is still an absolutely phenomenal album from a relatively young band.

mynameischan
Staff Reviewer
October 14th 2008


17958 Comments


what does colors have to do with this

Bleak123
October 14th 2008


1902 Comments


It actually has no relevance at all. I've been listening to 'Colors' and this a lot recently and keep seeming to associate them together despite the relatively huge difference in sound. meh, idk.

taylormemer
October 14th 2008


4957 Comments


People often bring up Colors just because they can.

Bleak123
October 14th 2008


1902 Comments


haha it's just a stupid link i have between that and this in my head

taylormemer
October 14th 2008


4957 Comments


You aren't the first I believe.

yas666eer
October 14th 2008


274 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

i found most parts of it alright, but occasionally it got really good. have to give it a couple of more spins

Jetty89
October 17th 2008


22 Comments


I bought this because of all the praise it got here. And so far i am very far from impressed, five minutes of straight bongos isnt very exciting for a 16 minute song. I will listen to it in hopes that it will eventually grab me...but im doubting it.

AngelPhoenix
October 17th 2008


2764 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Yeah, I'm really not sure what people are raving about. It's solid all around but it's also pretty boring all around. None of the instrumentation or song structuring seems particularly adept to me. Maybe there's something about the "post-metal"ness of it that I don't get. Hell, besides ambiances and such, I don't really know what's involved in post-metal. Though I doubt if I did that it would much change how I feel about this.

/rant.

mynameischan
Staff Reviewer
October 17th 2008


17958 Comments


that's what you call a rant?

AngelPhoenix
October 17th 2008


2764 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

lol well it's more than I usually say now. My days of 100 post noob-blocks of biased nonsense are over.

SnackaryBinx
October 17th 2008


2309 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

he rated it a 3.5, he probably still enjoyed it.

Yazz_Flute
October 17th 2008


18929 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

yeah I probably wont check this out, I couldn't get into Isis and I'm assuming these guys are kinda similar.

Bleak123
October 17th 2008


1902 Comments


they're not as similar as you might think. personally, i reckon you'd like this band.

Kage
October 17th 2008


1172 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

this isn't really similar to Isis much at all.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy