The review did a bad job of shedding light on that.This Message Edited On 11.04.07
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I dont see anything wrong with the review.
|
| |
Instead of using the sound production as both a pro and a con in two paragraphs why don't you just say that it's controversial in the beginning. As it stands your arguments make no sense. Also, how does the fact that the band recorded this like they did back in 84' mean the album is going to be both bad and good.
AND, this review doesn't read like a 3. More like a 4.
|
| |
Excellent review Deth, got my vote
ps: english is obviously our second language ;)
From what i read in your review, i will not get this , thanks
|
| |
ZOMG ENGLISH IS YOUR 2ND LANGUAGE? You absolutely have to be condoned for being bad writers
..
|
| |
"So what"
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
:lol: @ Kal
|
| |
"So what"
you're rubber and i'm glue amirite?
|
| |
of course
|
| |
I haven't heard the original yet so i couldnt really compare them, but this is pretty damn good. Witching Metal is awesome.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
From what i read in your review, i will not get this , thanks No, get this album. Trust me, it sounds as evil as "In The Sign Of Evil".
|
| |
rules
|
| |
hard
|
| |
WITCHING METAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIIIIUUUUUUUUUUUUGH
|
| |
WITCHING METAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIIIIUUUUUUUUUUUUGH [2]
|
| |
outbreak of eeeeVVAIIAAILAEEEH
|
| |
WITCHING METAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIIIIUUUUUUUUUUUUGH [3]
|
| |
best album of 2000s prob
|
| |
easily
|
| |
hail the necros rising
|
| |
|
|
