Van Halen
Van Halen


1.0
awful

Review

by hyperboleking USER (5 Reviews)
July 24th, 2007 | 150 replies


Release Date: 1978 | Tracklist

Review Summary: My first TBT, this is the second most overrated album ever.

In the late 70’s, a musical phenomenon called punk swept up the American and British youth culture, suddenly causing them to turn on bands they had been extremely loyal to just a few years before, such as Led Zeppelin, The Who, and The Rolling Stones. Out of nowhere, Zeppelin was “dinosaur rock” and fast, aggressive punk bands such as The Ramones and The Clash became the forefront of rock.

This proved to be a short-lived fad, however, a fact often attributed to Van Halen’s debut album, released in 1978, which caused a resurgence in popularity for hard rock music. Van Halen took the hard rock format and sped it up and added whimsicality factor, which proved to be wildly popular with Americans. Surprisingly, Van Halen’s striking good looks and party-hard attitude caused them to successfully introduce the hard rock genre to a significant female audience.

Pity the music is trash.

Below is a track by track review of this unfortunate classic, directly responsible for legions of faceless hair metal bands in the 80’s. Please don’t give me any stupid comments now about how I don’t give enough detail and the like, because clearly, I did on this one.

1. Running with the Devil

This track opens up with an odd sound effect, which slowly fades in before you are blasted with a short bassline and then a pounding riff. Unfortunately, the riff is about as dumb as the riff from “Black Sabbath.” It is annoying and extremely loud, for seemingly no reason other than the purpose of being loud. We then get treated to some of front-loser David Lee Roth’s infamously terrible lyrics. “I live my life like there's no tomorrow, and all I've got I had to steal.” Okay. You’re cool then, Dave. You’re runnin’ with the devil. Yeehaw. This features on of Eddie’s worst solos, even by his standards. The rhythm is also predictably terrible; Van Halen is famous for their awful drummer and bassist, who sound like they belong in an R&B band. Overall, one of the worst tracks in the entire history of the world. 0/5

2. Eruption

Ooooo, ahhhhh. How impressive, indeed! Two handed tapping—how difficult! And what an original idea—not like Jimmy Page had already done this in the solo in “Heartbreaker.” And even if he did, he didn’t have a ton of effects pedals to make it sound faster and more technical than it really was like this god did! All hail Eddie! This is an entirely instrumental track which consists of Eddie making some extremely irritating and unmelodic noises with his guitar. It brings to mind the first time you got an electric guitar, and you didn’t know how to play, so you messed around with it and made some crappy sounds and said “Screw learning—I’ll just make this my trademark style!” It also represents the point in which a large part of heavy metal became trying to craft as outrageously annoying a guitar solo as humanly possible, regardless of if the solo even makes sense musically or fits the song. 0/5

3. You Really Got Me

Overall, the best song on the album. Of course, it was written by the Kinks. The riff is incredibly catchy. Again, it was written by the Kinks, not these buffoons. David Lee Roth’s voice is a poor substitution, indeed, and the solo is unsurprisingly, crap, as it doesn’t fit the song one bit. 1/5

4. Ain’t Talkin’ ‘Bout Love

This song contains a terribly cheesy riff that could easily be found in a Kiss record. The lyrics are incredibly sexist (“You know, you’re semi-good lookin’”). I also found the “Hey! Hey! Hey!”’s nothing but annoying. The solo is extremely bad as well. It isn’t even fast, which I guess is one thing you have to hand to Eddie: he can hit a bunch of random notes fast. Here he does it slow for no reason. Drumming sucks, bass sucks. 0/5

5. I’m The One

What is this song about again? I have no idea. All I know is that the riff is repetitive and there are three (!) piss-poor solos in this crapfest. Dave sounds particularly self-important in this idiotic song; I can’t quite explain it but his tone when he sings “Show your love, babe” he sounds like he thinks he’s Frank Sinatra or something. He’s actually a terrible excuse for a terrible singer, mostly because he isn’t even a singer, he just shouts.0/5

6. Jamie’s Crying

These lyrics would actually seem to be against sexism if not for the sarcastic tone they’re sung in. So I think this is actually another sexist song. It’s extremely poppish, and that annoying tribal drum beat has been endlessly sampled in rap music. I still hate it just as much today as I did then. The solo sucks. Michael Anthony’s harmonies aren’t too terrible in this song, though. So a .2. .2/0

7. Atomic Punk

This is probably getting repetitive, but people want details on here. Contains a futuristic rock riff with some cool effects. Of course the lyrics absolutely suck (“Nobody rules these streets at night but me, the atomic punk!”), the solo does not fit the song, and David Lee Roth annoys me when he says “Puunnnnkkkkkk!” But that riff doesn’t meet the standard of awfulness set by most of the album. .1/5

8. Feel Your Love Tonight

A lot like “Jamie’s Crying.” Even Michael Anthony’s harmonizing is irritating on this one. 0/5

9. Little Dreamer

A ballad that sucks. The lyrics don’t make any sense, and the whole song is the same three second riff. The solo really disconnected here. Overall, it is Van Halen attempting to be serious. And when not hiding behind the “We’re a big party band! Woo hoo!” shtick, it’s even easier to see that this band had not an ounce of talent and ruined the 80’s rock scene and indeed metal forever.

10. Ice Cream Man
A bluesy cover song that starts off with an acoustic. The acoustic with just David is mildly cool, sounds like something you’d hear in a bar, which works. Then Eddie’s horrific playing pops in and the song is instantly ruined. The solo sounds like defecation. 0/5

11. On Fire

Woo hoo! Scream with Dave! He’s on fire!

Actually I couldn’t’ care less about this piece of garbage, with yet another terrible riff, yet another terrible solo, and still yet Dave’s “singing.” And hey. Michael and Alex, try playing a different rhythm, just once. 0/5

Overall, this is a terrible album and Eddie is one of the most wildly uninventive guitarists in the history of overrated crap. The bassist sings better than the frontman and the drummer plays one beat, always. Don’t buy this terrible trash, ever. It is a disgrace to human kind and ruined hard rock forever, placing right behind Nirvana’s Nevermind as the second most overrated album of all time.

True, this album did destroy the atrocity of punk rock bands like Sex Pistols etc. But in its place it gave us a decade of hair metal and terrible guitar playing. I wish this album would have never been released.


user ratings (1495)
4.3
superb
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
rattlehead42147
July 24th 2007


1345 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

please stop you're practically spamming the site and pushing other good reviews off the frontpage. now you're just trying to go against the grain by reviewing these great albums.



please.

stop.

hyperboleking
July 24th 2007


407 Comments


This is my opinion on this "great" album. Many requested that I do a more detailed review and I did. they claimed they were not voting against me because i disagreed with them but because i wasnt giving enough detail. i'm hoping they were honest.

you clearly have yet to grasp that there's people who don't believe everything the musical elite believes.

Angmar
July 24th 2007


2688 Comments


Ok seriously, your name couldn't be further from the truth, all your doing it taking albums people like and trashing them, by reading your reviews i have a very hard time telling whether or not your opinions are even real, honestly.This Message Edited On 07.24.07

wow at almost 300 views.This Message Edited On 07.24.07

hyperboleking
July 24th 2007


407 Comments


ugggh... satisfy people who complain of lack of detail, then you get people who just downright don't agree with you, so your review sucks.

hyperboleking
July 24th 2007


407 Comments


i'm having a hard time even believing the 300 views. how can that happen? there aren't even that many people commenting on the site right now.

Angmar
July 24th 2007


2688 Comments


I never said your review sucks or that i disagree with you, I said, your writing seems forced, like your almost just trying to piss people off with your opinions, your review is a meh TBT.

hyperboleking
July 24th 2007


407 Comments


fair enough.

tom79
July 24th 2007


3936 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Yeah this albums not that good. I don't even remember reviewing last year though I apparently liked it then haha. Some of their songs are fun though, even if terrible lyrically and overly cheesy. What makes it fun.This Message Edited On 07.24.07

Eakflanderyof
July 24th 2007


5379 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Dude, hyperboleking, you are full of lose. This Message Edited On 07.24.07

hyperboleking
July 24th 2007


407 Comments


I find it to be absolutely unbearable and would rather kill my dog than hear anything ever again from this dreadful band.

hyperboleking
July 24th 2007


407 Comments


"Dude, hyperboleking, you are full of lose."

what does that even mean?

Eakflanderyof
July 24th 2007


5379 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I'm just joking around. It's basically the nerdy internetz way of saying that you hate stuff that I find great. I don't find Sabbath great, but I think they are good and undoubtedly important.

hyperboleking
July 24th 2007


407 Comments


I think Sabbath sucked but that is a matter of opinion. What isn't is history, and I don't think BS was important. Heavy metal would have happened just fine without them-- the template was really set by Led Zeppelin, especially since BS imitated Zeppelin so.

Skyler
July 24th 2007


1084 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

You realize what this album did for the electric guitar, right?

hyperboleking
July 24th 2007


407 Comments


Yes-- made it fashionable to be pointlessly fast, unmelodic, and to deliver barrages of notes that don't fit with the song as a solo.

i hate this album and i hate what it did to the electric guitar. it is emotionless trash.

chimera908
July 24th 2007


713 Comments


Don't feed hyperboles fire, I tried to apologize for overreacting earlier on his Nevermind review and, the egotistical maniac he is, merely insulted me back. You want him to stop polluting our site than ignore him.

The Sludge
July 24th 2007


2171 Comments


Oh my fucking God. Please, at least for the time being chill the fuck out on writing reviews, especially ones that are written just to piss people off for attention.

I will hand it to you for only being on the site for two days, creating this much controversy. But it lead me to the conclusion that you are either an alt account playing a clever joke or some attention whore.

Oh, I don't get the part about your username.This Message Edited On 07.24.07

hyperboleking
July 24th 2007


407 Comments


"Don't feed hyperboles fire, I tried to apologize for overreacting earlier on his Nevermind review and, the egotistical maniac he is, merely insulted me back. You want him to stop polluting our site than ignore him."

If you want, go back and read how it all started. HE started with the attacks on ME, because he disagreed with me. And I didn't really insult him. i just said i wasn't sorry and i (mistakenly) thought he had posted a negative review just to try and copy what he saw as my formula, he corrected that and i apologized. go read it for yourself.

"Oh my ****ing God. Please, at least for the time being chill the **** out on writing reviews, especially ones that are written just to piss people off for attention."

They aren't made just for attention. They are bringing out the truth and a perspective you've probably never heard before. Sort of like the first day I went to college and a professor presented me with some of the most absurd theories I had ever heard about science, only to get everyone talking and thinking.

"I will hand it to you for only being on the site for two days, creating this much controversy. But it lead me to the conclusion that you are either an alt account playing a clever joke or some attention whore."

I'm neither of those. I am a truth-telling, anti-musical elitist. it is also a hoax that all my reviews are negative, see my hendrix review.

hyperboleking
July 24th 2007


407 Comments


you all know i am right about this. do you really love the album that started hair metal?This Message Edited On 07.24.07

Meatplow
July 24th 2007


5523 Comments


Give up if your gonna keep churning out reviews like this, seriously.

This review is a subjective load of crap, with points of interest few and far between. I thought you would of learnt some kind of lesson with the comments you got on your Black Sabbath review. Seriously you have potential but you seemed stunted by some idea juvenile trash talking is the way to get your point across. Grow up.

To the album itself, i've enjoyed it quite a lot in the past. It's around a 4 for me, Van Halen has never been something i've connected to that much but i still seem to have listened to this many times over.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy