Album Rating: 2.5

[quote=Hysterical]I have heard a majority of the bands[/quote]



I bet you have. ;)

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

Yeah, because naming a bunch of random shitty bands you found on MySpace, listened to once and then arbitrarily named really warrant you being such a condescending douchebag.

Album Rating: 4.0

counter teared

Album Rating: 3.5

I think that may have been the most retarded, irony-laced posts in the history of Sputnik

Out of all those bands...i would accept TOTT, In mourning, The faceless, and maybe opeth. And thats me being generous. Idk about the faceless either, its a great album, but its no fun.

Album Rating: 2.5

[quote=Coke]Yeah, because naming a bunch of random shitty bands you found on MySpace, listened to once and then arbitrarily named really warrant you being such a condescending douchebag.[/quote]

That would make me a condescending douchebag, wouldn't it?



I'm glad I didn't include Fortress. Otherwise someone might have confused me with you.



And I still love you bro. Had this not been directed at me, I might have laughed my ass off.

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

I'm glad I didn't include Fortress. Otherwise someone might have confused me with you.

Seriously, that might be the most beaten-to-death comment on the site.
Even I've done it (for shame, self, for shame)This Message Edited On 12.04.08

Album Rating: 3.5

lol coke labeling someone a condescending douchebag.

Takes one to know one I suppose. This Message Edited On 12.04.08

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

lol!

Album Rating: 3.5

fuck, not-so-ninja edit.

Anyway, that's all you got for me now coke is an lol? I thought you had more self-respect than that.

Why all the hate on Coke?

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

you losers are trying to bait me into an argument, i dont see what self-respect has to do with it

Album Rating: 2.5

[quote=Coke]Whoa! No one has ever used that one before![/quote]

Whoa! No one has ever used that one before!



I'm finally arguing with Coke, this is better than I imagined. My life is complete.

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

We aren't arguing.

Album Rating: 3.5

It's just that you used to be fun to annoy

Zoo, you have 1600+ albums rated.
You have three reviews.
Let's play the math game!

Assuming most of those average at 50 minutes each, and the minimum number of listens to get a good appreciation of an album is 3 (just for example's sake, it's more), it gives us this:
3 x 50 x 1600 = 240000

Divide that by 60 and you get 4000, and divide that by 24 and you get 166 and 2/3rds days.

I'm going to go no further with this, but assuming you've listened to most of those since your join date at the beginning of last year, you'd have to have spent at least 1 out of every 3 days listening to music ALL day to truly grasp all that music.

And that's THREE listens.

Album Rating: 3.5

24 hours out of 72 really isn't that much dude. I would say I have metal playing at least 6-8 hours a day every day.



Plus, he might have know about/listened to many of those albums long before finding sputnik. This Message Edited On 12.04.08

[quote=]24 hours out of 72[/quote]
What??

Album Rating: 3.5

spent at least 1 out of every 3 days listening to music ALL day