Album Rating: 3.5

this gives me so many boners

"post in question was a valid if biased opinion, but understandable"

no, it was retarded because she's saying "I'd love to downrate this (meaning, rate intentionally lower than what she actually thinks it is, just cause she thinks that's edgy) but I'm not going to listen to it" which amounts to essentially "I won't listen to this because it looks uninteresting to me". why even bother posting?

p sure downrating meant rating it sincerely, knowing you wouldn't like it, to counter the high ratings, but not bothering to listen to it so it was legitimate because who would subject themselves to something they would clearly dislike just to do that

about the same merit of a post saying "this looks great!" tbh

"about the same merit of a post saying "this looks great!" tbh"


Except that saying "this looks great!" is actually relevant because it means you'll listen to it and post a real opinion on it instead of being a stupid cunt.

keep forgetting that a negative comment on a communally well-liked album yields the attitude that nothing but positive opinions count as valid. p sure 90% of the people posting on a lulu review don't plan on listening to that shit ever but it's cool because fuck that album right? the poster was expressing the opinion that this album doesn't garner any interest in her mind because let's be honest it's not really that interesting and that seems ok to me, are you not entertained is this not why you are here

"p sure downrating meant rating it sincerely, knowing you wouldn't like it, to counter the high ratings"

oh wow, that's probably even more retarded. either way, the moral of the story is that Baseline is a terrible user.

yeah because striving to have slightly more objective and userbase reflective ratings is retarded

clearly only those that think albums are great should rate them that'll work out

people still make post-rock?

also: I agree with people saying this band is boring because they are

not what I'm saying at all. being self-centred enough that you think it's your duty to try to lower an average on an album that you assume you'll find overrated is retarded. when I think an album's average is too high (after listening to it myself btw) I don't make it my duty to try to lower the average. that's stupid as fuck.

Spare is almost as retarded as Baseline...

if an album's got a 4.2 avg and i think it's a 2/5 i'm gonna damn sure rate that shit a 2/5 bro

"if an album's got a 4.2 avg and i think it's a 2/5 i'm gonna damn sure rate that shit a 2/5 bro"

me too? what are you getting at here? you seemed to be arguing that it would make sense to rate it a 1 to try to get the average much lower.

when did i say that, i said a sincere rating

anyone else notice that there are currently three album summaries on the front page that mention a band "realizing their potential"?

anyone else notice that there are currently three album summaries on the front page that mention a band "realizing their potential"?

Wow. You are a close minded cunt, you know that?

"I guess knowing over 100 bands from every country in the world also makes me close-minded? oh well...
poor me."

haha oh you. still yet to see a non-retarded post from you.

quick, name me your favourite 100 artists from Botswana.

still waiting for your top 100 bands from Botswana