Album Rating: 4.0

I agree.

i dont think this is THAT dissonant
you can follow the key relatively easy

nope, what i meant was; listening to it it sounds logical
unlike freejazz for example

Album Rating: 4.0

dissonant doesn't mean illogical

Album Rating: 4.0

good rating, toxman..



I guess by logical he meant orderly and somewhat structured or something.

Album Rating: 4.0

this is actually a placeholder 5 tho i'm sure i've heard parts of this



and ok but who said dissonant works can't be orderly or structured, wasn't that the point of serialism

Album Rating: 4.0

well idk. and yeah, you probably have heard parts of this before. it seems really familiar to me.

to put it simply
it might have dissonant qualities but theyre not so obvious that you notice them and get ear fatiqued

disagreed hard

Album Rating: 4.0

I found this uncompromisingly accessible.



I know this because I like it a lot.

just because it's accessible doesn't mean it's not incredibly dissonant though

true but naturally we humans are drawn to harmony rather than dissonance
harmony being therefore more accesible
but you obviously know this
just pointing it out

Album Rating: 4.0

just because it's accessible doesn't mean it's not incredibly dissonant though

i meant accessible is relation to, say, a Webern or Penderecki piece

I thought the point of being dissonant was to be inaccessible...

Part 2 is so awesome, love those first eerie minutes.
Stravinsky is the only composer that I'm really hooked on right now.

no offense

Album Rating: 4.0

this is a dumb convo where's liledman to straighten things out

Album Rating: 4.0

Album Rating: 4.0