Carnifex Slow Death
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Ebola
August 9th 2016


4522 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Actually pretty interested to jam this; never really liked these guys as much as Whitechapel, but they're clearly a step above your average chug-a-lug deathcore dreck. Really like the album cover, too.



Edit: Holy balls this thing rips

Brabiz
August 10th 2016


2201 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

Goddammit this is amazing

YuriZakhaev
August 10th 2016


1062 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Love how these guys have evolved over the past few years without going too far away from their core sound and how each album kind of picks up exactly from the last, continuing that transition. Bands like Whitechapel need to take note.

betray
August 10th 2016


9392 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

i think whitechapel is doing alright lmao

SIIMBOLIC
August 10th 2016


1713 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

nah theyve stagnated pretty hard

YuriZakhaev
August 10th 2016


1062 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

They're a brand more than a band these days tbh. I'm a big fan, but I wasn't too big on OEW and couldn't stand Mark of the Blade. Everything before is killer, imo.

dbizzles
August 10th 2016


15197 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

[2]

betray
August 10th 2016


9392 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

but saying that whitechapel needs to take notes from carnifex is a bit silly, no?

betray
August 10th 2016


9392 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

like whitechapel is clearly doing well

dbizzles
August 10th 2016


15197 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I mean, maybe they could take notes to try to stop writing music that is less and less interesting every album.

Futures
August 10th 2016


10811 Comments


rip whitechapel

Nazzadan
August 10th 2016


2372 Comments


Prob the best deathcore I've ever heard, if I could be completely honest family.

brainmelter
Contributing Reviewer
August 10th 2016


8335 Comments


whitechapel is not doing well. maybe money wise, but not on the ears

YuriZakhaev
August 10th 2016


1062 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

"but saying that whitechapel needs to take notes from carnifex is a bit silly, no?"



By going the black metal route, no, I don't want them doing that. What I meant was how they progressed from NEOC to their self-titled and then went off a completely different tangent after that. I love their self-titled, because the songwriting was more honed and tight; lyrics weren't too bad either tbh. I wish they would've stayed on that track, because they carved out a definitive sound for themselves with that record - for me, anyway.

YuriZakhaev
August 10th 2016


1062 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Past that, though, they are doing well. Saw them at Warped Tour and they put on a killer show, although they only played five songs and all of them were from the last two albums.

Ebola
August 11th 2016


4522 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I liked Mark of the Blade considerably more than OEW, but I'd still say that this is better than either of the two. Damn good stuff.

SIIMBOLIC
August 11th 2016


1713 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I reckon new era is easily whitechapels best. Dehumanisation and murder sermon are brilliant tracks

Futures
August 11th 2016


10811 Comments


this is exile or somatic or foad

iloveyouall
August 11th 2016


6312 Comments


[2]

SIIMBOLIC
August 11th 2016


1713 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Foad was a darkthrone album not Whitechapel



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy